Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy > Epistemology, theory of knowledge
|
Buy Now
Righting Epistemology - Hume's Revolution (Hardcover)
Loot Price: R2,680
Discovery Miles 26 800
|
|
Righting Epistemology - Hume's Revolution (Hardcover)
Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days
|
David Hume launched a historic revolution in epistemology when he
showed that our theories about the world have no probability
relative to what we think of as our evidence for them, hence that
the distinction between justified and unjustified theories does not
lie in their different probabilities relative to that evidence.
However, allies in his revolution appeared only in the 20th
century, in the persons of Sir Karl Popper, Nelson Goodman and W.
V. Quine. Hume's second great contribution to the field, which
remains unrecognized to this day, was to propose what is now known
as reflective equilibrium theory as the framework within which
justified and unjustified theories are rightly distinguished. The
core of this book comprises an account of these developments from
Hume to Quine, an extension of reflective equilibrium theory that
renders it a general theory of epistemic justification concerning
our beliefs about the world, and an argument that all four of these
thinkers would have endorsed that extension. In chapters on Sextus,
Descartes, Wittgenstein's On Certainty, and other aspects of Hume's
epistemology I defend new readings of those philosophers' writings
on skepticism and note significant relationships among their views
on matters bearing on the Humean revolution. Finally, in chapters
on Hilary Putnam's "Brains in a Vat" and Fred Dretske's
contextualism - the only promising version of that view - I show
that both fail to rule out the possible truth of radical skeptical
hypotheses. This is not surprising, since those hypotheses are in
fact possible. They are not, however, of any epistemological
significance, since the justification of our beliefs about the
world is a function of the extent to which bodies of beliefs to
which they belong are in reflective equilibrium, and no extant
conception of knowledge is of any epistemological interest.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
You might also like..
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.