|
Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Political activism > Pressure groups & lobbying
Finalist: Lambda Literary Award for LBGTQ Nonfiction. Far from the
coastal centers of culture and politics, Kansas stands at the very
center of American stereotypes about red states. In the American
imagination, it is a place LGBT people leave. No Place Like Home is
about why they stay. The book tells the epic story of how a few
disorganized and politically naive Kansans, realizing they were
unfairly under attack, rolled up their sleeves, went looking for
fights, and ended up making friends in one of the country's most
hostile states. The LGBT civil rights movement's history in
California and in big cities such as New York and Washington, DC,
has been well documented. But what is it like for LGBT activists in
a place like Kansas, where they face much stiffer headwinds? How do
they win hearts and minds in the shadow of the Westboro Baptist
Church ( Christian" motto: "God Hates Fags")? Traveling the state
in search of answers-from city to suburb to farm-journalist C. J.
Janovy encounters LGBT activists who have fought, in ways big and
small, for the acceptance and respect of their neighbors, their
communities, and their government. Her book tells the story of
these twenty-first-century citizen activists-the issues that unite
them, the actions they take, and the personal and larger
consequences of their efforts, however successful they might be.
With its close-up view of the lives and work behind LGBT activism
in Kansas, No Place Like Home fills a prairie-sized gap in the
narrative of civil rights in America. The book also looks forward,
as an inspiring guide for progressives concerned about the future
of any vilified minority in an increasingly polarized nation.
"Annex One is an Interesting, Well-Researched and Well-Argued Book.
It Deals with Pressing Matters of Great Public Interest." A.W.
September 2018. Observations of In Defence of Justice - Israel And
The Palestinians: The Identification Of Truth O.H. 3-9-2013. "An
amazing and excellent book. Simply written producing a clear
overall picture..." P.R. 3-9-2013. "Fascinating book. I thought I
was well informed but the book clearly showed up my lack of
knowledge..." M.S. 3-9-2013. "At long last a book which properly
identifies and uses the truth against the propaganda machines of
the West that seek to undermine the nation of Israel." M.A.
15-9-2013. "Only a barrister could write such a remarkable
work...... The answer (to the) obvious question as Malcolm Sinclair
has made clear..." W.G. 19-10-2014. "I found your book riveting,
and I am sorry that it does not have a wider advertised
publication, as it should. If I were in a position to do so
financially, I would make sure it did. This book deserves far
greater publicity."
Spurred by the disconnect between what was being taught in the
classroom and actual practice, Godwin, Ainsworth, and Godwin set
out to answer the question, "Was political science missing some key
aspects of the interactions between lobbyists and policy makers?"
Built on interviews with over 100 lobbyists, these authors show
that much of the research on organized interests overlooks the
lobbying of regulatory agencies even though it accounts for almost
half of all lobbying-even though bureaucratic agencies have
considerable leeway in the how they choose to implement law. This
groundbreaking new book argues that lobbying activity is not mainly
a struggle among competing interests over highly collective goods;
rather, it's the public provision of private goods. And more to the
point, this shift in understanding influences our perception of the
strengths and weaknesses of American democracy. Through a series of
highly readable case studies, the authors employ both neopluralist
and exchange perspectives to explore the lobbying activity that
occurs in the later stages of the policymaking process which are
typically less partisan, involve little conflict, and receive scant
public attention. Lobbying and Policymaking sheds new light on
lobbying influence on the policy process, and is an ideal way to
expose students to cutting-edge research in an accessible,
fascinating package.
Successive authoritarian regimes have maintained tight control over
organized labor in Egypt since the 1950s. And yet in 2009, a group
of civil servants decided to exit the state-controlled Egyptian
Trade Union Federation (ETUF), thereby setting a precedent for
other groups and threatening the ETUF's monopoly. Dina Bishara
examines this relationship between labour organizations and the
state to shed light on how political change occurs within an
authoritarian government, and to show how ordinary Egyptians
perceive the government's rule. In particular, Bishara highlights
the agency of dissident unionists in challenging the state even
when trade union leaders remain loyal. She reveals that militant
sectors are more vulnerable to greater scrutiny and repression and
that financial benefits tied to membership in state-backed unions
can provide significant disincentives against the exit option.
Moving beyond conventional accounts of top-down control, this book
explores when and how institutions designed for political control
become contested from below.
Kill the Boer: Government complicity in South Africa’s brutal farm
murders by the activist, attorney and deputy CEO of the civil
rights organisation AfriForum, Ernst Roets, lays bare the brutal
reality of farm attacks in South Africa. Among other things it
investigates the level of complicity in the crisis by the South
African government. The book reveals accounts of direct involvement
of members of the ruling ANC, the South African government and the
South African Police Service (SAPS) in the planning and execution
of farm attacks. Roets also argues that the South African media is
complicit as analyses of news reports strongly point towards biased
reporting on the issue of farm attacks and farm murders. Kill the
Boer outlines the reasons why farm attacks are unique and why it
deserves to be regarded as a priority crime. Roets has been
actively campaigning for the prioritising of farm attacks since
2012.
|
|