|
Showing 1 - 15 of
15 matches in All Departments
There are many connections between human communities and their
surrounding environments that influence community resilience and
health in the Gulf of Mexico. The impacts of the Deepwater Horizon
oil spill on Gulf communities and ecosystems - coupled with the
region's preexisting health challenges and environmental stressors
- illustrate the need to better understand these connections. In
the future, natural and man-made disasters, climate change impacts,
and other environmental stressors will present complex challenges
to the physical, mental, and social well-being of communities in
the Gulf. Understanding the interrelationships among health,
ecological, and economic impacts of disasters and other
environmental stressors will be crucial to addressing these
challenges. Opportunities for the Gulf Research Program: Community
Resilience and Health summarizes a Gulf Research Program workshop
held on September 22-23, 2014, in New Orleans, Louisiana. The
workshop examined opportunities to improve the health, well-being,
and resilience of communities in the Gulf region through
discussions with about 50 participants with diverse expertise and
experience. These discussions identified perceived needs,
challenges, and opportunities that align with the Gulf Research
Program's mission and goals - particularly its goal to improve
understanding of the connections between human health and the
environment to support the development of health and resilient Gulf
communities. This workshop is expected to lead to the development
of additional Program activities and opportunities for the research
community. Table of Contents Front Matter 1 Introduction 2 Human
Health, Public Health Practice, and Community Resilience 3
Perspectives on Resilient Communities 4 Reducing Risk and Improving
Disaster Recovery 5 Building Resilience in the Gulf Region 6
Capacity to Address Environmental Health Risks 7 Long-term
Opportunities 8 Lasting Benefit References A--Workshop Agenda
B--Statement of Task C--Speaker Biographies D--Workshop Attendees
E--Related Funding Programs
Recent scientific and technological advances have accelerated our
understanding of the causes of disease development and progression,
and resulted in innovative treatments and therapies. Ongoing work
to elucidate the effects of individual genetic variation on patient
outcomes suggests the rapid pace of discovery in the biomedical
sciences will only accelerate. However, these advances belie an
important and increasing shortfall between the expansion in therapy
and treatment options and knowledge about how these interventions
might be applied appropriately to individual patients. The
impressive gains made in Americans' health over the past decades
provide only a preview of what might be possible when data on
treatment effects and patient outcomes are systematically captured
and used to evaluate their effectiveness. Needed for progress are
advances as dramatic as those experienced in biomedicine in our
approach to assessing clinical effectiveness. In the emerging era
of tailored treatments and rapidly evolving practice, ensuring the
translation of scientific discovery into improved health outcomes
requires a new approach to clinical evaluation. A paradigm that
supports a continual learning process about what works best for
individual patients will not only take advantage of the rigor of
trials, but also incorporate other methods that might bring
insights relevant to clinical care and endeavor to match the right
method to the question at hand. The Institute of Medicine
Roundtable on Value & Science-Driven Health Care's vision for a
learning healthcare system, in which evidence is applied and
generated as a natural course of care, is premised on the
development of a research capacity that is structured to provide
timely and accurate evidence relevant to the clinical decisions
faced by patients and providers. As part of the Roundtable's
Learning Healthcare System series of workshops, clinical
researchers, academics, and policy makers gathered for the workshop
"Redesigning the Clinical Effectiveness Research Paradigm:
Innovation and Practice-Based Approaches." Participants explored
cutting-edge research designs and methods and discussed strategies
for development of a research paradigm to better accommodate the
diverse array of emerging data resources, study designs, tools, and
techniques. Presentations and discussions are summarized in this
volume.
Fungal diseases have contributed to death and disability in humans,
triggered global wildlife extinctions and population declines,
devastated agricultural crops, and altered forest ecosystem
dynamics. Despite the extensive influence of fungi on health and
economic well-being, the threats posed by emerging fungal pathogens
to life on Earth are often underappreciated and poorly understood.
On December 14 and 15, 2010, the IOM's Forum on Microbial Threats
hosted a public workshop to explore the scientific and policy
dimensions associated with the causes and consequences of emerging
fungal diseases. Table of Contents Front Matter Workshop Overview
Appendix A: Contributed Manuscripts Appendix B: Agenda Appendix C:
Acronyms Appendix D: Glossary Appendix E: Forum Member Biographies
Appendix FSpeaker Biographies
It is essential for patients and clinicians to have the resources
needed to make informed, collaborative care decisions. Despite this
need, only a small fraction of health-related expenditures in the
United States have been devoted to comparative effectiveness
research (CER). To improve the effectiveness and value of the care
delivered, the nation needs to build its capacity for ongoing study
and monitoring of the relative effectiveness of clinical
interventions and care processes through expanded trials and
studies, systematic reviews, innovative research strategies, and
clinical registries, as well as improving its ability to apply what
is learned from such study through the translation and provision of
information and decision support. As part of its Learning Health
System series of workshops, the Institute of Medicine's (IOM's)
Roundtable on Value & Science-Driven Health Care hosted a
workshop to discuss capacity priorities to build the evidence base
necessary for care that is more effective and delivers higher value
for patients. Learning What Works summarizes the proceedings of the
seventh workshop in the Learning Health System series. This
workshop focused on the infrastructure needs-including methods,
coordination capacities, data resources and linkages, and
workforce-for developing an expanded and efficient national
capacity for CER. Learning What Works also assesses the current and
needed capacity to expand and improve this work, and identifies
priority next steps. Learning What Works is a valuable resource for
health care professionals, as well as health care policy makers.
Table of Contents Front Matter Summary 1 The Need and Potential
Returns for Comparative Effectiveness Research 2 The Work Required
3 The Information Networks Required 4 The Talent Required 5
Implementation Priorities 6 Moving Forward Appendix A: Learning
What Works Best: The Nation's Need for Evidence on Comparative
Effectiveness in Health Care Appendix B: Comparative Effectiveness
Studies Inventory Project Appendix C: Comparative Effectiveness
Research Priorities: IOM Recommendations (2009) Appendix D:
Comparative Effectiveness Research Priorities: FCCCER
Recommendations (2009) Appendix E: Affordable Care Act (ACA) (2010)
Provisions for the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
(PCORI) Appendix F: Workshop Agenda Appendix G: Biographical
Sketches of Workshop Participants Appendix H: Workshop Attendee
List Other Publications in The Learning Health System Series
Over the past several decades, new scientific tools and approaches
for detecting microbial species have dramatically enhanced our
appreciation of the diversity and abundance of the microbiota and
its dynamic interactions with the environments within which these
microorganisms reside. The first bacterial genome was sequenced in
1995 and took more than 13 months of work to complete. Today, a
microorganism's entire genome can be sequenced in a few days. Much
as our view of the cosmos was forever altered in the 17th century
with the invention of the telescope, these genomic technologies,
and the observations derived from them, have fundamentally
transformed our appreciation of the microbial world around us. On
June 12 and 13, 2012, the Institute of Medicine's (IOM's) Forum on
Microbial Threats convened a public workshop in Washington, DC, to
discuss the scientific tools and approaches being used for
detecting and characterizing microbial species, and the roles of
microbial genomics and metagenomics to better understand the
culturable and unculturable microbial world around us. Through
invited presentations and discussions, participants examined the
use of microbial genomics to explore the diversity, evolution, and
adaptation of microorganisms in a wide variety of environments; the
molecular mechanisms of disease emergence and epidemiology; and the
ways that genomic technologies are being applied to disease
outbreak trace back and microbial surveillance. Points that were
emphasized by many participants included the need to develop robust
standardized sampling protocols, the importance of having the
appropriate metadata, data analysis and data management challenges,
and information sharing in real time. The Science and Applications
of Microbial Genomics summarizes this workshop. Table of Contents
Front Matter Workshop Overview Appendix A Appendix B--Agenda
Appendix C--Acronyms Appendix D--Glossary Appendix E--Speaker
Biographies
Beginning with the germ theory of disease in the 19th century and
extending through most of the 20th century, microbes were believed
to live their lives as solitary, unicellular, disease-causing
organisms . This perception stemmed from the focus of most
investigators on organisms that could be grown in the laboratory as
cellular monocultures, often dispersed in liquid, and under ambient
conditions of temperature, lighting, and humidity. Most such
inquiries were designed to identify microbial pathogens by
satisfying Koch's postulates.3 This pathogen-centric approach to
the study of microorganisms produced a metaphorical "war" against
these microbial invaders waged with antibiotic therapies, while
simultaneously obscuring the dynamic relationships that exist among
and between host organisms and their associated microorganisms-only
a tiny fraction of which act as pathogens. Despite their obvious
importance, very little is actually known about the processes and
factors that influence the assembly, function, and stability of
microbial communities. Gaining this knowledge will require a
seismic shift away from the study of individual microbes in
isolation to inquiries into the nature of diverse and often complex
microbial communities, the forces that shape them, and their
relationships with other communities and organisms, including their
multicellular hosts. On March 6 and 7, 2012, the Institute of
Medicine's (IOM's) Forum on Microbial Threats hosted a public
workshop to explore the emerging science of the "social biology" of
microbial communities. Workshop presentations and discussions
embraced a wide spectrum of topics, experimental systems, and
theoretical perspectives representative of the current,
multifaceted exploration of the microbial frontier. Participants
discussed ecological, evolutionary, and genetic factors
contributing to the assembly, function, and stability of microbial
communities; how microbial communities adapt and respond to
environmental stimuli; theoretical and experimental approaches to
advance this nascent field; and potential applications of knowledge
gained from the study of microbial communities for the improvement
of human, animal, plant, and ecosystem health and toward a deeper
understanding of microbial diversity and evolution. The Social
Biology of Microbial Communities: Workshop Summary further explains
the happenings of the workshop. Table of Contents Front Matter
Workshop Overview Appendix A: Contributed Manuscripts Appendix B:
Agenda Appendix C: Acronyms Appendix D: Glossary Appendix E:
Speaker Biographies
As past, current, or future patients, the public should be the
health care system's unwavering focus and serve as change agents in
its care. Taking this into account, the quality of health care
should be judged not only by whether clinical decisions are
informed by the best available scientific evidence, but also by
whether care is tailored to a patient's individual needs and
perspectives. However, too often it is provider preference and
convenience, rather than those of the patient, that drive what care
is delivered. As part of its Learning Health System series of
workshops, the Roundtable on Value & Science-Driven Health Care
hosted a workshop to assess the prospects for improving health and
lowering costs by advancing patient involvement in the elements of
a learning health system. Table of Contents Front Matter Synopsis
and Overview 1 The Learning Health System 2 Clinical Research,
Patient Care, and Learning That Is Real-Time and Continuous 3
Clinical Data as a Public Good for Discovery 4 Engaging Patients to
Improve Science and Value in a Learning Health System 5 Health
Information Technology as the Engine for Learning 6 Patients,
Clinical Decisions, and Health Information Management in the
Information Age 7 Applying Evidence for Patient-Centered Care:
Standards and Expectations 8 Team-Based Care and the Learning
Culture 9 Incentives Aligned with Value and Learning 10 Common
Themes and Opportunities for Action Appendixes Appendix A: Workshop
Agenda Appendix B: Biographical Sketches of Workshop Participants
Appendix C: Workshop Attendee List Appendix D: The Learning Health
System Series: Workshop Common Themes OTHER PUBLICATIONS IN THE
LEARNING HEALTH SYSTEM SERIES
Improving our nation's healthcare system is a challenge which,
because of its scale and complexity, requires a creative approach
and input from many different fields of expertise. Lessons from
engineering have the potential to improve both the efficiency and
quality of healthcare delivery. The fundamental notion of a
high-performing healthcare system-one that increasingly is more
effective, more efficient, safer, and higher quality-is rooted in
continuous improvement principles that medicine shares with
engineering. As part of its Learning Health System series of
workshops, the Institute of Medicine's Roundtable on Value and
Science-Driven Health Care and the National Academy of Engineering,
hosted a workshop on lessons from systems and operations
engineering that could be applied to health care. Building on
previous work done in this area the workshop convened leading
engineering practitioners, health professionals, and scholars to
explore how the field might learn from and apply systems
engineering principles in the design of a learning healthcare
system. Engineering a Learning Healthcare System: A Look at the
Future: Workshop Summary focuses on current major healthcare system
challenges and what the field of engineering has to offer in the
redesign of the system toward a learning healthcare system. Table
of Contents Front Matter Summary 1 Engineering a Learning
Healthcare System 2 Engaging Complex Systems Through Engineering
Concepts 3 Healthcare System Complexities, Impediments, and
Failures 4 Case Studies in Transformation Through Systems
Engineering 5 Fostering Systems Change to Drive Continuous Learning
in Health Care 6 Next Steps: Aligning Policies with Leadership
Opportunities Appendixes Appendix A: Workshop Agenda Appendix B:
Biographical Sketches of Workshop Participants Appendix C: Workshop
Attendee List Other Publications in The Learning Health System
Series
Successful development of clinical data as an engine for knowledge
generation has the potential to transform health and health care in
America. As part of its Learning Health System Series, the
Roundtable on Value & Science-Driven Health Care hosted a
workshop to discuss expanding the access to and use of clinical
data as a foundation for care improvement. Table of Contents Front
Matter Summary 1 Clinical Data as the Basic Staple of the Learning
Health System 2 U.S. Healthcare Data Today: Current State of Play 3
Changing the Terms: Data System Transformation in Progress 4
Healthcare Data: Public Good or Private Property? 5 Healthcare Data
as a Public Good: Privacy and Security 6 Creating a Next-Generation
Data Utility: Building Blocks and the Action Agenda 7 Engaging the
Public 8 Clinical Data as the Basic Staple of Health Learning:
Ideas for Action Appendixes Appendix A: Workshop Agenda Appendix B:
Biographical Sketches of Workshop Participants Appendix C: Workshop
Attendee List Appendix D: The IOM Committee on Health Research and
the Privacy of Health Information: The HIPAA Privacy Rule Other
Publications in the Learning Healthcare System Series
|
Value in Health Care - Accounting for Cost, Quality, Safety, Outcomes, and Innovation: Workshop Summary (Paperback)
Pierre L. Young, LeighAnne Olsen, J. Michael McGinnis, Roundtable on Evidence-Based Medicine, Roundtable on Value & Science-Driven Health Care, …
|
R1,563
Discovery Miles 15 630
|
Ships in 12 - 17 working days
|
The United States has the highest per capita spending on health
care of any industrialized nation. Yet despite the unprecedented
levels of spending, harmful medical errors abound, uncoordinated
care continues to frustrate patients and providers, and U.S.
healthcare costs continue to increase. The growing ranks of the
uninsured, an aging population with a higher prevalence of chronic
diseases, and many patients with multiple conditions together
constitute more complicating factors in the trend to higher costs
of care. A variety of strategies are beginning to be employed
throughout the health system to address the central issue of value,
with the goal of improving the net ratio of benefits obtained per
dollar spent on health care. However, despite the obvious need, no
single agreed-upon measure of value or comprehensive, coordinated
systemwide approach to assess and improve the value of health care
exists. Without this definition and approach, the path to achieving
greater value will be characterized by encumbrance rather than
progress. To address the issues central to defining, measuring, and
improving value in health care, the Institute of Medicine convened
a workshop to assemble prominent authorities on healthcare value
and leaders of the patient, payer, provider, employer,
manufacturer, government, health policy, economics, technology
assessment, informatics, health services research, and health
professions communities. The workshop, summarized in this volume,
facilitated a discussion of stakeholder perspectives on measuring
and improving value in health care, identifying the key barriers
and outlining the opportunities for next steps.
This volume reports on discussions among multiple stakeholders
about ways they might help transform health care in the United
States. The U.S. healthcare system consists of a complex network of
decentralized and loosely associated organizations, services,
relationships, and participants. Each of the healthcare system's
component sectors--patients, healthcare professionals, healthcare
delivery organizations, healthcare product developers, clinical
investigators and evaluators, regulators, insurers, employers and
employees, and individuals involved in information
technology--conducts activities that support a common goal: to
improve patient health and wellbeing. Implicit in this goal is the
commitment of each stakeholder group to contribute to the evidence
base for health care, that is, to assist with the development and
application of information about the efficacy, safety,
effectiveness, value, and appropriateness of the health care
delivered.
Individually and collectively, resident microbes play important
roles in host health and survival. Shaping and shaped by their host
environments, these microorganisms form intricate communities that
are in a state of dynamic equilibrium. This ecologic and dynamic
view of host-microbe interactions is rapidly redefining our view of
health and disease. It is now accepted that the vast majority of
microbes are, for the most part, not intrinsically harmful, but
rather become established as persistent, co-adapted colonists in
equilibrium with their environment, providing useful goods and
services to their hosts while deriving benefits from these host
associations. Disruption of such alliances may have consequences
for host health, and investigations in a wide variety of organisms
have begun to illuminate the complex and dynamic network of
interaction - across the spectrum of hosts, microbes, and
environmental niches - that influence the formation, function, and
stability of host-associated microbial communities. Microbial
Ecology in States of Health and Disease is the summary of a
workshop convened by the Institute of Medicine's Forum on Microbial
Threats in March 2013 to explore the scientific and therapeutic
implications of microbial ecology in states of health and disease.
Participants explored host-microbe interactions in humans, animals,
and plants; emerging insights into how microbes may influence the
development and maintenance of states of health and disease; the
effects of environmental change(s) on the formation, function, and
stability of microbial communities; and research challenges and
opportunities for this emerging field of inquiry. Table of Contents
Front Matter Workshop Overview A1 Effector and memory T cell
responses to commensal bacteria--Yasmine Belkaid, Nicolas
Bouladoux, and Timothy W. Hand A2 What are the consequences of the
disappearing human microbiota?--Martin J. Blaser and Stanley Falkow
A3 Pathways in microbe-induced obesity--Laura M. Cox and Martin J.
Blaser A4 Microbial exposure during early life has persistent
effects on natural killer T Cell function--Torsten Olszak, Dingding
An, Sebastian Zeissig, Miguel Penilla Vera, Julia Richter, Andre
Franke, Jonathan N. Glickman, Reiner Siebert, Rebecca M. Barron,
Dennis L. Kasper, and Richard S. Blumberg A5 The application of
ecological theory toward an understanding of the human
microbiome--Elizabeth K. Costello, Keaton Stagaman, Les Dethlefsen,
Brendan J. M. Bohannan, and David A. Relman A6 Seasonal
restructuring of the ground squirrel gutmicrobiota over the annual
hibernation cycle--Hannah V. Carey, William A. Walters, and Rob
Knight A7 Lessons from studying insect symbioses--Angela E. Douglas
A8 A new vision of immunity: homeostasis of the
superorganism--Grard Eberl A9 Host defense and immunomodulation of
mucosal candidiasis--Paul L. Fidel, Jr., and Mairi C. Noverr A10
Microbiota-targeted therapies: An ecological perspective--Katherine
P. Lemon, Gary C. Armitage, David A. Relman, and Michael Fischbach
A11 Community ecology and the vaginal microbiome--Larry J. Forney
and Jacques Ravel A12 Investigating bacterial-animal symbioses with
light sheet microscopy--Michael J. Taormina, Matthew Jemielita, W.
Zac Stephens, Adam R. Burns, Joshua V. Troll, Raghuveer
Parthasarathy, and Karen Guillemin A13 Clinical application of
fecal microbiota transplantation in Clostridium difficile infection
and beyond--Josbert J. Keller and Els van Nood A14 Consumption of
human milk glycoconjugates by infant-associated bifidobacteria:
Mechanisms and implications--Daniel Garrido, David C. Dallas, and
David A. Mills A15 Bacteriophage adhering to mucus providea
nonhost-derived immunity--Jeremy J. Barr, Rita Auro, Mike Furlan,
Katrine L. Whiteson, Marcella L. Erb, Joe Pogliano, Aleksandr
Stotland, Roland Wolkowicz, Andrew S. Cutting, Kelly S. Doran,
Peter Salamon, Merry Youle, and Forest Rohwer A16 Topographic
diversity of fungal and bacterial communities in human skin--Keisha
Findley, Julia Oh, Joy Yang, Sean Conlan, Clayton Deming, Jennifer
A. Meyer, Deborah Schoenfeld, Effie Nomicos, Morgan Park, NIH
Intramural Sequencing Center Comparative Sequencing Program, Heidi
H. Kong, and Julia A. Segre A17 Distinct microbial communities
within the endosphere and rhizosphere of Populus deltoides roots
across contrasting soil types--Neil R. Gottel, Hector F. Castro,
Marilyn Kerley, Zamin Yang, Dale A. Pelletier, Mircea Podar,
Tatiana Karpinets, Ed Uberbacher, Gerald A. Tuskan, Rytas Vilgalys,
Mitchel J. Doktycz, and Christopher W. Schadt A18 Interactions
between commensal fungi and the C-type lectin receptor Dectin-1
influence colitis--Iliyan D. Iliev, Vincent A. Funari, Kent D.
Taylor, Quoclinh Nguyen, Christopher N. Reyes, Samuel P. Strom,
Jordan Brown, Courtney A. Becker, Phillip R. Fleshner, Marla
Dubinsky, Jerome I. Rotter, Hanlin L. Wang, Dermot P. B. McGovern,
Gordon D. Brown, and David M. Underhill A19 Metagenomics and
personalized medicine--Herbert W. Virgin and John A. Todd A20 From
genetics of inflammatory bowel disease towards mechanistic
insights--Daniel B. Graham and Ramnik J. Xavier A21 Antimicrobial
peptides and the microbiome--Michael Zasloff Appendix B: Agenda
Appendix C: Acronyms Appendix D: Glossary Appendix E: Speaker
Biographies
Globalization of the food supply has created conditions favorable
for the emergence, reemergence, and spread of food-borne
pathogens-compounding the challenge of anticipating, detecting, and
effectively responding to food-borne threats to health. In the
United States, food-borne agents affect 1 out of 6 individuals and
cause approximately 48 million illnesses, 128,000 hospitalizations,
and 3,000 deaths each year. This figure likely represents just the
tip of the iceberg, because it fails to account for the broad array
of food-borne illnesses or for their wide-ranging repercussions for
consumers, government, and the food industry-both domestically and
internationally. A One Health approach to food safety may hold the
promise of harnessing and integrating the expertise and resources
from across the spectrum of multiple health domains including the
human and veterinary medical and plant pathology communities with
those of the wildlife and aquatic health and ecology communities.
The IOM's Forum on Microbial Threats hosted a public workshop on
December 13 and 14, 2011 that examined issues critical to the
protection of the nation's food supply. The workshop explored
existing knowledge and unanswered questions on the nature and
extent of food-borne threats to health. Participants discussed the
globalization of the U.S. food supply and the burden of illness
associated with foodborne threats to health; considered the
spectrum of food-borne threats as well as illustrative case
studies; reviewed existing research, policies, and practices to
prevent and mitigate foodborne threats; and, identified
opportunities to reduce future threats to the nation's food supply
through the use of a "One Health" approach to food safety.
Improving Food Safety Through a One Health Approach: Workshop
Summary covers the events of the workshop and explains the
recommendations for future related workshops. Table of Contents
Front Matter Workshop Overview Appendix A: Contributed Manuscripts
Appendix B: Agenda Appendix C: Acronyms Appendix D: Glossary
Appendix E: Speaker Biographies
The United States has the highest per capita spending on health
care of any industrialized nation but continually lags behind other
nations in health care outcomes including life expectancy and
infant mortality. National health expenditures are projected to
exceed $2.5 trillion in 2009. Given healthcare's direct impact on
the economy, there is a critical need to control health care
spending. According to The Health Imperative: Lowering Costs and
Improving Outcomes, the costs of health care have strained the
federal budget, and negatively affected state governments, the
private sector and individuals. Healthcare expenditures have
restricted the ability of state and local governments to fund other
priorities and have contributed to slowing growth in wages and jobs
in the private sector. Moreover, the number of uninsured has risen
from 45.7 million in 2007 to 46.3 million in 2008. The Health
Imperative: Lowering Costs and Improving Outcomes identifies a
number of factors driving expenditure growth including scientific
uncertainty, perverse economic and practice incentives, system
fragmentation, lack of patient involvement, and under-investment in
population health. Experts discussed key levers for catalyzing
transformation of the delivery system. A few included streamlined
health insurance regulation, administrative simplification and
clarification and quality and consistency in treatment. The book is
an excellent guide for policymakers at all levels of government, as
well as private sector healthcare workers.
As our nation enters a new era of medical science that offers the
real prospect of personalized health care, we will be confronted by
an increasingly complex array of health care options and decisions.
The Learning Healthcare System considers how health care is
structured to develop and to apply evidence-from health profession
training and infrastructure development to advances in research
methodology, patient engagement, payment schemes, and
measurement-and highlights opportunities for the creation of a
sustainable learning health care system that gets the right care to
people when they need it and then captures the results for
improvement. This book will be of primary interest to hospital and
insurance industry administrators, health care providers, those who
train and educate health workers, researchers, and policymakers.
The Learning Healthcare System is the first in a series that will
focus on issues important to improving the development and
application of evidence in health care decision making. The
Roundtable on Evidence-Based Medicine serves as a neutral venue for
cooperative work among key stakeholders on several dimensions: to
help transform the availability and use of the best evidence for
the collaborative health care choices of each patient and provider;
to drive the process of discovery as a natural outgrowth of patient
care; and, ultimately, to ensure innovation, quality, safety, and
value in health care. Table of Contents Front Matter Summary 1
Hints of a Different Way-Case Studies in Practice-Based Evidence 2
The Evolving Evidence Base-Methodologic and Policy Challenges 3
Narrowing the Research-Practice Divide-Systems Considerations 4 New
Approaches-Learning Systems in Progress 5 Developing the Test Bed:
Linking Integrated Service Delivery Systems 6 The Patient as a
Catalyst for Change 7 Training the Learning Health Professional 8
Structuring the Incentives for Change Appendix A Workshop Agenda
Appendix B Biographical Sketches of Participants Appendix C
Workshop Attendee List Appendix D IOM Roundtable on Evidence-Based
Medicine
|
You may like...
Loot
Nadine Gordimer
Paperback
(2)
R398
R330
Discovery Miles 3 300
Loot
Nadine Gordimer
Paperback
(2)
R398
R330
Discovery Miles 3 300
Loot
Nadine Gordimer
Paperback
(2)
R398
R330
Discovery Miles 3 300
Poor Things
Emma Stone, Mark Ruffalo, …
DVD
R449
R329
Discovery Miles 3 290
|