Boyle s Law, which describes the relation between the pressure
and volume of a gas, was worked out by Robert Boyle in the
mid-1600s. His experiments are still considered examples of good
scientific work and continue to be studied along with their
historical and intellectual contexts by philosophers, historians,
and sociologists. Now there is controversy over whether Boyle s
work was based only on experimental evidence or whether it was
influenced by the politics and religious controversies of the time,
including especially class and gender politics.
Elizabeth Potter argues that even good science is sometimes
influenced by such issues, and she shows that the work leading to
the Gas Law, while certainly based on physical evidence, was also
shaped by class and gendered considerations. At issue were two
descriptions of nature, each supporting radically different visions
of class and gender arrangements. Boyle s Law rested on mechanistic
principles, but Potter shows us an alternative law based on
hylozooic principles (the belief that all matter is animated),
whose adherents challenged social stability and the status quo in
17th-century England."
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!