Government supported junk social science-or sanctified snake oil
as Sarnoff terms it-exists in all policy arenas along the entire
political spectrum, as policy advocates seek to justify the
continuation of ineffective programs and to block alternative
solutions. This form of junk science is particularly dangerous and
wasteful in terms of tax dollars because professional confirmation,
media investigation and government support lend it an unwarranted
imprimatur of validity. Sarnoff argues that it confuses the public
and convinces them to support programs as ends in themselves,
rather than determining whether or not such efforts actually
achieve purported goals.
Ineffectiveness, incompetence, lack of technology, ideology
masquerading as policy, and even outright fraud serve to perpetuate
the general confusion. This situation is exacerbated by the
proliferation of media attention, much of it unmonitored for
accuracy or bias. Sanctified snake oil, Sarnoff contends, spawns
industries that drain public resources and attention from real,
serious cases and distort public perceptions of the magnitude of
the issues involved. This study sheds new light on this muddle and
offers recommendations which will make it more difficult for junk
science to represent itself as legitimate social policy.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!