One of the most vexing problems for governments is building
controversial facilities that serve the needs of all citizens but
have adverse consequences for host communities. Policymakers must
decide not only where to locate often unwanted projects but also
what methods to use when interacting with opposition groups. In
Site Fights, Daniel P. Aldrich gathers quantitative evidence from
close to five hundred municipalities across Japan to show that
planners deliberately seek out acquiescent and unorganized
communities for such facilities in order to minimize conflict.
When protests arise over nuclear power plants, dams, and
airports, agencies regularly rely on the coercive powers of the
modern state, such as land expropriation and police repression.
Only under pressure from civil society do policymakers move toward
financial incentives and public relations campaigns. Through
fieldwork and interviews with bureaucrats and activists, Aldrich
illustrates these dynamics with case studies from Japan, France,
and the United States. The incidents highlighted in Site Fights
stress the importance of developing engaged civil society even in
the absence of crisis, thereby making communities both less
attractive to planners of controversial projects and more effective
at resisting future threats.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!