Strategic legal presentation of commercial real estate rental law from the landlord s perspective, including all the tricks and tips. Thorough but free of any extra verbiage, easily understandable through checklists, sample formulations, general instructions, and sample contracts."

A systematic presentation of the general law of irregularity in performance.

In The Law of Evidence in Victorian England, which was originally published in 1997, Christopher Allen provides a fascinating account of the political, social and intellectual influences on the development of evidence law during the Victorian period. His book sets out to challenge the traditional view of the significance of Jeremy Bentham's critique of the state of contemporary evidence law, and shows how statutory reforms were achieved for reasons that had little to do with Bentham's radical programme, and how evidence law was developed by common law judges in a way diametrically opposed to that advocated by Bentham. Dr Allen's meticulous account provides a wealth of detail into the functioning of courts in Victorian England, and will appeal to everyone interested in the English legal system during this period.

Volume 2 of Japan and German Civil Procedural Law, a collection of essays on civil procedural law, includes additional essays that were published after the release of the first volume.

Das Praktikerbuch vermittelt sehr anschaulich und ubersichtlich die Grundlagen des Architektenrechts. Es wendet sich gleichermassen an Architekten, Bauherren und Juristen. Die Konsequenzen aus der Schuldrechtsmodernisierung und die aktuellen Entwicklungen der HOAI sind bereits umfassend miteingearbeitet. Im ersten Teil des Buches werden die wesentlichen Grundzuge des Architektenvertragsrechts vorgestellt, und dem Leser wird eine Vertragscheckliste mit Beispielen an die Hand gegeben. Der zweite Teil behandelt die Grundzuge des Honorarrechts, von der Honorarberechnung bis hin zu problematischen Sonderfragen. Im dritten Teil geht der Autor auf Fragen des Haftungsrechts ein. Dabei werden besondere Risikofallgruppen erortert."

The essays published in this collection introduce the reader to Japanese civil procedural law and contribute to comparative law.

Collaborative practice is a new method of dispute resolution, used mainly in family law matters. By taking a non-adversarial approach, it challenges the strictly positivist view of the lawyer as 'zealous advocate' for the client. As such, it has received much criticism from the established Bar and legal profession. This book provides a doctrinal and empirical analysis of collaborative practice with a view to assessing its place within the dispute resolution continuum and addressing whether this criticism has been justified. It begins by establishing the theoretical underpinnings of conflict and differing approaches to conflict resolution, the impact of the comprehensive law movement and therapeutic jurisprudence. The origins and development of the collaborative process and the framework it provides for a multidisciplinary approach to conflict resolution is outlined. The book addresses the examination of the process undertaken in the lead up to the enactment of the Uniform Collaborative Law Act in 2010; now regarded as a model of best practice. Finally, through an examination of empirical research undertaken in the US, Canada and in England and Wales, and in presenting the results of the first known empirical research into the process in an Irish family law context, the book concludes with an evidenced based analysis of the process from the perspective of couples who chose to use the collaborative model to resolve the issues surrounding their relationship breakdown, collaborative lawyers and lawyers who do not advocate a non-adversarial approach. As such this book provides a valuable insight into the process which will be of interest to: academics; practising lawyers; members of the judiciary; researchers in the fields of conflict resolution and family law and for students studying alternative dispute resolution (ADR).

This book examines systematically the underlying theory of evidence in Anglo-American legal systems and identifies the defining characteristics of adjudicative fact-finding. Stein develops a detailed innovative theory which sets aside the traditional vision of evidence law as facilitating the discovery of the truth. Combining probability theory, epistemology, economic analysis, and moral philosophy; he argues instead that the fundamental purpose of evidence law is to apportion the risk of error in conditions of uncertainty. Stein begins by identifying the domain of evidence law.He then describes the basic traits of adjudicative fact-finding and explores the epistemological foundations of the concept. This discussion identifies the problem of probabilistic deduction that accompanies generalizations to which fact-finders resort. This problem engenders paradoxes which Stein proposes to resolve by distinguishing between probability and weight. Stein advances the principle of maximal individualization that does not allow factfinders to make a finding against a person when the evidence they use is not susceptible to individualized testing.He argues that this principle has broad application, but may still be overridden by social utility. This analysis identifies allocation of the risk of error as requiring regulation by evidence law. Advocating a principled allocation of the risk of error, Stein denounces free proof for allowing individual judges to apportion this risk as they deem fit.He criticizes the UK's recent shift to a discretionary regime on similar grounds. Stein develops three fundamental principles for allocating the risk of error: the cost-efficiency principle which applies across the board; the equality principle which applies in civil litigation; and the equal best principle which applies in criminal trials. The cost-efficiency principle demands that fact-finders minimize the total cost of errors and error-avoidance.Under the equality principle, fact-finding procedures and decisions must not produce an unequal apportionment of the risk of error between the claimant and the defendant. This risk should be apportioned equally between the parties. The equal best principle sets forth two conditions for justifiably convicting and punishing a defendant. The state must do its best to protect the defendant from the risk of erroneous conviction and must not provide better protection to other individuals. Regulating both the admissibility of evidence and its sufficiency, these principles explain and justify many existing evidentiary rules. Alex Stein is Professor of Law at the Benjamin N.Cardozo School of Law,New York.

Das Werk behandelt die Sache, den Besitz und die Rechte an beweglichen Sachen. Als systematisches Handbuch wendet er sich an Praktiker, Studenten und Wissenschaftler. Es werden zunachst die Grundlagen der behandelten Rechtsgebiete herausgearbeitet; besonders die Geschichte der Institutionen und Dogmen. Damit wird nicht nur die Kontinuitat des Rechtes aufgezeigt, sondern auch das Verstandnis des heutigen Rechtsstandes erleichtert. Angesichts der umfassenden Behandlung des Sachenrechts bietet dieser Band allen praktizierenden Juristen und Studenten ein profundes Nachschlagewerk fur ihre Praxis und gehort deshalb in jede Anwaltskanzlei."

Mit dieser Festschrift wird ein Gelehrter geehrt, dessen uberragendes juristisches Fachwissen sich immer mit einer weitgespannten Allgemeinbildung, insbesondere auf den Gebieten der Kunst, der Musik, der Literatur und vor allem auch der Theologie, verbunden hat. Zu seinem 70. Geburtstag am 19. September 2009 uberreichen Freunde, Kollegen und Wegbegleiter Achim Kramer damit einen spatsommerlichen Strauss unterschiedlicher fachlicher und literarischer Provenienz

Now in its fourth edition, the Wieczorek/Schutze legal commentary is a virtual institution in the field of civil procedure. This fourteen-volume guide once again sets the standard for legal reference works. Based on solid legal scholarship, it comprehensively considers practical requirements and needs in relation to civil procedure. The authorial team, which is composed of 33 legal scholars and practitioners - including several new younger members - ensures that the commentary remains true to its rich traditions, but at the same time is up-to-date for current and future needs. In addition to German civil procedure, the commentary addresses relevant supplementary laws in Germany (e.g. EGZPO, GVG, KapMuG, and MediationsG), as well as European and international civil procedure. The commentary also takes into consideration relevant legal changes as well as the newest developments in case law and legal teaching. Here you find an overview of all fourteen volumes. Take a closer look at the extract of volume 12 1067-1109; Internationales Zivilprozessrecht; Rechtsquellen und Materialien.

Maximize your bankruptcy filing benefits. If you have to file a personal bankruptcy case, you can find the accessible, authoritative guidance you'll need to do it right in order to get the fresh start you deserve. One of America's top bankruptcy lawyers, Henry J. Sommer, clearly and carefully takes you through the process of filing under chapter 7 and chapter 13.helps you determine which course is better.alerts you to the legal protections you enjoy under the sweeping Bankruptcy Code.assists you in getting the right legal counsel.and helps remove concern about the stigma associated with bankruptcy. This plain-English version of Sommer's definitive manual, Consumer Bankruptcy Law and Practice, provides you with a lucid overview of how bankruptcy works, then helps you:
* Determine if bankruptcy is finally the best path for you to take
* Select an alternative means of financial restoration if it is not
* Understand the myriad forms involved when filing
* Prepare for the sometimes complex proceedings once the paperwork is done
* Effectively use such ""shields"" as automatic stays and exemption provisions
* Capitalize on the many advantages of using bankruptcy court as a forum
* Work more wisely with your attorney--and much, much more
Along the way, Consumer Bankruptcy dispels many of the tired myths surrounding bankruptcy, highlights many of its hidden advantages, assists you in devising a workable fee arrangement with your lawyer, and even alerts you to the rights you have as a creditor if you choose to make a claim against a business in bankruptcy.

The words of the U.S. Constitution limit the possibilities of political action: they bind us in certain ways. How they bind us, however, depends upon how these words are interpreted and upon the distinctively American practice of judicial review.In "Words That Bind, " John Arthur examines conflicting theories of constitutional interpretation and judicial review, arguing that each of the dominant legal approaches--from original intent to law and economics, from legal pragmatism to critical legal studies--rests on a distinct philosophical conception of democracy.Turning to recent work in political philosophy, Arthur explores the important but oft-ignored implications of both utilitarianism and social contract theory for constitutional interpretation and judicial review. He addresses such important and contested issues as the justification of rights, the rule of law, popular consent, equality, and feminist constitutional theory. The book makes an especially significant contribution through the fruitful interaction of two traditions: constitutional jurisprudence and contemporary political theory."Words That Bind" presents a careful and nuanced treatment of a set of ideas and institutional forms absolutely central to U.S. democracy. Arguing that neither legal theory nor political philosophy can proceed independently of the other, Arthur illuminates both topics as no other recent author has.

For most people in rural South Africa, traditional justice mechanisms provide the only feasible means of accessing any form of justice. These mechanisms are popularly associated with restorative justice, reconciliation and harmony in rural communities. Yet, this ethnographic study grounded in the political economy of rural South Africa reveals how historical conditions and contemporary pressures have strained these mechanisms' ability to deliver the high normative ideals with which they are notionally linked. In places such as Msinga access to justice is made especially precarious by the reality that human insecurity - a composite of physical, social and material insecurity - is high for both ordinary people and the authorities who staff local justice forums; cooperation is low between traditional justice mechanisms and the criminal and social justice mechanisms the state is meant to provide; and competition from purportedly more effective 'twilight institutions', like vigilante associations, is rife. Further contradictions are presented by profoundly gendered social relations premised on delicate social trust that is closely monitored by one's community and enforced through self-help measures like witchcraft accusations in a context in which violence is, culturally and practically, a highly plausible strategy for dispute management. These contextual considerations compel us to ask what justice we can reasonably speak of access to in such an insecure context and what solutions are viable under such volatile human conditions? The book concludes with a vision for access to justice in rural South Africa that takes seriously ordinary people's circumstances and traditional authorities' lived experiences as documented in this detailed study. The author proposes a cooperative governance model that would maximise the resources and capacity of both traditional and state justice apparatus for delivering the legal and social justice - namely, peace and protection from violence as well as mitigation of poverty and destitution - that rural people genuinely need.

In this timely volume, the authors provide a penetrating analysis of the institutional mechanisms perpetuating the related problems of minorities' disenfranchisement and their underrepresentation on juries.

The revision of the introduction to inheritance law offers among other things up-to-date information on the forthcoming legislative reform of the inheritance law, the law of limitation of claims, decisions from the constitutional court on testamentary freedom ("Hohenzollern") and on the right to a compulsory portion and provides information on inheritance law developments in European law. The commentary on A1922 focuses on the interfaces between inheritance law and company law and legal succession in public law positions. Succession in accordance with the law of life partnerships is also shown under statutory succession. The latest case law on transitional social security regulations is also taken into account in the context of rights to disclaim an estate. The new fees law for the curators of estates is also explained.