|
|
Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Political activism > Pressure groups & lobbying
The Fourth Ordeal tells the history of the Muslim Brotherhood in
Egypt from the late 1960s until 2018. Based on over 140 first-hand
interviews with leaders, rank-and-file members and dissidents, as
well as a wide range of original written sources, the story traces
the Brotherhood's re-emergence and rise following the collapse of
Nasser's Arab nationalism, all the way to its short-lived
experiment with power and the subsequent period of imprisonment,
persecution and exile. Unique in terms of its source base, this
book provides readers with unprecedented insight into the
Brotherhood's internal politics during fifty years of its history.
'As a movement for social change it is important that we understand
our own history. This is a compelling read.' From the anti-roads
protests of the 1990s to HS2 and Extinction Rebellion, conflict and
protest have shaped the politics of transport. In 1989, Margaret
Thatcher's government announced 'the biggest road-building
programme since the Romans.' This is the inside story of the thirty
tumultuous years that have followed. Roads, Runways and Resistance
draws on over 50 interviews with government ministers, advisors and
protestors - many of whom, including 'Swampy', speak here for the
first time about the events they describe. It is a story of
transport ministers undermined by their own Prime Ministers,
protestors attacked or quietly supported by the police, and
smartly-dressed protestors who found a way onto the roof of the
Houses of Parliament. Today, as a new wave of road building and
airport expansion threatens to bust Britain's carbon budgets,
climate change protestors find themselves on a collision course
with the government. Melia asks, what difference did the protests
of the past make? And what impacts might today's protest movements
have on the transport of the future?
Do small but wealthy interest groups influence referendums,
ballot initiatives, and other forms of direct legislation at the
expense of the broader public interest? Many observers argue that
they do, often lamenting that direct legislation has,
paradoxically, been captured by the very same wealthy interests
whose power it was designed to curb. Elisabeth Gerber, however,
challenges that argument. In this first systematic study of how
money and interest group power actually affect direct legislation,
she reveals that big spending does not necessarily mean big
influence.
Gerber bases her findings on extensive surveys of the activities
and motivations of interest groups and on close examination of
campaign finance records from 168 direct legislation campaigns in
eight states. Her research confirms what such wealthy interests as
the insurance industry, trial lawyer associations, and tobacco
companies have learned by defeats at the ballot box: if citizens do
not like a proposed new law, even an expensive, high-profile
campaign will not make them change their mind. She demonstrates,
however, that these economic interest groups have considerable
success in using direct legislation to block initiatives that
others are proposing and to exert pressure on politicians. By
contrast, citizen interest groups with broad-based support and
significant organizational resources have proven to be extremely
effective in using direct legislation to pass new laws. Clearly
written and argued, this is a major theoretical and empirical
contribution to our understanding of the role of citizens and
organized interests in the American legislative process.
A major work by one of America's most eminent political scientists,
"Political Organizations" has had a profound impact on how we view
the influence of interest groups on policy making. James Q. Wilson
wrote this book to counter two ideas: that popular interests will
automatically generate political organizations and that such
organizations will faithfully mirror the opinions and interests of
their members. Moreover, he demonstrated that the way in which
political organizations (including parties, business groups, labor
unions, and civil rights associations) are created and maintained
significantly affects the opinions they represent and the tactics
they use. Now available for the first time in paperback, this book
has broadened its scope to include recently developed organizations
as it addresses many of today's concerns over the power of such
groups as special-interests lobbies.
In 1973, when this book was first published, the press and
public were fascinated by the social movements of the 1960s,
thinking that the antiwar and civil rights movements might sweep
aside old-fashioned interest-group lobbies. Wilson argued, however,
that such movements would inevitably be supplanted by new
organizations, ones with goals and tactics that might direct the
course of action away from some of the movement's founding
principles. In light of the current popular distress with
special-interest groups and their supposed death-grip on Congress,
Wilson again attempts to modify a widely held view. He shows that
although lobbies have multiplied in number and kind, they remain
considerably restrained by the difficulty they have in maintaining
themselves. His approach charts a useful middle course between the
pluralist and the rational-choice schools of thought.
What would an Anti-Federalist Constitution look like? Because we
view the Constitution through the lens of the Federalists who came
to control the narrative, we tend to forget those who opposed its
ratification. And yet the Anti-Federalist arguments, so critical to
an understanding of the Constitution's origins and meaning,
resonate throughout American history. By reconstructing these
arguments and tracing their development through the ratification
debates, Michael J. Faber presents an alternative perspective on
constitutional history. Telling, in a sense, the other side of the
story of the Constitution, his book offers key insights into the
ideas that helped to form the nation's founding document and that
continue to inform American politics and public life.Faber
identifies three distinct strands of political thought that
eventually came together in a clear and coherent Anti-Federalism
position: (1) the individual and the potential for governmental
tyranny; (2) power, specifically the states as defenders of the
people; and (3) democratic principles and popular sovereignty.
After clarifying and elaborating these separate strands of thought
and analyzing a well-known proponent of each, Faber goes on to tell
the story of the resistance to the Constitution, focusing on ideas
but also following and explaining events and strategies. Finally,
he produces a "counterfactual" Anti-Federalist Constitution,
summing up the Anti-Federalist position as it might have emerged
had the opposition drafted the document. How would such a
constitution have worked in practice? A close consideration reveals
the legacy of the Anti-Federalists in early American history, in
the US Constitution and its role in the nation's political life.
In June 1964, over one thousand volunteers--most of them white,
northern college students--arrived in Mississippi to register black
voters and staff "freedom schools" as part of the Freedom Summer
campaign organized by the Student Non-Violent Coordinating
Committee. Within ten days, three of them were murdered; by the
summer's end, another had died and hundreds more had endured
bombings, beatings, and arrests. Less dramatically, but no less
significantly, the volunteers encountered a "liberating" exposure
to new lifestyles, new political ideologies, and a radically new
perspective on America and on themselves.
Films such as Mississippi Burning have attempted to document this
episode in the civil rights era, but Doug McAdam offers the first
book to gauge the impact of Freedom Summer on the project
volunteers and the period we now call "the turbulent sixties."
Tracking down hundreds of the original project applicants, and
combining hard data with a wealth of personal recollections, he has
produced a riveting portrait of the people, the events, and the
era. McAdam discovered that during Freedom Summer, the volunteers'
encounters with white supremacist violence and their experiences
with interracial relationships, communal living, and a more open
sexuality led many of them to "climb aboard a political and
cultural wave just as it was forming and beginning to wash
forward." Many became activists in subsequent protests--including
the antiwar movement and the feminist movement--and, most
significantly, many of them have remained activists to this
day.
Brimming with the reminiscences of the Freedom Summer veterans,
the book captures the varied motives that compelled them to make
thejourney south, the terror that came with the explosions of
violence, the camaraderie and conflicts they experienced among
themselves, and their assorted feelings about the lessons they
learned.
'Commendable - a book that prepares us to think about and react to
system failures' - Peter Gelderloos Anarchists have been central in
helping communities ravaged by disasters, stepping in when
governments wash their hands of the victims. Looking at Hurricane
Sandy, Covid-19, and the social movements that mobilised relief in
their wake, Disaster Anarchy is an inspiring and alarming book
about collective solidarity in an increasingly dangerous world. As
climate change and neoliberalism converge, mutual aid networks,
grassroots direct action, occupations and brigades have sprung up
in response to this crisis with considerable success. Occupy Sandy
was widely acknowledged to have organised relief more effectively
than federal agencies or NGOs, and following Covid-19 the term
'mutual aid' entered common parlance. However, anarchist-inspired
relief has not gone unnoticed by government agencies. Their
responses include surveillance, co-option, extending at times to
violent repression involving police brutality. Arguing that
disaster anarchy is one of the most important political phenomena
to emerge in the twenty-first century, Rhiannon Firth shows through
her research on and within these movements that anarchist theory
and practice is needed to protect ourselves from the disasters of
our unequal and destructive economic system.
In the wake of the Arab uprisings, al-Nahda voted to transform
itself into a political party that would for the first time
withdraw from a preaching project built around religious, social,
and cultural activism. This turn to the political was not a
Tunisian exception but reflects an urgent debate within Islamist
movements as they struggle to adjust to a rapidly changing
political environment. This book re-orientates how we think about
Islamist movements. Drawing on extensive fieldwork with grassroots
activists of Tunisia's al-Nahda, Rory McCarthy focuses on the lived
experience of activism to offer a challenging new perspective on
one of the Middle East's most successful Islamist projects.
Original evidence explains how al-Nahda survived two decades of
brutal repression in prison and in social exclusion, and reveals
what price the movement paid for a new strategy of pragmatism and
reform during the Tunisian transition away from authoritarianism.
|
|