|
|
Books > Law > Laws of other jurisdictions & general law > Courts & procedure > Arbitration procedure
The book systematically describes the theory and practice of ICSID
annulment proceedings by thoroughly analyzing this mechanism in
light of the annulment decisions rendered so far as well as the
publications on the issue.
Organized to suit the needs of the practitioner, it outlines the
recent trends in the area, providing the most up to date analysis
of the subject. It also addresses key topics involving ICSID
annulment such as the procedural issues which frequently arise in
this type of proceedings, for example admissability of new evidence
and arguments in annulment proceedings, res judicata in resubmitted
cases.
The sections on each ground for annulment include an analysis of
the applicable standard as well as a detailed description and study
of each annulment decision that addressed the respective ground,
creating an authoritative and complete resource.
What does an athlete do when she is not allowed to take the start
of the Olympic finals because of a positive doping test or he is
not allowed to compete at the Games for reasons of nationality? He
or she brings the case before the ad hoc Division of the Court of
Arbitration for Sport, an arbitral body first created on the
occasion of the 1996 Games in Atlanta, which is present on site and
resolves all disputes within 24 hours. Written by its former
President, who teaches and practices international dispute
resolution in Geneva, Switzerland, this book tells the story of the
ad hoc Division from Atlanta to Sydney over Nagano. It gives an
account of the cases resolved, discusses the Arbitration Rules, and
explains the practical operation of the Division. It also reviews
all the main arbitration law issues which the Division faces,
including jurisdiction, arbitrability, due process, the choice and
proof of the applicable substantive rules, the remedies against the
award, as well as some sports law issues, such as field of play
rules or strict liability for doping offenses.
This book analyzes how today's system of international trade law
and international economic relations has evolved over the last six
decades. Focusing on the major innovations that came with the
inception of the World Trade Organization (WTO) with its various
agreements in 1994, it also provides in-depth commentary on the
intense debate over important matters that remain unsettled. Topics
covered include the WTO dispute settlement mechanism; the General
Agreement on Trade in Services (OATS); the Agreement on
Trade-Related Investment Measures (TRIMS); intellectual property
rights - the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual
Property Rights (TRIPS); areas still covered by the General
Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1947; the Most Favoured
Nation (MFN) concept; special provisions relating to agriculture
and textiles; sanitary and phytosanitary measures; technical
barriers to trade; pre-shipment inspection; and import licensing
procedures. The book would be an excellent resource for scholars as
well as practitioners working in the field of international
arbitration and trade laws.
This book explores the transnational legal infrastructure for
dispute resolution in transnational securities transactions. It
discusses the role of law and dispute resolution in securities
transactions, the types of disputes arising from them, and the
institutional and legal aspects of dispute resolution, both
generally and regarding aggregate litigation. It illustrates
different dispute resolution systems and aggregate litigation
methods, and examines the legal issues of dispute resolution
arising from transnational securities transactions. In addition,
the book proposes two systems of dispute resolution for
transnational securities transactions depending on the type of
dispute: collective redress through arbitration and a network of
alternative dispute resolution systems.
This book addresses current developments concerning the
interpretation of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the
Sea (UNCLOS) on the part of international courts and tribunals. It
does so from different perspectives, by focusing on the
jurisprudence of international and regional bodies, such as the
International Court of Justice (ICJ), the International Tribunal
for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS), the European Court of Justice (ECJ)
and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), as well as
international arbitral tribunals and the World Trade Organization
(WTO) Dispute Settlement Body. The various contributions offer
in-depth analyses of issues ranging from the interaction between
the sources of the International Law of the Sea, to various
substantial, procedural and institutional aspects of the regulatory
framework established by UNCLOS. The book also focuses on the
reference by international courts and tribunals, in Law of the Sea
cases, to both general principles and rules concerning
interpretation codified in the Vienna Conventions on the Law of
Treaties.
Friendship is one of our most important social institutions. It is
the not only the salve for personal loneliness and isolation; it is
the glue that binds society together. Yet for a host of
reasons--longer hours at work, the Internet, suburban sprawl--many
have argued that friendship is on the decline in contemporary
America. In social surveys, researchers have found that Americans
on average have fewer friends today than in times past.
In Friend v. Friend, Ethan J. Leib takes stock of this most ancient
of social institutions and its ongoing transformations, and
contends that it could benefit from better and more sensitive
public policies. Leib shows that the law has not kept up with
changes in our society: it sanctifies traditional family structures
but has no thoughtful approach to other aspects of our private
lives. Leib contrasts our excessive legal sensitivity to marriage
and families with the lack of legal attention to friendship, and
shows why more legal attention to friendship could actually improve
our public institutions and our civil society. He offers a number
of practical proposals that can support new patterns of
interpersonal affinity without making friendship an onerous legal
burden.
An elegantly written and highly original account of the changing
nature of friendship, Friend v. Friend upends the conventional
wisdom that law and friendship are inimical, and shows how we can
strengthen both by seeing them as mutually reinforcing.
This book provides an insight into commercial relations between
large economies and Small States, the benefits of regional
integration, the role of Small States as financial centres as well
as B2B and State to State dispute resolution involving Small
States. Several contributions allow the reader to familiarise
themselves with the general subject matter; others scrutinise the
particular issues Small States face when confronted with an
international dispute and discuss new and innovative solutions.
These solutions range from inventive ideas to help economic growth
to appropriate mechanisms of dispute resolution including
inter-State dispute resolution and specific areas of arbitration
such as tax arbitration. Researchers, policy advisors and
practitioners will find a wealth of insights, information and
practical ideas in this book.
This book analyses the contractual mechanisms requiring parties to
exhaust a selected amicable dispute resolution procedure before
proceedings in court or arbitration are initiated. It briefly
explains the phenomenon of integrated dispute resolution, outlines
ADR methods commonly used in multi-tiered clauses and presents the
overview of standard clauses published by various ADR providers and
professional bodies. The core of the analysis is devoted to the
enforceability of multi-tiered clauses under the legal systems of
England and Wales, Germany, France and Switzerland. It is essential
reading for practitioners and academics working in this area.
With a foreword by Prof. Paolo Palchetti The topic of this book is
the participation of the EU in international dispute settlement. It
aims to provide the reader with an appraisal of the most
problematic aspects connected with the participation of a sui
generis legal subject such as the EU to international dispute
settlement mechanisms in a State-centric international law. In
particular, the publication dwells on the question of how to make
possible an effective participation in disputes while at the same
time preserving the specific characteristics (i.e. the autonomy) of
the EU legal order. It does so by outlining different models and
proposing the internalization model adopted under EU investment
agreements as a possible paradigm. It is aimed at academics,
practitioners and graduate students as well as EU officials and
judges who should find the issues discussed both useful and of
interest for staying up-to-date on the scholarly discussion and of
their relevance to case law. Luca Pantaleo is a Lecturer in
International and European Law at The Hague University of Applied
Sciences in The Netherlands. He obtained a PhD in International and
EU Law in 2013 at the University of Macerata in Italy and was
previously a Senior Researcher at the T.M.C. Asser Institute and
Postdoctoral researcher at the University of Luxembourg. Specific
to this book: * Provides an up-to-date analysis of a current
problem* The topic of the book is located at the intersection
between international and EU law* Fills an important gap in the
available literature
This book provides theoretical and practical insights for effective
decision making in situations that involve various types of
conflict cleavages. Embedding historical analysis, negotiation
analysis, political scientific analysis and game theoretical
analysis in an integrated analytical framework allows a
comprehensive perspective on various dilemmas and self-enforcing
dynamics that inhibit decision making. The conceptualization of
strategic facilitation highlights the value of leadership,
chairmanship and the role of threshold states in facilitating
decision making as the global climate change negotiations unfolds.
Contrasting arbitration of securities disputes with litigation
in the courts, this book reviews the interaction of federal
securities laws and arbitration in light of caselaw. This review
culminates in the recent U.S. Supreme Court cases supporting the
validity of predisputed arbitration agreements even when there are
claims of fraud and violations of federal securities law. The
common law view of arbitration and the Federal Arbitration Act of
1925 are discussed, as are the arbitration process and forums
within the securities industry. Procedures (e.g. evaluating the
merits of a claim, presenting a securities case to arbitration
panels throughout the nation, and appealing an arbitration award)
are also examined. It is the only book to date to discuss the new
AAA Securities Arbitration Rules.
Ideal for lawyers and securities industry professionals, the
book discusses the theories for brokerage firm liability such as
securities fraud, churning, the Know Your Customer rule,
suitability, problems with trades (e.g. failure of execution or
orders), and improper record keeping. It also discusses the use of
arbitration to resolve disputes between those working in the
industry and reviews the requirements for statements of claims in
an arbitration process. Methods of evaluation, statutes, and forms
are provided, which will be helpful to both the individual and the
lawyer contemplating prosecuting a securities claim in arbitration
versus litigation.
|
|