|
|
Books > Humanities > Religion & beliefs > Christianity > Protestantism & Protestant Churches > Calvinist, Reformed & Presbyterian Churches
The seventeenth century Reformed Orthodox discussions of the work
of Christ and its various doctrinal constitutive elements were rich
and multifaceted, ranging across biblical and exegetical,
historical, philosophical, and theological fields of inquiry. Among
the most contested questions in these discussions was the question
of the necessity of Christ's satisfaction. This study sets that
"great controverted point," as Richard Baxter called it, in its
historical and traditionary contexts and provides a philosophical
and theological analysis of the arguments offered by two
representative Reformed scholastic theologians, William Twisse and
John Owen.
In this volume, leading systematic theologians and New Testament
scholars working today undertake a fresh and constructive
interdisciplinary engagement with key eschatological themes in
Christian theology in close conversation with the work of Karl
Barth. Ranging from close exegetical studies of Barth's treatment
of eschatological themes in his commentary on Romans or lectures on
1 Corinthians, to examination of his mature dogmatic discussions of
death and evil, this volume offers a fascinating variety of
insights into both Barth's theology and its legacy, as well as the
eschatological dimensions of the biblical witness and its salience
for both the academy and church. Contributors are: John M. G.
Barclay, Douglas Campbell, Christophe Chalamet, Kaitlyn Dugan,
Nancy J. Duff, Susan Eastman, Beverly Roberts Gaventa, Grant
Macaskill, Kenneth Oakes, Christoph Schwoebel Christiane Tietz,
Philip G. Ziegler.
In the second volume of her Essays in Ecumenical Theology, Ivana
Noble engages in conversation with Orthodox theologians and
spiritual writers on diverse questions, such as how to discover the
human heart, what illumination by the divine light means, how
spiritual life is connected to attitudes and acts of social
solidarity, why sacrificial thinking may not be the best frame for
expressing Christ's redemption, why theological anthropology needs
to have a strong ecological dimension, why freedom needs to coexist
with love for others, and why institutions find the ability to be
helpful not only in their own traditions but also in the Spirit
that blows where it wills.
|
|