|
|
Books > Humanities > History > European history > General
Translation of the Destruction of Czenstochow (Czestochowa, Poland)
is the English translation of the Yizkor (Memorial) Book published
in Buenos Aires, Argentina in 1949 in Yiddish by survivors and
former residents of the town. It details through personal accounts
the destruction of the Jewish community by the Nazis and their
Polish collaborators in World War II. This publication by the
"Yizkor Books in Print Project" of JewishGen, Inc., serves to
provide the English speaking community with these first-hand
accounts in book format, so that researchers and descendants of
Jewish emigrants from the town can learn this history. 200 pages
with Illustrations. Hard Cover Flight to Survival 1939-1945 by
Peninah Cypkewicz-Rosin is an excellent companion book because it
is a first-hand account of a young Jewish woman survivor of the
ghetto and the Hasag Labor Camp both in Czestochowa.
From 1789 onwards there sprang up a fervent revolutionary cult of
Rousseau, and at each stage in the subsequent unfolding of the
drama of the Revolution historians have seen Rousseau's influence
at work. Mrs McDonald seeks in this study to trace the development
of the cult and to define the nature of the influence by means of a
detailed survey of the appeals made to the authority of Rousseau in
books, pamphlets and accounts of speeches put forth by
revolutionary and counter-revolutionary writers between 1762 and
1791, and she reaches conclusions more complex than those which
have been commonly accepted. She is able to show that most of the
writers on the revolutionary side who invoked Rousseau's name did
so in order to put forward their own views and used arguments that
were often in direct contradiction with those which he had
formulated; the Social Contract was not widely read in these years,
and those revolutionaries who did actually study it were often
critical of what they found there. By contrast, the most careful
analysis of Rousseau's political theory is to be found in the
pamphlets written by aristocratic critics of the Revolution in
protest against the misuse to which his name had been put.
 |
For My Legionaries
(Hardcover)
Corneliu Zelea Codreanu; Introduction by Kerry Bolton; Contributions by Lucian Tudor
|
R907
Discovery Miles 9 070
|
Ships in 10 - 15 working days
|
|
|
These two accounts of the battle of Sedan in 1870 have been
combined for good value to enable readers to gain a balanced
overview of the action from different perspectives. What makes
these accounts particularly interesting is that they were written
not only by authors who were able to view the events without the
impediment of national bias, but because both were present on the
field of battle itself. So this excellent book offers the reader a
history, an analysis, first-hand eyewitness accounts, the accounts
and views of other witnesses and participants and a number of
anecdotes including those concerning General Sheridan. This most
significant of battles of the Franco-Prussian War came about as the
numerically superior French Army under MacMahon attempted to
relieve the siege of Metz. That attempt failed as the French were
defeated at Beaumont. Moltke, Bismarck and the king, Wilhelm I,
subsequently cornered the French at Sedan and surrounded them. The
Emperor, Napoleon III, was with the French forces and, unable to
escape, suffered the humiliation of both defeat and personal
capture. This battle typified the pattern of the Franco-Prussian
War which, following the lessons of the American Civil War, took
armed conflict on its first steps into the industrial age. All of
those lessons had been learnt by the Prussians and very few of them
by the French, whose view of warfare and especially of the
Prussians remained, to their cost, rooted in the experiences of
another Napoleon and entirely different French and Prussian Armies
in the days of the First Empire. Times had changed the French had
been out-planned, out-organised, out-manoeuvred and
out-gunned.
Leonaur editions are newly typeset and are not facsimiles; each
title is available in softcover and hardback with dustjacket; our
hardbacks are cloth bound and feature gold foil lettering on their
spines and fabric head and tail bands.
From the late imperial period until 1922, the British and French
made private and government loans to Russia, making it the foremost
international debtor country in pre-World War I Europe. To finance
the modernization of industry, the construction of public works
projects, railroad construction, and the development and adventures
of the military-industrial complex, Russia's ministers of finance,
municipal leaders, and nascent manufacturing class turned, time and
time again, to foreign capital. From the forging of the
Franco-Russian alliance onwards, Russia's needs were met, first and
foremost, its allies and diplomatic partners in the developing
Triple Entente. In the case of Russia's relationships with both
France and Great Britain, an open pocketbook primed the pump,
facilitating the good spirits that fostered agreement. Russia's
continued access to those ready lenders ensured that the empire of
the Tsars would not be tempted away from its alliance and entente
partners. This web of financial and political interdependence
affected both foreign policy and domestic society in all three
countries. The Russian state was so heavily indebted to its western
creditors, rendering those western economies almost prisoners to
this debt, that the debtor nation in many ways had the upper hand;
the Russian government at times was actually able to dictate policy
to its French and British counterparts. Those nations' investing
classes-which, in France in particular, spanned not only the upper
classes but the middle, rentier class, as well-had such a vast
proportion of their savings wrapped up in Russian bonds that any
default would have been catastrophic for their own economies. That
default came not long after the Bolshevik Revolution brought to
power a government who felt no responsibility whatsoever for the
debts accrued by the tsars for the purpose of oppressing Russia's
workers and peasants. The ensuing effect on allied morale, the
French and British economies and, ultimately, on the Anglo-French
relationship, was grim and far-reaching. This book will contribute
to understandings of the ways that non-governmental and sometimes
transnational actors were able to influence both British and French
foreign policy and Russian foreign and domestic policy. It will
address the role of individual financiers and policy makers-men
like Lord Revelstoke, chairman of Baring Brothers, the British and
French Rothschild cousins, Edouard Noetzlin of the Banque de Paris
et de Pays Bas, and Sergei Witte, Russia's authoritative finance
minister during much of this age of expansion; the importance of
foreign capital in late imperial Russian policy; and the particular
role of British capital and financial investment in the
construction and strengthening of the Anglo-Russo-French entente.
It will illustrate the interrelationship of political and economic
decision-making with the ideas and beliefs that inform security
policy. Drawing upon both the traditional archival sources for
diplomatic history-the government holdings of Great Britain,
France, and Russia-and the non-governmental archival holdings of
international finance-this project looks beyond the realm of high
politics and state-centered decision making in the formation of
foreign policy, offering insights into the forms and functions of
diplomatic alliances while elucidating the connections between
finance and foreign policy. It is a classic tale of money and power
in the modern era-an age of economic interconnectivity and great
power interdependency.
This book provides a bold examination of the political use of
history in contemporary Russia. Anton Weiss-Wendt argues that
history is yet another discipline misappropriated by the Kremlin
for the purpose of rallying the population. He explains how, since
the pro-democracy protests in 2011-12, the Russian government has
hamstrung independent research and aligned state institutions in
the promotion of militant patriotism. The entire state machinery
has been mobilized to construe a single, glorious historical
narrative with the focus on Soviet victory over Nazi Germany.
Putin's Russia and the Falsification of History examines the
intricate networks in Russia that engage in "historymaking."
Whether it is the Holocaust or Soviet mass terror, Tsars or Stalin,
the regime promotes a syncretic interpretation of Russian history
that supports the notion of a strong state and authoritarian rule.
That interpretation finds its way into new monuments, exhibitions,
and quasi-professional associations. In addition to administrative
measures of control, the Russian state has been using the penal
code to censor critical perspectives on history, typically advanced
by individuals who also happen to call for a political change in
Russia. This powerful book shows how history is increasingly
becoming an element of political technology in Russia, with the
systematic destruction of independent institutions setting the very
future of History as an academic discipline in Russia in doubt.
The fall of 2016 saw the release of the widely popular First World
War video game Battlefield 1. Upon the game's initial announcement
and following its subsequent release, Battlefield 1 became the
target of an online racist backlash that targeted the game's
inclusion of soldiers of color. Across social media and online
communities, players loudly proclaimed the historical inaccuracy of
black soldiers in the game and called for changes to be made that
correct what they considered to be a mistake that was influenced by
a supposed political agenda. Through the introduction of the
theoretical framework of the 'White Mythic Space', this book seeks
to investigate the reasons behind the racist rejection of soldiers
of color by Battlefield 1 players in order to answer the question:
Why do individuals reject the presence of people of African descent
in popular representations of history?
Drawing on recently declassified material from Stalin's personal
archive in Moscow, this is the first attempt by scholars to
systematically analyze the way Stalin interpreted and envisioned
his world-both the Soviet system he was trying to build and its
wider international context. Since Stalin rarely left his offices
and perceived the world largely through the prism of verbal and
written reports, meetings, articles, letters, and books, a
comprehensive analysis of these materials provides a unique and
valuable opportunity to study his way of thinking and his
interaction with the outside world. Comparing the materials that
Stalin read from week to week with the decisions that he
subsequently shaped, Sarah Davies and James Harris show not only
how Stalin perceived the world but also how he misperceived it.
After considering the often far-reaching consequences of those
misperceptions, they investigate Stalin's contribution to the
production and regulation of official verbal discourse in a system
in which huge political importance was attached to the correct use
of words and phrases..
Focusing on the era in which the modern idea of nationalism emerged
as a way of establishing the preferred political, cultural, and
social order for society, this book demonstrates that across
different European societies the most important constituent of
nationalism has been a specific understanding of the nation's
historical past. Analysing Ireland and Germany, two largely
unconnected societies in which the past was peculiarly contemporary
in politics and where the meaning of the nation was highly
contested, this volume examines how narratives of origins,
religion, territory and race produced by historians who were
central figures in the cultural and intellectual histories of both
countries interacted; it also explores the similarities and
differences between the interactions in these societies. Histories
of Nationalism in Ireland and Germany investigates whether we can
speak of a particular common form of nationalism in Europe. The
book draws attention to cultural and intellectual links between the
Irish and the Germans during this period, and what this meant for
how people in either society understood their national identity in
a pivotal time for the development of the historical discipline in
Europe. Contributing to a growing body of research on the
'transnationality' of nationalism, this new study of a
hitherto-unexplored area will be of interest to historians of
modern Germany and Ireland, comparative and transnational
historians, and students and scholars of nationalism, as well as
those interested in the relationship between biography and writing
history.
The Carolingian period represented a Golden Age for the abbey of St
Gall, an Alpine monastery in modern-day Switzerland. Its bloom of
intellectual activity resulted in an impressive number of scholarly
texts being copied into often beautifully written manuscripts, many
of which survive in the abbey's library to this day. Among these
books are several of Irish origin, while others contain works of
learning originally written in Ireland. This study explores the
practicalities of the spread of this Irish scholarship to St Gall
and the reception it received once there. In doing so, this book
for the first time investigates a part of the network of knowledge
that fed this important Carolingian centre of learning with
scholarship. By focusing on scholarly works from Ireland, this
study also sheds light on the contribution of the Irish to the
Carolingian revival of learning. Historians have often assumed a
special relationship between Ireland and the abbey of St Gall,
which was built on the grave of the Irish saint Gallus. This book
scrutinises this notion of a special connection. The result is a
new viewpoint on the spread and reception of Irish learning in the
Carolingian period.
This pivotal history of the kings of Sparta not only describes
their critical leadership in war, but also documents the waxing and
waning of their social, political, and religious powers in the
Spartan state. The Spartans have seemingly never gone out of
interest, serving as mythic icons who exemplify fearlessness and an
unwillingness to give in against impossible odds. Yet most are
unaware of the true nature of the Spartan leaders-the fact that the
kings maintained their position of power for 600 years by their
willingness to compromise, even if it meant giving up some of their
power, for example. Organized in a logical and chronological order,
Leonidas and the Kings of Sparta: Mightiest Warriors, Fairest
Kingdom describes the legendary origins of the dual kingship in
Sparta, documents the many reigning eras of the kings, and then
concludes with the time when the kingship was abolished six
centuries later. The book examines the kings' roles in war and
battle, in religion, in the social life of the city, and in
formulating Spartan policy both at home and abroad. No other book
on Sparta has concentrated on describing the role of the kings-and
their absolutely essential contributions to Spartan society in
general. Numerous translations by the author of original sources
Chronology history from the Dorian Invasion (ca. 1000 BC) to the
last king of Sparta (mid-2nd century BC) Illustrations of the kings
of Sparta, gods, and heroes, as well as diagrams of battles and
family trees Maps of Laconia, the Peloponnesus, and Greece A
bibliography containing ancient and modern sources for Sparta
New Age culture is generally regarded as a modern manifestation of
Western millenarianism - a concept built around the expectation of
an imminent historical crisis followed by the inauguration of a
golden age which occupies a key place in the history of Western
ideas. The New Age in the Modern West argues that New Age culture
is part of a family of ideas, including utopianism, which construct
alternative futures and drive revolutionary change. Nicholas
Campion traces New Age ideas back to ancient cosmology, and
questions the concepts of the Enlightenment and the theory of
progress. He considers the contributions of the key figures of the
18th century, the legacy of the astronomer Isaac Newton and the
Swedish visionary Emanuel Swedenborg, as well as the theosophist,
H.P. Blavatsky, the psychologist, C.G. Jung, and the writer and
artist, Jose Arguelles. He also pays particular attention to the
beat writers of the 1950s, the counterculture of the 1960s,
concepts of the Aquarian Age and prophecies of the end of the Maya
Calendar in 2012. Lastly he examines neoconservatism as both a
reaction against the 1960s and as a utopian phenomenon. The New Age
in the Modern West is an important book for anyone interested in
countercultural and revolutionary ideas in the modern West.
This book documents dictator Joseph Stalin's brilliant tactics as
well as missteps in taking preemptive actions that guaranteed
ultimate victory over the German invaders. It also covers the
policies implemented after the war that made the Soviet Union a
menace to world peace and led to collapse of Soviet rule. A
detailed reexamination of historical facts indicates that Stalin
could deserve to be regarded as a "great leader." Yet Stalin
clearly failed as his nation's leader in a post-World War II
milieu, where he delivered the Cold War instead of rapid progress
and global cooperation. It is the proof of both Stalin's brilliance
and blunders that makes him such a fascinating figure in modern
history. Today, most of the Russian population acknowledges that
Stalin achieved "greatness." The Soviet dictator's honored place in
history is largely due to Stalin successfully attending to the
Soviet Union's defense needs in the 1930s and 1940s, and leading
the USSR to victory in the war on the Eastern Front against Nazi
Germany and its allies. This book provides an overdue critical
investigation of how the Soviet leader's domestic and foreign
policies actually helped produce this victory, and above all, how
Stalin's timely support of a wartime alliance with the Western
capitalist democracies assured the defeat of the Axis powers in
1945. Using new archive and other original source material, this
book documents how dictator Josef Stalin adroitly prepared for
"assured victory" in World War II Canvasses not only Western
literature on Stalin's prewar, wartime, and postwar leadership, but
also examines current post-2004 Russian histories
Migrations and border issues are now matters of great interest and
importance. This book examines the ways in which Hungary has
adapted to regional and global requirements while seeking to meet
its own needs. It adds to the literature a case study, the only one
of its kind, showing the evolution of a single set of borders over
a century in response to a wide range of internal and external
forces in a regional and global context. The narrative illuminates
the complexities, opportunities, and problems that face a small
state that finds itself often on the edge. Twentieth century
Europe's borders have repeatedly been dismantled, moved, and
refashioned. Hungary, even more than Germany, exemplifies border
decomposition, re-creation, destruction, "Sovietization," and
resurrection in a new Central Europe. Facing one way, then the
other, its past includes a conflicting self image as a bastion of
the west and as a bridge between east and west, as well as a long
and unwilling period as a defender of the east.
When the Romans adopted Greek literary genres, artistic techniques,
and iconographies, they did not slavishly imitate their models.
Rather, the Romans created vibrant and original literature and art.
The same is true for philosophy, though the rich Roman
philosophical tradition is still too often treated as a mere
footnote to the history of Greek philosophy. This volume aims to
reassert the significance of Roman philosophy and to explore the
"Romanness" of philosophical writings and practices in the Roman
world. The contributors reveal that the Romans, in their creative
adaptation of Greek modes of thought, developed sophisticated forms
of philosophical discourse shaped by their own history and
institutions, concepts and values-and last, but not least, by the
Latin language, which nearly all Roman philosophers used to express
their ideas. The thirteen chapters-which are authored by an
international group of specialists in ancient philosophy, Latin
literature, and Roman social and intellectual history-move from
Roman attitudes to and practices of philosophy to the great late
Republican writers Cicero and Lucretius, then onwards to the early
Empire and the work of Seneca the Younger, and finally to
Epictetus, Apuleius, and Augustine. Using a variety of approaches,
the essays do not combine into one grand narrative but instead
demonstrate the diversity and originality of the Roman
philosophical discourse over the centuries.
The Contested History of Autonomy examines the concept of autonomy
in modern times. It presents the history of modernity as
constituted by the tension between sovereignty and autonomy and
offers a critical interpretation of European modernity from a
global perspective. The book shows, in contrast to the standard
view of its invention, that autonomy (re)emerged as a defining
quality of modernity in early modern Europe. Gerard Rosich looks at
how the concept is first used politically, in opposition to the
rival concept of sovereignty, as an attribute of a collective-self
in struggle against imperial domination. Subsequently the book
presents a range of historical developments as significant events
in the history of imperialism which are connected at once with the
consolidation of the concept of sovereignty and with a western view
of modernity. Additionally, the book provides an interpretation of
the history of globalization based on this connection. Rosich
discusses the conceptual shortcomings and historical inadequacy of
the traditional western view of modernity against the background of
recent breakthroughs in world history. In doing so, it reconstructs
an alternative interpretation of modernity associated with the
history of autonomy as it appeared in early modern Europe, before
looking to the present and the ongoing tension between
'sovereignty' and 'autonomy' that exists. This is a groundbreaking
study that will be of immense value to scholars researching modern
Europe and its relationship with the World.
|
|