In analyzing evidence indicating that K'ung-ts'ung-tzu was a
forgery, Yoav Ariel questions current views of the Confucian school
in the time between the Sage's death in the fifth century B.C. and
the emergence in the eleventh century of Neo-Confucianism. The
text, traditionally ascribed to a descendant of Confucius, K'ung Fu
(264-208 B.C.), provides a setting for a series of philosophical
debates between K'ung family members and representatives of such
non-Confucian schools as Legalism, Mohism, and the School of Names.
However, finding that this text was probably fabricated by the
controversial Confucian master, Wang Su (A.D. 195-256), Ariel
explains how it sheds light on the third-century philosophical
milieu: Confucianism then is seen to have been not only
Taoistically metaphysical, individualistic, and escapist, but also
aggressive in advocating early Confucian values.
The first part of Ariel's book deals with the general
characteristics, history, dating, authenticity, and authorship of
the text. The second part is a fully annotated and analyzed
translation of the first of the two traditional volumes that
constitute the K'ung-ts'ung-tzu.
Originally published in 1989.
The Princeton Legacy Library uses the latest print-on-demand
technology to again make available previously out-of-print books
from the distinguished backlist of Princeton University Press.
These paperback editions preserve the original texts of these
important books while presenting them in durable paperback
editions. The goal of the Princeton Legacy Library is to vastly
increase access to the rich scholarly heritage found in the
thousands of books published by Princeton University Press since
its founding in 1905.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!