|
|
Showing 1 - 6 of
6 matches in All Departments
No two writing situations are exactly the same and skilled writers,
like skilled painters, must develop the know-how to represent the
objects of their writing as part of a flexible art. This special
art of writing lies hidden between grammar--the well-formedness of
sentences--and genre--the capacity of texts to perform culturally
holistic communicative functions (e.g., the memo, the strategic
report, the letter to the editor). Concealed between grammar and
genre, this less visible art of writing is what Kaufer and Butler
call "representational composition." Texts within this hidden art
are best viewed not primarily as grammatical units or as genre
functions, but as bearers of design elements stimulating imagistic,
narrative, and information-rich worlds, and as an invitation to
readers to explore and interact with them.
This volume presents a systematic study of the principles that
underlie writing as representational composition. Drawing from
student models derived from a studio method, the authors use each
chapter to present a different aspect of what unfolds--across the
course of the book--into a cumulative, interactive, and unified
body of representational principles underlying the design of texts.
They reveal what makes the textual representations achieved by
expert writers worthwhile, and, at the same time, difficult for
novice writers to reproduce. Extending the framework of their 1996
volume, "Rhetoric and the Arts" of Design, into a realm of textual
design, this volume will interest students and instructors of
writing, rhetoric, and information design.
In 1888, Mark Twain reflected on the writer's special feel for
words to his correspondent, George Bainton, noting that "the
difference between the almost-right word and the right word is
really a large matter." We recognize differences between a
politician who is "willful" and one who is "willing" even though
the difference does not cross word-stems or parts of speech. We
recognize that being "held up" evokes different experiences
depending upon whether its direct object is a meeting, a bank, or
an example. Although we can notice hundreds of examples in the
language where small differences in wording produce large reader
effects, the authors of "The Power of Words" argue that these
examples are random glimpses of a hidden systematic knowledge that
governs how we, as writers or speakers, learn to shape experience
for other human beings.
Over the past several years, David Kaufer and his colleagues have
developed a software program for analyzing writing called
DocuScope. This book illustrates the concepts and rhetorical theory
behind the software analysis, examining patterns in writing and
showing writers how their writing works in different categories to
accomplish varying objectives. Reflecting the range and variety of
audience experience that contiguous words of surface English can
prime, the authors present a theory of language as an instrument of
rhetorically priming audiences and a catalog of English strings to
implement the theory. The project creates a comprehensive map of
the speaker and writer's implicit knowledge about predisposing
audience experience at the point of utterance.
The book begins with an explanation of why studying language from
the standpoint of priming--not just meaning--is vital to
non-question begging theories of close reading and to language
education in general. The remaining chapters in Part I detail the
steps taken to prepare a catalog study of English strings for their
properties as priming instruments. Part II describes in detail the
catalog of priming categories, including enough examples to help
readers see how individual words and strings of English fit into
the catalog. The final part describes how the authors have applied
the catalog of English strings as priming tools to conduct textual
research.
No two writing situations are exactly the same and skilled writers,
like skilled painters, must develop the know-how to represent the
objects of their writing as part of a flexible art. This special
art of writing lies hidden between grammar--the well-formedness of
sentences--and genre--the capacity of texts to perform culturally
holistic communicative functions (e.g., the memo, the strategic
report, the letter to the editor). Concealed between grammar and
genre, this less visible art of writing is what Kaufer and Butler
call "representational composition." Texts within this hidden art
are best viewed not primarily as grammatical units or as genre
functions, but as bearers of design elements stimulating imagistic,
narrative, and information-rich worlds, and as an invitation to
readers to explore and interact with them.
This volume presents a systematic study of the principles that
underlie writing as representational composition. Drawing from
student models derived from a studio method, the authors use each
chapter to present a different aspect of what unfolds--across the
course of the book--into a cumulative, interactive, and unified
body of representational principles underlying the design of texts.
They reveal what makes the textual representations achieved by
expert writers worthwhile, and, at the same time, difficult for
novice writers to reproduce. Extending the framework of their 1996
volume, "Rhetoric and the Arts" of Design, into a realm of textual
design, this volume will interest students and instructors of
writing, rhetoric, and information design.
The design arts -- from the design of buildings and machines to
software and interfaces -- are associated with types of knowledge
and performance thought to be structured, modular, and systematic.
Such arts have become increasingly prestigious in our technocratic
society. Since Aristotle, the art of rhetoric was conceived as a
loosely structured "practical" art thought to be limited in the
extent to which it could mimic more precise subject matters. The
art of rhetoric has been controversial since classical times, but
its status has sunk even lower since the industrial revolution -- a
point when civic cultures began to cede authority and control to
the cultures of specialized experts. Many sympathizers of rhetoric
have resisted its decline by calling for a civic art of public
discourse to stand in opposition to a technocratic specialized
discourse that has come, increasingly, to disenfranchise the
ordinary citizen.
This is the first book to question the rhetoric/technical
knowledge split from a more fundamental perspective. To get some
perspective on what is at stake in rhetoric's traditional
classification as a "practical" art, the authors:
* explore the distinction between practical and design arts;
* enumerate the various criteria cited in the literature for
qualifying a cluster of knowledge and performative skills to count
as an art of design;
* show how the knowledge and performative skills associated with
the art of rhetoric meet the major requirements of design
knowledge;
* propose a general architecture of rhetorical design, one
descriptive both of civic address and specialized academic
argument;
* turn to the Lincoln/Douglas debates to embody and provide some
empirical support and illustration for their architecture;
* demonstrate how Lincoln and Douglas can be thought of as expert
designers whose rhetoric is highly structured and modular; and
* explain how the rhetoric of both rhetorical agents can be
represented in the layers and modules that one needs to display
plans for buildings, software, or other design artifacts.
These layers and modules are not just post hoc annotations of the
debates; they also illuminate new and systematic ways for viewing
the debates -- and by implication, other specimens of rhetoric --
in terms of strategies of artistic production. Kaufer and Butler
conclude their presentation by citing some of the research and
educational implications that follow from housing rhetoric within
the family of design arts.
The design arts -- from the design of buildings and machines to
software and interfaces -- are associated with types of knowledge
and performance thought to be structured, modular, and systematic.
Such arts have become increasingly prestigious in our technocratic
society. Since Aristotle, the art of rhetoric was conceived as a
loosely structured "practical" art thought to be limited in the
extent to which it could mimic more precise subject matters. The
art of rhetoric has been controversial since classical times, but
its status has sunk even lower since the industrial revolution -- a
point when civic cultures began to cede authority and control to
the cultures of specialized experts. Many sympathizers of rhetoric
have resisted its decline by calling for a civic art of public
discourse to stand in opposition to a technocratic specialized
discourse that has come, increasingly, to disenfranchise the
ordinary citizen.
This is the first book to question the rhetoric/technical
knowledge split from a more fundamental perspective. To get some
perspective on what is at stake in rhetoric's traditional
classification as a "practical" art, the authors:
* explore the distinction between practical and design arts;
* enumerate the various criteria cited in the literature for
qualifying a cluster of knowledge and performative skills to count
as an art of design;
* show how the knowledge and performative skills associated with
the art of rhetoric meet the major requirements of design
knowledge;
* propose a general architecture of rhetorical design, one
descriptive both of civic address and specialized academic
argument;
* turn to the Lincoln/Douglas debates to embody and provide some
empirical support and illustration for their architecture;
* demonstrate how Lincoln and Douglas can be thought of as expert
designers whose rhetoric is highly structured and modular; and
* explain how the rhetoric of both rhetorical agents can be
represented in the layers and modules that one needs to display
plans for buildings, software, or other design artifacts.
These layers and modules are not just post hoc annotations of the
debates; they also illuminate new and systematic ways for viewing
the debates -- and by implication, other specimens of rhetoric --
in terms of strategies of artistic production. Kaufer and Butler
conclude their presentation by citing some of the research and
educational implications that follow from housing rhetoric within
the family of design arts.
In 1888, Mark Twain reflected on the writer's special feel for
words to his correspondent, George Bainton, noting that "the
difference between the almost-right word and the right word is
really a large matter." We recognize differences between a
politician who is "willful" and one who is "willing" even though
the difference does not cross word-stems or parts of speech. We
recognize that being "held up" evokes different experiences
depending upon whether its direct object is a meeting, a bank, or
an example. Although we can notice hundreds of examples in the
language where small differences in wording produce large reader
effects, the authors of The Power of Words argue that these
examples are random glimpses of a hidden systematic knowledge that
governs how we, as writers or speakers, learn to shape experience
for other human beings. Over the past several years, David Kaufer
and his colleagues have developed a software program for analyzing
writing called DocuScope. This book illustrates the concepts and
rhetorical theory behind the software analysis, examining patterns
in writing and showing writers how their writing works in different
categories to accomplish varying objectives. Reflecting the range
and variety of audience experience that contiguous words of surface
English can prime, the authors present a theory of language as an
instrument of rhetorically priming audiences and a catalog of
English strings to implement the theory. The project creates a
comprehensive map of the speaker and writer's implicit knowledge
about predisposing audience experience at the point of utterance.
The book begins with an explanation of why studying language from
the standpoint of priming--not just meaning--is vital to
non-question begging theories of close reading and to language
education in general. The remaining chapters in Part I detail the
steps taken to prepare a catalog study of English strings for their
properties as priming instruments. Part II describes in detail the
catalog of priming categories, including enough examples to help
readers see how individual words and strings of English fit into
the catalog. The final part describes how the authors have applied
the catalog of English strings as priming tools to conduct textual
research.
|
|