|
|
Books > Professional & Technical > Agriculture & farming > Animal husbandry > General
These guidelines support a harmonized international approach to
assessing the impacts of livestock on biodiversity. The livestock
sector is a major user of natural resources (land in particular)
and contributor to pollution (causing nutrient losses and
increasing greenhouse gas emissions), which makes it a sector with
a high impact on biodiversity. However, livestock production is one
of the few sectors with not only negative but also positive impacts
on biodiversity. The sector can therefore pull two levers to
improve its biodiversity performance - mitigate harm and maximise
benefits. Yet many environmental assessments of the livestock
sector have not addressed biodiversity because of its intrinsic
complexity. These guidelines, developed by the Technical Advisory
Group on biodiversity - a team of 25 international experts in
ecology, biodiversity indicators, agronomy, and environmental
science - strive to include biodiversity in such assessments, to
improve understanding of livestock's impact on biodiversity and to
reveal possible synergies or trade-offs with other environmental
criteria and the Sustainable Development Goals.
Sheep Flock Health: a planned approach is a practical guide to the
diagnosis and management of production limiting diseases of sheep.
The problem-based approach helps both farmers and veterinary
practitioners identify health problems. The focus is on good
management practices to prevent disease in the first place and to
optimise production. The emphasis is on overall flock health rather
than treatment of individual animals.
* Supports decision making for sheep flock health management
* Promotes a planned approach to reduce the risk of disease
* Provides an immediate source of reference when considering a
sheep flock health issue
In this book on Indian cattle ranching, Peter Iverson describes
a way of life that has been both economically viable and socially
and culturally rewarding. Thus an Indian rancher can demonstrate
his generosity and his concern for the well-being of others by
giving cattle or beef to relatives, or by feeding people at a
celebration. An expert rider possesses a skill appreciated by
others. A rancher who raises prime cattle demonstrates that Indians
can compete in an activity that dominates the surrounding
non-Indian society.
Focusing on the northern plains and the Southwest, Iverson
traces the rise and fall of individual and tribal cattle industries
against the backdrop of changing federal Indian policies. He
describes the Indian Bureau's inability to recognize that most
nineteenth-century reservations were better suited to ranching than
farming. Even though allotment and leasing stifled ranching,
livestock became symbols and ranching a new means of resisting,
adapting, and living--for remaining Native.
In the twentieth century, allotment, leasing, non-Indian
competition, and a changing regional economy have limited the
long-term economic success of Indian ranching. Although the New
Deal era saw some marked improvements in Native ranching
operations, Iverson suggests that since the 1960s, Indian and
non-Indian ranchers alike have faced the same dilemma that
confronted Indians in the nineteenth century: they are surrounded
by a society that does not understand them and has different
priorities for their land. Cattle ranching is no more likely to
disappear than are the Indian communities themselves, but cowboys
and Indians, who share a common sense of place and tradition, also
share an uncertain future.
|
|