In an attempt to explore the explanations why psychiatrists
continue to use electroshock with minors already at risk from
damage, this text investigates reasons why electroshock remains
popular, despite the widespread availability of proven psychosocial
alternatives. The text locates all of the literature since the
1940s about the use of electroshock with minors from three years of
age through adolescence.
Since the introduction of shock with children and teenagers, the
province of psychiatry has been expanded to include minors as young
as three. A fifty-year overview of shock use by psychiatrists with
minors is provided, with an analysis of reasons for its popularity
among some medical staff. The review includes results from a
meta-analysis study that reports data from over 200 previously
published clinical cases. These results indicate that there is no
clinical rationale for the use of shock with children and
teenagers. Moreover, there are many reasons not to give shock,
including ethical, philosophical, moral, and humanistic objections.
The continued use of electroshock by psychiatrists persists only
due to the clinical independence of medical staff. There are no
controlled evaluations, no randomized controlled trials, no
controlled clinical trials, and no single case studies that report
outcome data from electroshock given under scientific conditions to
minors. Rather, the entire published literature is based on
anecdotal reports from uncontrolled interventions. The text
explores the ethical position of mental health staff who are in the
same arena. Alternatives to electroshock are explored in the
context of services for children and teenagers with mental health
needs.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!