Almost half of government employees are represented by labor
organizations, and public-sector unions act as a significant force
in the effective operation of government and can exert substantial
control over labor costs and procedures in the workplace. The
response by state and local officials has varied greatly, with
collective bargaining frameworks existing as a patchwork of
experiments--from mandated collective bargaining to outright
prohibition. While their policy actions seem to recognize the
benefits of bilateral negotiation, the spectre of service
disruption continues to haunt them. Because public-sector
bargaining is a recent development, policy analysts lack a firm
handle on policymaking in this sphere. Piskulich examines the
dimensions of state and local public-sector labor policy and
explores policies that enable policymakers to manage the collective
bargaining process in line with their goals.
This study looks at the three questions most crucial to policy
efficacy: what governments do; why they do it; and what difference
it makes. Three central findings emerge from the issue of what
governments do. The evidence indicates increasing enactment of
labor policy over time across subnational jurisdictions. Policy
across occupations is stable, though there are important
differences in the willingness of the employer to tolerate strikes
and resolve impasses. Third, it appears that policy actors make
three distinct sets of decisions: basic policy; the availability
and mechanics of the arbitration mechanism; and the degree to which
they provide public unions with institutionalized union security.
The answer to why they do it hinges on factors of ideology and
policy; the effects are mitigated when unionization is considered.
What difference it makes, examines two variables in particular:
unionization and service disruption. Piskulich reaches three
conclusions: that a majority of subnational jurisdictions see value
in collective bargaining for their public employees, that unions
can help themselves, and that unionization and disruption vary with
policies implemented. These findings provide insight into the
larger questions on the role of organized labor in American
democracy.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!