|
|
Books > Humanities > Religion & beliefs > Christianity > The Bible > Old Testament > General
Volume three 'Companion to Textual Criticism' addresses the history
of research of textual criticism from antiquity until today;
history of research and editorial history, papyrology, codicology,
and paleography, the third volume of THB will therefore engage also
extensively with the sciences, hermeneutics, philosophy and
translation technique. Table of contents of THB 3: Volume 3A The
History of Research by Armin Lange and Russell E. Fuller: surveys
the history of research on the textual criticism and textual
history of the Hebrew Bible and its versions in both Judaism and
Christianity from its ancient beginnings until today for all of its
important versions. Volume 3B Modern Editions of the Text of the
Bible in Hebrew and the Ancient Versions by Richard D. Weis (d.
2020) Volume 3C Theory and Practice of Textual Criticism by Mika
Pajunen Volume 3D Science and Technology by Marilyn Lundberg
Since Freud, the study of dreams has typically involved inquiry
into past and present emotional states. The ancients, unfamiliar
with the intricate byways of the human soul revealed by modern
psychology, typically saw dreams as channels of communication
between human beings and external sources. Shaul Bar explores the
etymology of key terms for dreams in the Hebrew Bible, presents
dozens of examples of biblical dreams and visions, and categorizes
them as prophetic, symbolic, or incubation. He studies biblical
dreams and visions in the context of similar phenomena in the
literature of neighboring cultures and analyzes the functions of
dream reports in the biblical corpus. The literature of dream
interpretation in Egypt and Mesopotamia informs Bar's treatment of
the structure of dream accounts as conforming to the three-part
model (setting, message, response) proposed for ancient Near
Eastern dream accounts in A. Leo Oppenheim's classic work on dream
interpretation. Symbolic dreams, whether or not God is their
source, contain no divine appearance and require interpretation to
be understood. While oneiro-criticism was a significant profession
in ancient Near Eastern cultures, the Hebrew Bible presents only
two such experts, Joseph and Daniel. Both were active in royal
courts, and the success of both in interpreting the rulers' dreams
served to confirm the superiority of the God of Israel. Ambivalence
characterizes the attitude toward dreams and visions in prophetic
literature. Joel and Job allow that they have some value. But
Jeremiah, Zechariah, Isaiah, and Ecclesiates find no religious
significance in them and even treat them as tools of deceit. The
Talmud presents no consensus about whether dreams are a legitimate
form of communication from God. Although a guild of professional
interpreters existed in Jerusalem and the Talmud includes a short
dream book, many Sages expressed skepticism about such alleged
divine messages. Dreams also serve important functions within the
literary world of the Hebrew Bible. Bar shows how Jacob's dream at
Bethel serves to explain the sanctity of the place and detach it
from its Canaanite context, how the dreams in the Joseph cycle show
the hand of divine providence in the descent to Egypt followed by
the ascent to the Promised Land, how Solomon's dream at Gibeon
serves to legitimate Solomon's rule, and how Nebuchadnezzar's
dreams served to emphasize once again that it is the Lord who
guides universal history.
Die vorliegende neue Auflage des Gesenius'schen Woerterbuches, die
funfte von meiner Hand, wird voraussichtlich die letzte sein, die
ich bearbeite. Schon deswegen wird man es gewiss begreiflich
finden, dall ich, nachdem ich ziemlich viel Zeit und Arbeit an dies
Buch ge wendet habe, nicht gesonnen gewesen bin, durch eine
vollstii. ndige Umgestaltung ein ganz neues oder gar, wie
vorgeschlagen worden ist. zwei neue Bucher daraus zu machen. Eine
derartige radikale Umarbeitung muss, falls sie noetig erscheinen
sollte, einem kunftigen Herausgeber uber lassen werden. Ich moechte
aber wegen des Interesses, das ich fur das Buch hege, die Gelegen
heit benutzen, ausdrucklich hervorzuheben, dall der Gedanke, den
lexikalischen Stoff auf zwei Ausgaben, ein kurzes Handbuch fur
praktische Zwecke und einen umfangreichen "Thesaurus" zu verteilen,
mir recht wenig zweckmassig zu sein scheint. In seiner jetzigen
Form sind die letzten Auflagen des Buches ziemlich rasch,
durchschnittlich nach vier bis funf Jahren, auf einander gefolgt,
und es ist dadurch moeglich gewesen, fortwahrend die neueste
Literatur zu berucksichtigen und die neuen Funde und Entdeckungen
zu verwerten. Es liegt aber in der Natur der Sache, dass ein kurzes
Handbuch von diesem uberreichen Stoffe nur einen sehr be grenzten
Teil aufnehmen koennte, wahrend andererseits ein umfangreicher, auf
den gelehrten Gebrauch berechneter Thesaurus, selbst wenn er nicht
das ehrwurdige Alter des vortrefflichen Gesenius'schen Thesaurus
von Anno 1835 zu erreichen brauchte, doch mit weit la.
ngerenZwischen raumen erscheinen wurde.
|
|