|
|
Books > Religion & Spirituality > Christianity > Protestantism & Protestant Churches > Calvinist, Reformed & Presbyterian Churches
"The Crisis of Causality" deals with the reaction of the Dutch
Calvinist theologian Gisbertus Voetius (1589-1676) to the "New
Philosophy" of Rene Descartes (1596-1650). Voetius not only
criticised the Cartesian idea of a mechanical Universe; he also
foresaw that shifting conceptions of natural causality would make
it impossible for theologians to explain the relationship between
God and Creation in philosophical terms. This threatened the status
of theology as a scientific discipline. Apart from a detailed
analysis of the Scholastic and Cartesian notions of causality, the
book offers new perspectives on related subjects, such as
seventeenth-century university training and the Cartesian method of
science. It will be of great importance to any student of
seventeenth-century intellectual history, philosophy, theology and
history of science.
Faith, Reason, and Revelation in the Thought of Theodore Beza investigates the direction of religious epistemology under a chief architect of the Calvinistic tradition (1519-1605). Mallinson contends that Beza defended and consolidated his tradition by balancing the subjective and objective aspects of faith and knowledge. He makes use of newly published primary sources and long-neglected biblical annotations in order to clarify the thought of an often misunderstood individual from intellectual history.
The Oxford Handbook of Jonathan Edwards offers a state-of-the-art
summary of scholarship on Edwards by a diverse, international, and
interdisciplinary group of Edwards scholars, many of whom serve as
global leaders in the burgeoning world of research and writing on
'America's theologian'. As an early modern clerical polymath,
Edwards is of interest to historians, theologians, and literary
scholars. He is also an interlocutor for contemporary clergy and
philosophical theologians. All such readers-and many more-will find
here an authoritative overview of Edwards' life, ministry, and
writings, as well as a representative sampling of cutting-edge
scholarship on Edwards from across several disciplines. The volume
falls into four sections, which reflect the diversity of Edwards
studies today. The first section turns to the historical Edwards
and grounds him in his period and the relevant contexts that shaped
his life and work. The second section balances the historical
reconstruction of Edwards as a theological and philosophical
thinker with explorations of his usefulness for constructive
theology and the church today. In part three, the focus shifts to
the different ways and contexts in which Edwards attempted to
realize his ideas and ideals in his personal life, scholarship, and
ministry, but also to the ways in which these historical realities
stood in tension with, limited, or resisted his aspirations. The
final section looks at Edwards' widening renown and influence as
well as diverse appropriations. This Handbook serves as an
authoritative guide for readers overwhelmed by the enormity of the
multi-lingual world of Edwards studies. It will bring readers up to
speed on the most important work being done and then serve them as
a benchmark in the field of Edwards scholarship for decades to
come.
The reformation was not a western European event, but historians have neglected the study of Protestantism in central and eastern Europe. This book aims to rectify this situation. It examines one of Europe's largest Protestant communities in Hungary and Transylvania. It highlights the place of the Hungarian Reformed church in the international Calvinist world, and reveals the impact of Calvinism on Hungarian politics and society.
The Christian doctrine of God has traditionally been presented in
two parts: an account of the existence and attributes of God on the
one hand, and an account of God's triunity on the other. The
present study is an analysis of Karl Barth's doctrine of the divine
attributes (or 'perfections'), as it appears in his "Church
Dogmatics II/1". Barth's doctrine of the divine perfections has
received comparatively little attention, and what attention it has
received is typically very selective. Authors unaware of larger,
structural themes in Barth's account often misconstrue significant
details of Barth's text. Others wrongly discount the implications
of Barth's doctrine of the perfections for his theology as a whole.
The aim of this study is primarily to clarify what Barth says about
the perfections and secondarily to relate this to broader themes in
Barth's theology. "T&T Clark Studies in Systematic Theology" is
a series of monographs in the field of Christian doctrine, with a
particular focus on constructive engagement with major topics
through historical analysis or contemporary restatement.
Though known today largely for dating the creation of the world to
400BC, James Ussher (1581-1656) was an important scholar and
ecclesiastical leader in the seventeenth century. As Professor of
Theology at Trinity College Dublin, and Archbishop of Armagh from
1625, he shaped the newly protestant Church of Ireland. Tracing its
roots back to St. Patrick, he gave it a sense of Irish identity and
provided a theology which was strongly Calvinist and fiercely
anti-Catholic. In exile in England in the 1640s he advised both
king and parliament, trying to heal the ever-widening rift by
devising a compromise over church government. Forced finally to
choose sides by the outbreak of civil was in 1642, Ussher opted for
the royalists, but found it difficult to combine his loyalty to
Charles with his detestation of Catholicism.
A meticulous scholar and an extensive researcher, Ussher had a
breathtaking command of languages and disciplines--"learned to a
miracle" according to one of his friends. He worked on a series of
problems: the early history of bishops, the origins of Christianity
in Ireland and Britain, and the implications of double
predestination, making advances which were to prove of lasting
significance. Tracing the interconnections between this scholarship
and his wider ecclesiastical and political interests, Alan Ford
throws new light on the character and attitudes of a seminal figure
in the history of Irish Protestantism.
Lincolnshire, 1537. Amid England's religious turmoil,
fifteen-year-old Anne Askew is forced to take her dead sister's
place in an arranged marriage. The witty, well-educated gentleman's
daughter is determined to free herself from her abusive husband,
harsh in-laws, and the cruel strictures of her married life. But
this is the England of Henry VIII, where religion and politics are
dangerously entangled. A young woman of Anne's fierce independence,
Reformist faith, uncanny command of plainspoken scripture, and-not
least-connections to Queen Katheryn Parr's court cannot long escape
official notice, or censure. In a deft blend of history and
imagination, award-winning novelist Rilla Askew brings to life a
young woman who defied the conventions of her time, ultimately
braving torture and the fire of martyrdom for her convictions. A
rich evocation of Reformation England, from the fenlands of
Lincolnshire to the teeming religious underground of London to the
court of Henry VIII, this gripping tale of defiance is as pertinent
today as it was in the sixteenth century. While skillfully
portraying a significant historical figure-one of the first female
writers known to have composed in the English language-Prize for
the Fire renders the inner life of Anne Askew with a depth and
immediacy that transcend time.
Grace and Freedom addresses the issue of divine grace in relation
to the freedom of the will in Reformed or "Calvinist" theology in
the late sixteenth and early seventeenth century. It focuses on the
work of the English Reformed theologian William Perkins, especially
his role as an apologist of the Church of England, defending its
theology against the Roman Catholic polemic, and specifically
against the charge that Reformed theology denies human free choice.
Perkins and his Reformed contemporaries affirm that salvation
occurs by grace alone and that God is the ultimate cause of all
things, but they also insist on the freedom of the human will and
specifically the freedom of choice in a way that does not conform
to modern notions of "libertarian freedom" or "compatibilism." In
developing this position, Perkins drew on the thought of Reformers
such as Peter Martyr Vermigli and Zacharias Ursinus, on the nuanced
positions of medieval scholastics, and several contemporary Roman
Catholic representatives of the so-called "second scholasticism."
His work was a major contribution to early modern Reformed thought
both in England and on the continent. His influence in England
extended both to the Reformed heritage of the Church of England and
to English Puritanism. On the continent, his work contributed to
the main lines of Reformed orthodoxy and to the piety of the Dutch
Second Reformation.
What's wrong with Calvinism? Since the Reformation, Calvinism has
dominated much of evangelical thought. It has been so well
established that many Christians simply assume it to be the truest
expression of Christian doctrine. But Calvinism has some serious
biblical and theological weaknesses that unsettle laypeople,
pastors and scholars alike. God is sovereign. All evangelical
Christians--whether Arminians or Calvinists--have no doubt about
this fundamental truth. But how does God express his sovereignty?
Is God a master puppeteer, pulling our strings? Or has he
graciously given his children freedom to respond to his love? In
this eminently readable book, Jerry L. Walls and Joseph R. Dongell
explore the flaws of Calvinist theology.Why I Am Not a Calvinist is
a must-read for all who struggle with the limitations of this
dominant perspective within evangelical theology.
In this classic, Augustine of Hippo describes how to interpret and
teach the Scriptures. Although written 1600 years ago, it considers
the role literal and allegorical interpreation of scripture, and is
particularly relevant today. A valuable, and readable resource for
preachers and teachers.
This guide serves as a valuable introduction to the documentary
heritage and tradition of the third largest group of protestants in
the southern United States. A companion to Harold Prince's A
Presbyterian Bibliography (1983), it locates and describes the
unpublished papers of PCUS ministers. It also documents the larger
southern tradition by including selected materials from the
antebellum period and from other Presbyterian denominations. The
result is a listing of resources for the study of the PCUS as well
as southern Presbyterianism. It aims to promote and encourage
research in Presbyterian history; to make files, diaries, sermons,
minutes, letters more intelligible; and finally, to emphasize the
continuing relevance of these materials in contemporary church
life. Robert Benedetto's forty-eight-page introduction includes a
survey of nine subject areas: theology, education, church and
society, international missions, national missions, women, racial
ethnic ministries, ecumenical relations, and worship and music.
Each area highlights major research and provides a concise
orientation to the life and mission of the denomination. Each
survey is followed by a brief listing of manuscript materials. The
Guide itself includes manuscript collections from the Department of
History (Montreat) and other repositories. This thorough volume
concludes with a bibliography of PCUS reference works and a
complete name and subject index.
Many interpreters argue that Karl Barth's rejection of the Roman
Catholic analogia entis was based upon a mistaken interpretation of
the principle, and many scholars also contend that late in his
career, Barth changed his mind about the analogia entis, either by
withdrawing his rejection of it or by adopting some form of it as
his own. This book challenges both views, and by doing so, it opens
up new avenues for ecumenical dialogue between Protestants and
Roman Catholics. In short, this book establishes that Barth did not
make a mistake when he rejected the analogia entis and that he also
never wavered on his critique of it; he did, however, change his
response to it-not by breaking with his earlier thought, but by
deepening it so that a true Christological dialogue could take
place between Protestant and Roman Catholic theologians. This
conclusion will be used to point the way to new terrain for
ecumenical dialogue in contemporary discussions.
|
|