|
|
Books > Social sciences > Psychology > States of consciousness > General
Blindsight is an unusual condition where the sufferer can respond
to visual stimuli, while lacking any conscious feeling of having
seen the stimuli. It occurs after a particular form of brain
injury.
The first edition of Blindsight, by one of the pioneers in the
field - Lawrence Weiskrantz, reported studies of a patient with
this condition. It was an important, much cited publication. In the
past twenty years, further work has been done in this area, and
this new edition brings the book up to date. Retaining the original
text, but adding a substantial new chapter and colour
illustrations, the first section of the book summarizes findings on
DB since the last published account in 1986. The second part
includes information on other new research that has occurred since
the last edition. As well as giving an account of research over a
number of years into a particular case of blindsight, it provides a
discussion of the historical and neurological background, a review
of cases reported by other investigators, and a number of
theoretical and practical issues and implications.
The book will be valuable for cognitive psychologists and cognitive
neuroscientists, as well as philosophers of mind.
In recent years consciousness has become a significant area of
study in the cognitive sciences. The Frontiers of Consciousness is
a major interdisciplinary exploration of consciousness. The book
stems from the Chichele lectures held at All Souls College in
Oxford, and features contributions from a 'who's who' of
authorities from both philosophy and psychology. The result is a
truly interdisciplinary volume, which tackles some of the biggest
and most impenetrable problems in consciousness.
The book includes chapters considering the apparent explanatory gap
between science and consciousness, our conscious experience of
emotions such as fear, and of willed actions by ourselves and
others. It looks at subjective differences between two ways in
which visual information guides behaviour, and scientific
investigation of consciousness in non-human animals. It looks at
the challenges that the mind-brain relation presents for clinical
practice as well as for theories of consciousness. The book draws
on leading research from philosophy, experimental psychology,
functional imaging of the brain, neuropsychology, neuroscience, and
clinical neurology.
Distinctive in its accessibility, authority, and its depth of
coverage, Frontiers of Consciousness will be a groundbreaking and
influential addition to the consciousness literature.
This book is a compilation of nine short books written between 2007
and 2021, in the ninth and tenth decades of the author's life. It
contains his spiritual philosophy expressed in simple language
accessible to all. The book tells of what the author has come to
believe after a lifetime of seeking for the meaning of life, and
how one should live that life at its optimum level. He explains
that this cannot be proved: it is ultimately not susceptible to the
usual scientific methods, for it lies in a different realm of
reality which has to be experienced inwardly. However, its main
tenets lie behind world religions and go back to mankind`s earliest
thinkings and feelings. Believe it or not as you will, suggests the
author. All he can say is that it has sustained him throughout his
life and has made that life harmonious and joyous. The teachings of
which he speaks are often referred to as the Ancient Wisdom. He
first came across them at the age of twenty-five when he met a man
who was well versed in that ancient wisdom which is to be found
woven throughout major religions, philosophies and mystical
teachings. This man was Eugene Halliday, who, the author says, was
said to be one of the great spirits of the modern age. The phrase
he used to describe the ultimate result of these teachings was
'Reflexive Self-Consciousness'. This, the author explains, was the
same message taught by those of old, although expressed by his
mentor Halliday in more modern terms. A wise but modest man, the
author says that he is no academic or scholar or learned man -
adding, with gentle humour, that it is written that an academic is
an ass with a load of books on his back. He writes for the average
person - of any age - who has no time left to think on these things
but who may like to know more. He writes for this person - for he
is such a one himself, he says. It is this which makes his story
and his accumulated wisdom both inspiring and accessible.
Over the past three decades, the challenge that conscious
experience poses to physicalism--the widely held view that the
universe is a completely physical system--has provoked a growing
debate in philosophy of mind studies and given rise to a great deal
of literature on the subject. Ideal for courses in consciousness
and the philosophy of mind, Consciousness and The Mind-Body
Problem: A Reader presents thirty-three classic and contemporary
readings, organized into five sections that cover the major issues
in this debate: the challenge for physicalism, physicalist
responses, alternative responses, the significance of ignorance,
and mental causation. Edited by Torin Alter and Robert J. Howell,
the volume features work from such leading figures as Karen
Bennett, Ned Block, David J. Chalmers, Frank Jackson, Colin McGinn,
David Papineau, and many others. It is enhanced by a thorough
general introduction by the editors, which explains the hard
problem of consciousness--the question of how any physical
phenomenon could give rise to conscious experience.The introduction
also provides historical and conceptual background and explains how
the consciousness/mind-body problem is related to such theories as
the identity theory, dualism, and functionalism. In addition,
accessible introductions outline the themes and readings contained
in each section.
Although psychoanalytic criticism has long been established as a
practice in its own right, dialogue between the clinical and
aesthetic has so far been perfunctory. This innovative book sets
out to show in detail that there is a poetics of the unconscious
equally at work in both domains, the critical potential of which
has been missed by both sides.
In Part I, Wright focuses on the discoveries of Freudian
psychoanalysis and demonstrates how the fundamental fantasies
emerging in clinical practice are uncannily shared by works of art.
This devotion of the unconscious to its phantasmic history is
illustrated with examples from Freud, surrealist painting and Julia
Kristeva's work on melancholia. In Part II, the focus shifts to
Lacan's view of language as a means of agitating the unconscious of
the reader. Part III takes examples from the rhetoric of clinical
discourse, showing how practitioners are aware of a range of poetic
meanings for both patient and analyst. The three parts demonstrate
that all language is inescapably figural, as it betrays the
operations of desire and fantasy in both aesthetic and clinical
discourse.
This book is suitable for second- and third-year undergraduate
students and above in literature and literary theory, feminism and
gender studies, and psychoanalysis.
Knowledge is a big subject, says Stuart Firestein, but ignorance is
a bigger one. And it is ignorance-not knowledge-that is the true
engine of science. Most of us have a false impression of science as
a surefire, deliberate, step-by-step method for finding things out
and getting things done. In fact, says Firestein, more often than
not, science is like looking for a black cat in a dark room, and
there may not be a cat in the room. The process is more hit-or-miss
than you might imagine, with much stumbling and groping after
phantoms. But it is exactly this "not knowing," this puzzling over
thorny questions or inexplicable data, that gets researchers into
the lab early and keeps them there late, the thing that propels
them, the very driving force of science. Firestein shows how
scientists use ignorance to program their work, to identify what
should be done, what the next steps are, and where they should
concentrate their energies. And he includes a catalog of how
scientists use ignorance, consciously or unconsciously-a remarkable
range of approaches that includes looking for connections to other
research, revisiting apparently settled questions, using small
questions to get at big ones, and tackling a problem simply out of
curiosity. The book concludes with four case histories-in cognitive
psychology, theoretical physics, astronomy, and neuroscience-that
provide a feel for the nuts and bolts of ignorance, the day-to-day
battle that goes on in scientific laboratories and in scientific
minds with questions that range from the quotidian to the profound.
Turning the conventional idea about science on its head, Ignorance
opens a new window on the true nature of research. It is a
must-read for anyone curious about science.
It has long been one of the most fundamental problems of
philosophy, and it is now, John Searle writes, "the most important
problem in the biological sciences": What is consciousness? Is my
inner awareness of myself something separate from my body?
In what began as a series of essays in The New York Review of
Books, John Searle evaluates the positions on consciousness of such
well-known scientists and philosophers as Francis Crick, Gerald
Edelman, Roger Penrose, Daniel Dennett, David Chalmers, and Israel
Rosenfield. He challenges claims that the mind works like a
computer, and that brain functions can be reproduced by computer
programs. With a sharp eye for confusion and contradiction, he
points out which avenues of current research are most likely to
come up with a biological examination of how conscious states are
caused by the brain.
Only when we understand how the brain works will we solve the
mystery of consciousness, and only then will we begin to understand
issues ranging from artificial intelligence to our very nature as
human beings.
A carefully selected volume tracing the development of
countertransference-the emotional reaction of an analyst to their
subject In Essential Papers on Countertransference, Benjamin
Wolstein has carefully gathered the classic essays which trace the
development of countertransference as a psychoanalytic concept and
explore the various ways in which it has been defined and used by
various psychoanalytic schools. The volume includes selections from
the work of Sigmund Freud, D. W. Winnicott, Clara Thompson, Harold
F. Searles, and Heinrich Racker, among others. Wolstein's
introduction offers a provocative perspective on the concept of
countertransference and places in context the many controversies
surrounding its use by analysts. Contributors: Mabel Blake Cohen,
Ralph M. Crowley, Lawrence Epstein, Arthur H. Feiner, Sandor
Ferenczi, Sigmund Freud, Merton M. Gill, Douglas W. Orr, Heinrich
Racker, Otto Rank, Theodor Reik, Janet MacKenzie Rioch, Harold F.
Searles, Leo Stone, Edward S. Tauber, Clara Thompson, Lucia E.
Tower, and D. W. Winnicott.
What occurs within coma? What does the coma patient experience? How
does the patient perceive the world outside of coma, if at all? The
simple answer to these questions is that we don't know. Yet the
sheer volume of literary and media texts would have us believe that
we do. Examining representations of coma and brain injury across a
variety of texts, this book investigates common tropes and
linguistic devices used to portray the medical condition of coma,
giving rise to universal mythologies and misconceptions in the
public domain. Matthew Colbeck looks at how these texts represent,
or fail to represent, long-term brain injury, drawing on narratives
of coma survivors that have been produced and curated through
writing groups he has run over the last 10 years. Discussing a
diverse range of cultural works, including novels by Irvine Welsh,
Stephen King, Tom McCarthy and Douglas Coupland, as well as film
and media texts such as The Sopranos, Kill Bill, Coma and The
Walking Dead, Colbeck provides an explanation for our fascination
with coma. With a proliferation of misleading stories of survival
in the media and in literature, this book explores the potential
impact these have upon our own understanding of coma and its
victims.
|
|