|
|
Books > Humanities > Religion & beliefs > General > Religious intolerance, persecution & conflict > General
In a world torn by religious antagonism, lessons can be learned
from medieval Spanish villages where Muslims, Christians, and Jews
rubbed shoulders on a daily basis--sharing irrigation canals,
bathhouses, municipal ovens, and marketplaces. Medieval Spaniards
introduced Europeans to paper manufacture, Hindu-Arabic numerals,
philosophical classics, algebra, citrus fruits, cotton, and new
medical techniques. Her mystics penned classics of Kabbalah and
Sufism. More astonishing than Spain's wide-ranging accomplishments,
however, was the simple fact that until the destruction of the last
Muslim Kingdom by King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella in 1492,
Spain's Muslims, Christians, and Jews often managed to bestow
tolerance and freedom of worship on the minorities in their midst.
A Vanished World chronicles this panoramic sweep of human history
and achievement, encompassing both the agony of Jihad, Crusades,
and Inquisition, and the glory of a multi-religious, multi-cultural
civilization that forever changed the West. Lowney shows how these
three controversial religious groups once lived and worked together
in Spain, creating commerce, culture, art, and architecture. He
reveals how these three faith groups eventually veered into a
thicket of resentment and violence, and shows how our current
policies and approaches might lead us down the same path. Rising
above politics, propaganda, and name-calling, A Vanished World
provides a hopeful meditation on how relations among these three
faith groups have gone wrong and some ideas on how to make their
interactions right.
Conflict and dispute pervade political and policy discussions.
Moreover, unequal power relations tend to heighten levels of
conflict. In this context of contention, figuring out ways to
accommodate others and reach solutions that are agreeable to all is
a perennial challenge for activists, politicians, planners, and
policymakers. John Forester is one of America's eminent scholars of
progressive planning and dispute resolution in the policy arena,
and in Dealing with Differences he focuses on a series of 'hard
cases'--conflicts that appeared to be insoluble yet which were
resolved in the end. Forester ranges across the country--from
Hawaii to Maryland to Washington State--and across issues--the
environment, ethnic conflict, and HIV. Throughout, he focuses on
how innovative mediators settled seemingly intractable disputes.
Between pessimism masquerading as 'realism' and the unrealistic
idealism that 'we can all get along, ' Forester identifies the
middle terrain where disputes do actually get resolved in ways that
offer something for all sides. Dealing with Differences serves as
an authoritative and fundamentally pragmatic pathway for anyone who
has to engage in the highly contentious worlds of planning and
policymaking.
Discrimination against Muslim Americans has soared over the last
two decades with hostility growing especially acute since 2016 - in
no small part due to targeted attacks by policymakers and media.
Outsiders at Home offers the first systematic, empirically driven
examination of status of Muslim Americans in US democracy,
evaluating the topic from a variety of perspectives. To what extent
do Muslim Americans face discrimination by legislators, the media,
and the general public? What trends do we see over time, and how
have conditions shifted? What, if anything, can be done to reverse
course? How do Muslim Americans view their position, and what are
the psychic and sociopolitical tolls? Answering each of these
questions, Nazita Lajevardi shows that the rampant, mostly negative
discussion of Muslims in media and national discourse has yielded
devastating political and social consequences.
Professor Roberts examines the relationship between antisemitism
and the practices of citizenship in a colonial context. She focuses
on the experience of Algerian Jews and their evolving identity as
citizens as they competed with the other populations in the colony,
including newly naturalised non-French settlers and Algerian
Muslims, for control over the scarce resources of the colonial
state. The author argues that this resulted in antisemitic violence
and hotly contested debates over the nature of French identity and
rights of citizenship. Tracing the ambiguities and tensions that
Algerian Jews faced, the book shows that antisemitism was not
coherent or stable but changed in response to influences within
Algeria, and from metropolitan France, Europe and the Middle East.
Written for a wide audience, this title contributes to several
fields including Jewish history, colonial and empire studies,
antisemitism within municipal politics, and citizenship, and adds
to current debates on transnationalism and globalization.
The Idea of Semitic Monotheism examines some major aspects of the
scholarly study of religion in the long nineteenth century-from the
Enlightenment to the First World War. It aims to understand the new
status of Judaism and Islam in the formative period of the new
discipline. Guy G. Stroumsa focuses on the concept of Semitic
monotheism, a concept developed by Ernest Renan around the
mid-nineteenth century on the basis of the postulated and highly
problematic contradistinction between Aryan and Semitic families of
peoples, cultures, and religions. This contradistinction grew from
the Western discovery of Sanskrit and its relationship with
European languages, at the time of the Enlightenment and
Romanticism. Together with the rise of scholarly Orientalism, this
discovery offered new perspectives on the East, as a consequence of
which the Near East was demoted from its traditional status as the
locus of the Biblical revelations. This innovative work studies a
central issue in the modern study of religion. Doing so, however,
it emphasizes the new dualistic taxonomy of religions had major
consequences and sheds new light on the roots of European attitudes
to Jews and Muslims in the twentieth century, up to the present
day.
The Thirty Years' War (1618-48) was Europe's most destructive
conflict prior to the two world wars. Two of European history's
greatest generals faced each other at Lutzen in November 1632,
mid-way through this terrible war. Neither achieved his objective.
Albrecht von Wallenstein withdrew his battered imperial army at
nightfall, unaware that his opponent, King Gustavus Adolphus of
Sweden, had died a few hours earlier. The indecisive military
outcome found an immediate echo in image and print, and became the
object of political and historical disputes. Swedish propaganda
swiftly fostered the lasting image of the king's sacrifice for the
Protestant cause against the spectre of Catholic Habsburg
'universal monarchy'. The standard assumption that the king had
'met his death in the hour of victory' became integral to how
Gustavus Adolphus's contribution to modern warfare has been
remembered, even celebrated, while the study of Lutzen's wider
legacy shows how such events are constantly rewritten as elements
of propaganda, religious and national identity, and professional
military culture. The battle's religious and political associations
also led to its adoption as a symbol by those advocating German
unification under Prussian leadership. The battlefield remains a
place of pilgrimage to this day and a site for the celebration of
Protestant German and Nordic culture. This book is the first to
combine analysis of the battle itself with an assessment of its
cultural, political and military legacy, and the first to
incorporate recent archaeological research within a reappraisal of
the events and their significance. It challenges the accepted view
that Lutzen is a milestone in military development, arguing instead
that its impact was more significant on the cultural and political
level.
The far right is on the rise across Europe, pushing a battle
scenario in which Islam clashes with Christianity as much as
Christianity clashes with Islam. From the margins to the
mainstream, far-right protesters and far-right politicians call for
the defence of Europe's Christian culture. The far right claims
Christianity. This book investigates contemporary far-right claims
to Christianity. Ulrich Schmiedel and Hannah Strommen examine the
theologies that emerge in the far right across Europe,
concentrating on Norway, Germany and Great Britain. They explore
how churches in these three countries have been complicit,
complacent or critical of the far right, sometimes intentionally
and sometimes unintentionally. Ultimately, Schmiedel and Strommen
encourage a creative and collaborative theological response. To
counter the far right, Christianity needs to be practiced in an
open and open-ended way which calls Christians into contact with
Muslims.
While there exists no evidence to date that the indigenous inhabitants of Arabia knew of holy war prior to Islam, holy war ideas and behaviours appear already among Muslims during the first generation. Reuven Firestone focuses on why and how such a seemingly radical development took place. Basing his hypothesis on evidence from the Qur'an and early Islamic literary sources, Firestone locates the origin of Islamic holy war and traces its evolution as a response to the changes affecting the new community of Muslims in its transition from ancient Arabian culture to the religious civilization of Islam.
For Christians living as a persecuted minority in the Middle East,
the question of whether their allegiance should lie with their
faith or with the national communities they live in is a difficult
one. This collection of essays aims to reconcile this conflict of
allegiance by looking at the biblical vision of citizenship and
showing that Christians can live and work as citizens of the state
without compromising their beliefs and make a constructive
contribution to the life of the countries they live in. The
contributors come from a range of prestigious academic and
religious posts and provide analysis on a range of issues such as
dual nationalism, patriotism and the increase of Islamic
fundamentalism. An insightful look into the challenges religious
minorities face in countries where they are a minority, these
essays provide a peace-building and reconciliatory conclusion for
readers to consider.
'Wonderfully written and characteristically brilliant' Peter
Frankopan, author of The Silk Roads 'Elegant, readable ... an
impressive synthesis ... Not many historians could have done it' -
Jonathan Sumption, Spectator 'Tyerman's book is fascinating not
just for what it has to tell us about the Crusades, but for the
mirror it holds up to today's religious extremism' - Tom Holland,
Spectator Thousands left their homelands in the Middle Ages to
fight wars abroad. But how did the Crusades actually happen? From
recruitment propaganda to raising money, ships to siege engines,
medicine to the power of prayer, this vivid, surprising history
shows holy war - and medieval society - in a new light.
The Templars' and Hospitallers' daily business of recruitment,
fund-raising, farming, shipping and communal life explored
alongside their commitment to crusading. The military and religious
orders of the Knights Templar (founded 1120) and Knights
Hospitaller (founded c.1099) were a driving force throughout the
long history of the crusades. This study examines the work of the
two orders closely, using original charters to analyse their
activities in their administrative heartland in south-west France,
and sets them in the context of contemporary religious life and
economic organisation. Recruitment, fund-raising, farming,
shipping, and communal life are all touched upon, and the orders'
commitment to crusading through control and supply of manpower,
money, arms and supplies is assessed. Dr Selwood shows the orders
at the centre of religious life in Occitania, highlighting their
success compared with other new orders such as the Cistercians, and
looking at their relationships with the secular and monastic
Church. Other themes addressed include the orders' relationshipto
Occitanian society and to the laiety, their involvement with
pilgrimage to Jerusalem, their innovative administrative
structures, and their logistical operations. DOMINIC SELWOOD gained
his Ph.D. at Oxford; he is now a barrister at Lincoln's Inn, and
practices from chambers in the Inner Temple.
State sponsorship of terrorism is a complex and important topic in
today's international affairs - and especially pertinent in the
regional politics of the Middle East and South Asia, where Pakistan
has long been a flashpoint of Islamist politics and terrorism. In
Islamism and Intelligence in South Asia, Prem Mahadevan
demonstrates how over several decades, radical Islamists, sometimes
with the tacit support of parts of the military establishment, have
weakened democratic governance in Pakistan and acquired
progressively larger influence over policy-making. Mahadevan traces
this history back to the anti-colonial Deobandi movement, which was
born out of the post-partition political atmosphere and a
rediscovery of the thinking of Ibn Taymiyyah, and partially
ennobled the idea of `jihad' in South Asia as a righteous war
against foreign oppression. Using Pakistani media and academic
sources for the bulk of its raw data, and reinforcing this with
scholarly analysis from Western commentators, the book tracks
Pakistan's trajectory towards a `soft' Islamic revolution.
Envisioned by the country's intelligence community as a solution to
chronic governance failures, these narratives called for a
re-orientation away from South Asia and towards the Middle East. In
the process, Pakistan has become a sanctuary for Arab jihadist
groups, such as Al-Qaeda, who had no previous ethnic or linguistic
connection with South Asia. Most alarmingly, official discourse on
terrorism has been partly silenced by the military-intelligence
complex. The result is a slow drift towards extremism and possible
legitimation of internationally proscribed terrorist organizations
in Pakistan's electoral politics.
|
|