|
|
Books > Social sciences > Sociology, social studies > Crime & criminology > Penology & punishment > General
Sentencing Policy and Social Justice argues that the promotion of
social justice should become a key objective of sentencing policy,
advancing the argument that the legitimacy of sentencing ultimately
depends upon the strength of the relationship between social
morality and penal ideology. It sheds light on how shared moral
values can influence sentencing policy at a time when relationships
of community appear increasingly fragmented, arguing that
sentencing will be better placed to make a positive contribution to
social justice if it becomes more sensitive to the
commonly-accepted moral boundaries that underpin adherence to the
'rule of law'. The need to reflect public opinion in sentencing has
received significant attention more recently, with renewed interest
in jury sentencing, 'stakeholder sentencing', and the involvement
of community views when regulating policy. The author, however,
advocates a different approach, combining a new theoretical focus
with practical suggestions for reform, and arguing that the
contribution sentencing can make to social justice necessitates a
fundamental change in the way shared values about the advantages of
punishment are reflected in penal ideology and sentencing policy.
Using examples from international, comparative and domestic
contexts to advance the moral and ethical case for challenging the
existing theories of sentencing, the book develops the author's
previous theoretical ideas and outlines how these changes could be
given practical shape within the context of sentencing in England
and Wales. It assesses the consequences for penal governance due to
increased state regulation of discretionary sentencing power and
examines the prospects for achieving the kind of moral
transformation regarded as necessary to reverse such a move. To
illustrate these issues each chapter focuses on a particularly
problematic area for contemporary sentencing policy; namely, the
sentencing of women; the sentencing of irregular migrants;
sentencing for offences of serious public disorder; and sentencing
for financial crime.
In this path-breaking book, David Garland argues that punishment is
a complex social institution that affects both social relations and
cultural meanings. Drawing on theorists from Durkheim to Foucault,
he insightfully critiques the entire spectrum of social thought
concerning punishment, and reworks it into a new interpretive
synthesis.
""Punishment and Modern Society" is an outstanding delineation of
the sociology of punishment. At last the process that is surely the
heart and soul of criminology, and perhaps of sociology as
well--punishment--has been rescued from the fringes of these
'disciplines'. . . . This book is a first-class piece of
scholarship."--Graeme Newman, "Contemporary Sociology"
"Garland's treatment of the theorists he draws upon is erudite,
faithful and constructive. . . . "Punishment and Modern Society" is
a magnificent example of "working" social theory."--John R. Sutton,
"American Journal of Sociology"
""Punishment and Modern Society" lifts contemporary penal issues
from the mundane and narrow contours within which they are so often
discussed and relocates them at the forefront of public policy. . .
. This book will become a landmark study."--Andrew Rutherford,
"Legal Studies"
"This is a superbly intelligent study. Its comprehensive coverage
makes it a genuine review of the field. Its scholarship and
incisiveness of judgment will make it a constant reference work for
the initiated, and its concluding theoretical synthesis will make
it a challenge and inspiration for those undertaking research and
writing on the subject. As a state-of-the-art account it is
unlikely to be bettered for many a year."--Rod Morgan, "British
Journal of Criminology"
Winner of both the Outstanding Scholarship Award of the Crime and
Delinquency Division of the Society for the Study of Social
Problems and the Distinguished Scholar Award from the American
Sociological Association's Crime, Law, and Deviance Section
Young Criminal Lives is the first cradle-to-grave study of the
experiences of some of the thousands of delinquent, difficult and
destitute children passing through the early English juvenile
reformatory system. The book breaks new ground in crime research,
speaking to pressing present-day concerns around child poverty and
youth justice, and resonating with a powerful public fascination
for family history. Using innovative digital methods to unlock the
Victorian life course, the authors have reconstructed the lives,
families and neighbourhoods of 500 children living within, or at
the margins of, the early English juvenile reformatory system. Four
hundred of them were sent to reformatory and industrial schools in
the north west of England from courts around the UK over a
fifty-year period from the 1860s onwards. Young Criminal Lives is
based on one of the most comprehensive sets of official and
personal data ever assembled for a historical study of this kind.
For the first time, these children can be followed on their journey
in and out of reform and then though their adulthood and old age.
The book centres on institutions celebrated in this period for
their pioneering new approaches to child welfare and others that
were investigated for cruelty and scandal. Both were typical of the
new kind of state-certified provision offered, from the 1850s on,
to children who had committed criminal acts, or who were considered
'vulnerable' to predation, poverty and the 'inheritance' of
criminal dispositions. The notion that interventions can and must
be evaluated in order to determine 'what works' now dominates
public policy. But how did Victorian and Edwardian policy-makers
and practitioners deal with this question? By what criteria, and on
the basis of what kinds of evidence, did they judge their own
successes and failures? Young Criminal Lives ends with a critical
review of the historical rise of evidence-based policy-making
within criminal justice. It will appeal to scholars and students of
crime and penal policy, criminologists, sociologists, and social
policy researchers and practitioners in youth justice and child
protection.
This book discusses some rituals of justice-such as public
executions, printed responses to the Archbishop of Canterbury's
execution speech, and King Charles I's treason trial-in early
modern England. Focusing on the ways in which genres shape these
events' multiple voices, I analyze the rituals' genres and the
diverse perspectives from which we must understand them. The
execution ritual, like such cultural forms as plays and films, is a
collaborative production that can be understood only, and only
incompletely, by being alert to the presence of its many
participants and their contributions. Each of these participants
brings a voice to the execution ritual, whether it is the judge and
jury or the victim, executioner, sheriff and other authorities,
spiritual counselors, printer, or spectators and readers. And each
has at least one role to play. No matter how powerful some
institutions and individuals may appear, none has a monopoly over
authority and how the events take shape on and beyond the scaffold.
The centerpiece of the mid-seventeenth-century's theatre of death
was the condemned man's last dying utterance. This study focuses on
the words and contexts of many of those final speeches, including
King Charles I's (1649), Archbishop William Laud's (1645), and the
Earl of Strafford's (1641), as well as those of less well known
royalists and regicides. Where we situate ourselves to view, hear,
and comprehend a public execution-through specific participants'
eyes, ears, and minds or accounts-shapes our interpretation of the
ritual. It is impossible to achieve a singular, carefully
indoctrinated meaning of an event as complex as a state-sponsored
public execution. Along with the variety of voices and meanings,
the nature and purpose of the rituals of justice maintain a
significant amount of consistency in a number of eras and cultural
contexts. Whether the focus is on the trial and execution of the
Marian martyrs, English royalists in the 1640s and 1650s, or the
Restoration's regicides, the events draw on a set of cultural
expectations or conventions. Because rituals of justice are shaped
by diverse voices and agendas, with the participants' scripts and
counterscripts converging and colliding, they are dramatic moments
conveying profound meanings. Published by University of Delaware
Press. Distributed worldwide by Rutgers University Press.
NU SOCIETY IN A NU AGE Creating the Kingdom of Heaven on Earth This
presentation spells out a step-by-step process of correcting the
corrections system in order to correct the society, as follows: Our
corrections system is by far the largest in the world, with 25% of
all prisoners in the world in our prisons, even though we only have
5% of the world's population. PEACE PLEASE proposes that through
our experimental prison program called "Project Nu Life" 1. we can
create a model program that trains prisoners in the behaviors of a
responsible citizen so that they do not return to crime and prison;
2. which will thereby become a model for systematically reducing
crime in the larger society; 3. which will thereby become a model
for reducing law enforcement, security measures, courts, jails, and
prisons; 4. which will thereby become a model for restructuring the
larger society based on the model of this successful prison
program. How would this work? "Project Nu Life" provides: Twelve
Essential Services to Prevent Released Prisoners from Returning to
Crime and Prison 1. training in the behaviors of a responsible
citizen 2. job training and jobs 3. low-income and rent-to-own
housing 4. financial assistance 5. health insurance 6. literacy
training 7. a support network 8. seeing prisoners as good people
with bad behaviors, not as bad people 9. forgiveness and
non-condemnation 10. mutually supportive male-female relationships
11. encouraging our prisoners to strive for a higher purpose in
life than the accumulation of material possessions 12. a retirement
income
In Everyday Desistance, Laura Abrams and Diane J. Terry examine the
lives of young people who spent considerable time in and out of
correctional institutions as adolescents. These formerly
incarcerated youth often struggle with the onset of adult
responsibilities at a much earlier age than their more privileged
counterparts. In the context of urban Los Angeles, with a
large-scale gang culture and diminished employment prospects,
further involvement in crime appears almost inevitable. Yet, as
Abrams and Terry point out, these formerly imprisoned youth are
often quite resilient and can be successful at creating lives for
themselves after months or even years of living in institutions run
by the juvenile justice system. This book narrates the day-to-day
experiences of these young men and women, focusing on their
attempts to surmount the challenges of adulthood, resisting a
return to criminal activity, and formulating long-term goals for a
secure adult future.
Thousands of pregnant women pass through our nation's jails every
year. What happens to them as they carry their pregnancies in a
space of punishment? In this time when the public safety net is
frayed, incarceration has become a central and racialized strategy
for managing the poor. Using her ethnographic fieldwork and
clinical work as an ob-gyn in a women's jail, Carolyn Sufrin
explores how jail has, paradoxically, become a place where women
can find care. Focusing on the experiences of incarcerated pregnant
women as well as on the practices of the jail guards and health
providers who care for them, Jailcare describes the contradictory
ways that care and maternal identity emerge within a punitive space
presumed to be devoid of care. Sufrin argues that jail is not
simply a disciplinary institution that serves to punish. Rather,
when understood in the context of the poverty, addiction, violence,
and racial oppression that characterize these women's lives and
their reproduction, jail can become a safety net for women on the
margins of society.
For courses in Introduction to Corrections and Corrections Theory
and Policy Brief. Affordable. Visual. Corrections provides an
affordable, thought-provoking look at corrections that uses clear
writing and eye-catching visuals to get your students straight to
the important concepts. By focusing on these core concepts,
students will gain true understanding of the material, without
becoming overwhelmed with unnecessary information. The text
examines how evidence-based practices are used in corrections and
how theory is linked to treatment and punishment of offenders. The
book's conversation-starting pedagogy encourages active
participation in learning, encouraging students to think critically
about community corrections, prison life, treatment of offenders,
reentry, legal issues, the death penalty, and juveniles in
corrections. Corrections, Third Edition is also available via Revel
(TM), an interactive learning environment that enables students to
read, practice, and study in one continuous experience.
In The Gulag after Stalin, Jeffrey S. Hardy reveals how the vast
Soviet penal system was reimagined and reformed in the wake of
Stalin's death. Hardy argues that penal reform in the 1950s was a
serious endeavor intended to transform the Gulag into a humane
institution that reeducated criminals into honest Soviet citizens.
Under the leadership of Minister of Internal Affairs Nikolai
Dudorov, a Khrushchev appointee, this drive to change the Gulag
into a "progressive" system where criminals were reformed through a
combination of education, vocational training, leniency, sport,
labor, cultural programs, and self-governance was both sincere and
at least partially effective. The new vision for the Gulag faced
many obstacles. Reeducation proved difficult to quantify, a serious
liability in a statistics-obsessed state. The entrenched habits of
Gulag officials and the prisoner-guard power dynamic mitigated the
effect of the post-Stalin reforms. And the Soviet public never
fully accepted the new policies of leniency and the humane
treatment of criminals. In the late 1950s, they joined with a
coalition of party officials, criminologists, procurators,
newspaper reporters, and some penal administrators to rally around
the slogan "The camp is not a resort" and succeeded in reimposing
harsher conditions for inmates. By the mid-1960s the Soviet Gulag
had emerged as a hybrid system forged from the old Stalinist
system, the vision promoted by Khrushchev and others in the
mid-1950s, and the ensuing counterreform movement. This new penal
equilibrium largely persisted until the fall of the Soviet Union.
In this pathbreaking book, Dan Berger offers a bold reconsideration
of twentieth century black activism, the prison system, and the
origins of mass incarceration. Throughout the civil rights era,
black activists thrust the prison into public view, turning
prisoners into symbols of racial oppression while arguing that
confinement was an inescapable part of black life in the United
States. Black prisoners became global political icons at a time
when notions of race and nation were in flux. Showing that the
prison was a central focus of the black radical imagination from
the 1950s through the 1980s, Berger traces the dynamic and dramatic
history of this political struggle. The prison shaped the rise and
spread of black activism, from civil rights demonstrators willfully
risking arrests to the many current and former prisoners that built
or joined organizations such as the Black Panther Party. Grounded
in extensive research, Berger engagingly demonstrates that such
organizing made prison walls porous and influenced generations of
activists that followed.
Public schools across the nation have turned to the criminal
justice system as a gold standard of discipline. As public schools
and offices of justice have become collaborators in punishment,
rates of African American suspension and expulsion have soared,
drop out rates have accelerated, and prison populations have
exploded. Nowhere, perhaps, has the War on Crime been more
influential in broadening racialized academic and socioeconomic
disparity than in New Orleans, Louisiana, where in 2002 the
criminal sheriff opened his own public school at the Orleans Parish
Prison. "The Prison School," as locals called it, enrolled
low-income African American boys who had been removed from regular
public schools because of nonviolent disciplinary offenses, such as
tardiness and insubordination. By examining this school in the
local and national context, Lizbet Simmons shows how young black
males are in the liminal state of losing educational affiliation
while being caught in the net of correctional control. In The
Prison School, she asks how schools and prisons became so
intertwined. What does this mean for students, communities, and a
democratic society? And how do we unravel the ties that bind the
racialized realities of school failure and mass incarceration?
|
|