The United States continues to maintain a large nuclear arsenal
guided by a deterrence strategy little changed since the collapse
of the Warsaw Pact. Notwithstanding changes in the size and
composition of nuclear forces brought about since 1991, the
fundamental rationales and planning principles which informed U.S.
nuclear policy for decades remain in place--despite the
disappearance of a superpower nuclear enemy. In this work, Janne E.
Nolan traces the effort to articulate a post-cold war nuclear
doctrine through decisions taken in the Bush and Clinton
administrations, focusing on the leadership styles of presidents,
bureaucratic politics, and broader foreign policy objectives. Based
on in-depth interviews with policy participants, this study
illuminates in detail the dynamics by which the U.S. government has
tried to reflect the dramatically altered international arena in
its nuclear policies. In two major policy developments--the 1994
Nuclear Posture Review and the decision to sign the African Nuclear
Weapons Free Zone Treaty--U.S. policy makers sought to define the
utility of nuclear weapons after the cold war and to gain
broad-based consensus. For many reasons, these efforts were largely
unsuccessful in developing coherent policies, with the absence of
sustained presidential leadership proving most decisive.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!