|
Books > Social sciences > Warfare & defence > Other warfare & defence issues
This innovative collection offers one of the first analyses of
criminologies of the military from an interdisciplinary
perspective. While some criminologists have examined the military
in relation to the area of war crimes, this collection considers a
range of other important but less explored aspects such as private
military actors, insurgents, paramilitary groups and the role of
military forces in tackling transnational crime. Drawing upon
insights from criminology, this book's editors also consider the
ways the military institution harbours criminal activity within its
ranks and deals with prisoners of war. The contributions, by
leading experts in the field, have a broad reach and take a truly
global approach to the subject.
Eminent jurists, professional legal organizations, and human
rights monitors in this country and around the world have declared
that President George W. Bush may be prosecuted as a war criminal
when he leaves office for his overt and systematic violations of
such international law as the Geneva and Hague Conventions and such
US law as the War Crimes Act, the Anti-Torture Act, and federal
assault laws. "George W. Bush, War Criminal?" identifies and
documents 269 specific war crimes under US and international law
for which President Bush, senior officials and staff in his
administration, and military officers under his command are liable
to be prosecuted. Haas divides the 269 war crimes of the Bush
administration into four classes: 6 war crimes committed in
launching a war of aggression; 36 war crimes committed in the
conduct of war; 175 war crimes committed in the treatment of
prisoners; and 52 war crimes committed in postwar occupations.
For each of the 269 war crimes of the Bush administration,
Professor Haas gives chapter and verse in precise but non-technical
language, including the specific acts deemed to be war crimes, the
names of the officials deemed to be war criminals, and the exact
language of the international or domestic laws violated by those
officials. The author proceeds to consider the various US,
international, and foreign tribunals in which the war crimes of
Bush administration defendants may be tried under applicable bodies
of law. He evaluates the real-world practicability of bringing
cases against Bush and Bush officials in each of the possible
venues. Finally, he weighs the legal, political, and humanitarian
pros and cons of actually bringing Bush and Bush officials to trial
for war crimes.
This important book analyzes nuclear weapon and energy policies in
Asia, a region at risk for high-stakes military competition,
conflict, and terrorism. The contributors explore the trajectory of
debates over nuclear energy, security, and nonproliferation in key
countries-China, India, Japan, Pakistan, South Korea, Taiwan,
Vietnam, and other states in the Association of Southeast Asian
Nations (ASEAN). Arguing against conventional wisdom, the
contributors make a convincing case that domestic variables are far
more powerful than external factors in shaping nuclear decision
making. The book explores what drives debates and how decisions are
framed, the interplay between domestic dynamics and geopolitical
calculations in the discourse, where the center of gravity of
debates lies in each country, and what this means for regional
cooperation or competition and U.S. nuclear energy and
nonproliferation policy in Asia.
During the twentieth century, witnessing grew to be not just a
widespread solution for coping with political atrocities but also
an intricate problem. As the personal experience of victims,
soldiers, and aid workers acquired unparalleled authority as a
source of moral and political truth, the capacity to generate
adequate testimonies based on this experience was repeatedly called
into question. Michal Givoni's book follows the trail of the
problems, torments, and crises that became commingled with
witnessing to genocide, disaster, and war over the course of the
twentieth century. By juxtaposing episodes of reflexive witnessing
to the Great War, the Jewish Holocaust, and third world
emergencies, The Care of the Witness explores the shifting roles
and responsibilities of witnesses in history and the contribution
that the troubles of witnessing made to the ethical consolidation
of the witness as the leading figure of nongovernmental politics.
This book explores the diverse ways in which Holocaust
representations have influenced and structured how other genocides
are understood and represented in the West. Rebecca Jinks focuses
in particular on the canonical 20th century cases of genocide:
Armenia, Cambodia, Bosnia, and Rwanda. Using literature, film,
photography, and memorialisation, she demonstrates that we can only
understand the Holocaust's status as a 'benchmark' for other
genocides if we look at the deeper, structural resonances which
subtly shape many representations of genocide. Representing
Genocide pursues five thematic areas in turn: how genocides are
recognised as such by western publics; the representation of the
origins and perpetrators of genocide; how western witnesses
represent genocide; representations of the aftermath of genocide;
and western responses to genocide. Throughout, the book
distinguishes between 'mainstream' and other, more nuanced and
engaged, representations of genocide. It shows how these mainstream
representations - the majority - largely replicate the
representational framework of the Holocaust, including the way in
which mainstream Holocaust representations resist recognising the
rationality, instrumentality and normality of genocide, preferring
instead to present it as an aberrant, exceptional event in human
society. By contrast, the more engaged representations - often, but
not always, originating from those who experienced genocide - tend
to revolve around precisely genocide's ordinariness, and the
structures and situations common to human society which contribute
to and become involved in the violence.
The wolf you feed refers to a powerful Native American metaphor.
Feeding the good wolf builds a moral and social order of inclusion
and tolerance, whereas feeding the bad wolf leads to fear, hatred,
exclusion, and violence. You must decide which wolf to feed. E.N.
Anderson and Barbara A. Anderson use this metaphor to examine
complicity in genocide. Anderson and Anderson argue that everyday
frustration and fear, combined with hatred and social othering
toward rivals and victims of discrimination, are powerful
precursors to conforming to genocide and the very tools that
genocidal leaders use to instigate hatred. Anderson and Anderson
examine why individuals and whole nations become complicit in
genocide. They propose powerful actions that can both protect
against complicity and create social change, as exemplified from
populations recovering from genocidal regimes. This book is
targeted toward scholars and persons who are interested in
understanding genocidal complicity and examining social strategies
to counteract it.
Using a new approach to ethnicity that underscores its relative
territoriality, H. Zeynep Bulutgil brings together previously
separate arguments that focus on domestic and international factors
to offer a coherent theory of what causes ethnic cleansing. The
author argues that domestic obstacles based on non-ethnic cleavages
usually prevent ethnic cleansing whereas territorial conflict
triggers this policy by undermining such obstacles. The empirical
analysis combines statistical evaluation based on original data
with comprehensive studies of historical cases in Central and
Eastern Europe, as well as Bosnia, in the 1990s. The findings
demonstrate how socio-economic cleavages curb radical factions
within dominant groups whereas territorial wars strengthen these
factions and pave the way for ethnic cleansing. The author further
explores the theoretical and empirical extensions in the context of
Africa. Its theoretical novelty and broad empirical scope make this
book highly valuable to scholars of comparative and international
politics alike.
A Times Literary Supplement Book of the Year A riveting account of
a forgotten holocaust: the slaughter of over one hundred thousand
Ukrainian Jews in the aftermath of the Russian Revolution. In the
Midst of Civilized Europe repositions the pogroms as a defining
moment of the twentieth century. 'Exhaustive, clearly written,
deeply researched' - The Times 'A meticulous, original and deeply
affecting historical account' - Philippe Sands, author of East West
Street Between 1918 and 1921, over a hundred thousand Jews were
murdered in Ukraine by peasants, townsmen, and soldiers who blamed
the Jews for the turmoil of the Russian Revolution. In hundreds of
separate incidents, ordinary people robbed their Jewish neighbors
with impunity, burned down their houses, ripped apart their Torah
scrolls, sexually assaulted them, and killed them. Largely
forgotten today, these pogroms - ethnic riots - dominated headlines
and international affairs in their time. Aid workers warned that
six million Jews were in danger of complete extermination. Twenty
years later, these dire predictions would come true. Drawing upon
long-neglected archival materials, including thousands of newly
discovered witness testimonies, trial records, and official orders,
acclaimed historian Jeffrey Veidlinger shows for the first time how
this wave of genocidal violence created the conditions for the
Holocaust. Through stories of survivors, perpetrators, aid workers,
and governmental officials, he explains how so many different
groups of people came to the same conclusion: that killing Jews was
an acceptable response to their various problems.
Reverberations of Nazi Violence in Germany and Beyond explores the
complex and diverse reverberations of the Second World War after
1945. It focuses on the legacies that National Socialist violence
and genocide perpetrated in Europe continue to have in
German-speaking countries and communities, as well as among those
directly affected by occupation, terror and mass murder.
Furthermore it explores how those legacies are in turn shaped by
the present. The volume also considers conflicting, unexpected and
often dissonant interpretations and representations of these
events, made by those who were the witnesses, victims and
perpetrators at the time and also by different communities in the
generations that followed. The contributions, from a range of
disciplinary perspectives, enrich our understanding of the
complexity of the ways in which a disturbing past continues to
disrupt the present and how the past is in turn disturbed and
instrumentalized by a later present.
This book explores the history of Dartmoor War Prison (1805-16).
This is not the well-known Victorian convict prison, but a less
familiar penal institution, conceived and built nearly half a
century earlier in the midst of the long-running wars against
France, and destined, not for criminals, but for French and later
American prisoners of war. During a period of six and a half years,
more than 20,000 captives passed through its gates. Drawing on
contemporary official records from Britain, France and the USA, and
a wealth of prisoners' letters, diaries and memoirs (many of them
studied here in detail for the first time), this book examines how
Dartmoor War Prison was conceived and designed; how it was
administered both from London and on the ground; how the fate of
its prisoners intertwined with the military and diplomatic history
of the period; and finally how those prisoners interacted with each
other, with their captors, and with the wider community. The
history of the prison on the moor is one marked by high hopes and
noble intentions, but also of neglect, hardship, disease and death
|
|