|
Books > Social sciences > Sociology, social studies > Crime & criminology > Penology & punishment > General
In this path-breaking book, David Garland argues that punishment is
a complex social institution that affects both social relations and
cultural meanings. Drawing on theorists from Durkheim to Foucault,
he insightfully critiques the entire spectrum of social thought
concerning punishment, and reworks it into a new interpretive
synthesis.
""Punishment and Modern Society" is an outstanding delineation of
the sociology of punishment. At last the process that is surely the
heart and soul of criminology, and perhaps of sociology as
well--punishment--has been rescued from the fringes of these
'disciplines'. . . . This book is a first-class piece of
scholarship."--Graeme Newman, "Contemporary Sociology"
"Garland's treatment of the theorists he draws upon is erudite,
faithful and constructive. . . . "Punishment and Modern Society" is
a magnificent example of "working" social theory."--John R. Sutton,
"American Journal of Sociology"
""Punishment and Modern Society" lifts contemporary penal issues
from the mundane and narrow contours within which they are so often
discussed and relocates them at the forefront of public policy. . .
. This book will become a landmark study."--Andrew Rutherford,
"Legal Studies"
"This is a superbly intelligent study. Its comprehensive coverage
makes it a genuine review of the field. Its scholarship and
incisiveness of judgment will make it a constant reference work for
the initiated, and its concluding theoretical synthesis will make
it a challenge and inspiration for those undertaking research and
writing on the subject. As a state-of-the-art account it is
unlikely to be bettered for many a year."--Rod Morgan, "British
Journal of Criminology"
Winner of both the Outstanding Scholarship Award of the Crime and
Delinquency Division of the Society for the Study of Social
Problems and the Distinguished Scholar Award from the American
Sociological Association's Crime, Law, and Deviance Section
Today, we know that crime is often not just a matter of making bad
decisions. Rather, there are a variety of factors that are
implicated in much criminal offending, some fairly obvious like
poverty, mental illness, and drug abuse and others less so, such as
neurocognitive problems. Today, we have the tools for effective
criminal behavioral change, but this cannot be an excuse for
criminal offending. In The Future of Crime and Punishment, William
R. Kelly identifies the need to educate the public on how these
tools can be used to most effectively and cost efficiently reduce
crime, recidivism, victimization and cost. The justice system of
the future needs to be much more collaborative, utilizing the
expertise of a variety of disciplines such as psychology,
psychiatry, addiction, and neuroscience. Judges and prosecutors are
lawyers, not clinicians, and as we transition the justice system to
a focus on behavioral change, the decision making will need to
reflect the input of clinical experts. The path forward is one
characterized largely by change from traditional criminal
prosecution and punishment to venues that balance accountability,
compliance, and risk management with behavioral change
interventions that address the primary underlying causes for
recidivism. There are many moving parts to this effort and it is a
complex proposition. It requires substantial changes to law,
procedure, decision making, roles and responsibilities, expertise,
and funding. Moreover, it requires a radical shift in how we think
about crime and punishment. Our thinking needs to reflect a
perspective that crime is harmful, but that much criminal behavior
is changeable.
Justice is blind...but it's not perfect. Everyday, people are
convicted or accused of crimes they did not commit. Sometimes the
accusations are racially motivated, sometimes they are profiled for
the clothes they wear, and sometimes they are just at the wrong
place at the wrong time. The 15 people in this book all share one
thing in common: they are innocent, but still sent to prison. You
will never look at a court room the same way again
NU SOCIETY IN A NU AGE Creating the Kingdom of Heaven on Earth This
presentation spells out a step-by-step process of correcting the
corrections system in order to correct the society, as follows: Our
corrections system is by far the largest in the world, with 25% of
all prisoners in the world in our prisons, even though we only have
5% of the world's population. PEACE PLEASE proposes that through
our experimental prison program called "Project Nu Life" 1. we can
create a model program that trains prisoners in the behaviors of a
responsible citizen so that they do not return to crime and prison;
2. which will thereby become a model for systematically reducing
crime in the larger society; 3. which will thereby become a model
for reducing law enforcement, security measures, courts, jails, and
prisons; 4. which will thereby become a model for restructuring the
larger society based on the model of this successful prison
program. How would this work? "Project Nu Life" provides: Twelve
Essential Services to Prevent Released Prisoners from Returning to
Crime and Prison 1. training in the behaviors of a responsible
citizen 2. job training and jobs 3. low-income and rent-to-own
housing 4. financial assistance 5. health insurance 6. literacy
training 7. a support network 8. seeing prisoners as good people
with bad behaviors, not as bad people 9. forgiveness and
non-condemnation 10. mutually supportive male-female relationships
11. encouraging our prisoners to strive for a higher purpose in
life than the accumulation of material possessions 12. a retirement
income
The pieces in this collection range from an account of the Skeleton
Army riots against the Salvation Army in the early 1880s to the
unsuccessful campaign to abolish the death penalty in the aftermath
of the Second World War.
Shining new light on early American prison literature--from its
origins in last words, dying warnings, and gallows literature to
its later works of autobiography, expose, and imaginative
literature--"Reading Prisoners" weaves together insights about the
rise of the early American penitentiary, the history of early
American literacy instruction, and the transformation of crime
writing in the "long" eighteenth century.
Looking first at colonial America--an era often said to devalue
jailhouse literacy--Jodi Schorb reveals that in fact this era
launched the literate prisoner into public prominence. Criminal
confessions published between 1700 and 1740, she shows, were
crucial "literacy events" that sparked widespread public
fascination with the reading habits of the condemned, consistent
with the evangelical revivalism that culminated in the first Great
Awakening. By century's end, narratives by condemned criminals
helped an audience of new writers navigate the perils and promises
of expanded literacy.
Schorb takes us off the scaffold and inside the private world of
the first penitentiaries--such as Philadelphia's Walnut Street
Prison and New York's Newgate, Auburn, and Sing Sing. She unveils
the long and contentious struggle over the value of prisoner
education that ultimately led to sporadic efforts to supply
prisoners with books and education. Indeed, a new philosophy
emerged, one that argued that prisoners were best served by silence
and hard labor, not by reading and writing--a stance that a new
generation of convict authors vociferously protested.
The staggering rise of mass incarceration in America since the
1970s has brought the issue of prisoner rehabilitation once again
to the fore. "Reading Prisoners" offers vital background to the
ongoing, crucial debates over the benefits of prisoner education.
An initiative supported by leading political, academic, religious
and professional figures and in association with Queen Mary
University of London. Virtually half-a-century has passed since the
last Royal Commission on the Penal System was dissolved, its work
uncompleted. Looking forwards, six members of the Commission
asserted that 'after some years' a new Royal Commission would be of
great public service. As commentators, writers and practitioners,
Sir Louis Blom-Cooper QC and Professor Sean McConville have many
decades of experience of penal policy and practice. Some 20-years
ago they urged the appointment of a new Royal Commission on the
subject. They have since pressed their case in letters to major
newspapers and in earlier writings. In this publication the
momentum for which is supported by leading figures, they make the
case for a new Royal Commission that will be reflective, effective
and swift, capable of building consensus and providing directions
for generations. They argue that penal policy is fragmented and
frequently irrational, contradictory, counterproductive,
insubstantial and put together in a haphazard way.The dynamics and
pressures of party politics inevitably mean that penal policy often
emerges in response to hard cases and headlines. As this pamphlet
claims, broader and more considered views, drawing on evidence and
seeking to maximise social good, cannot be delivered by politicians
afraid of missing an opportunity to score party political points.
For thousands of years man has been perfecting the gruesome art of
torture. There have been many ways to execute and torture a
person--some make the electric chair look like a paper cut. This
book describes some of the most infamous methods of torture ever
devised, devices that will turn your stomach and make you thankful
that they no longer exist.
Focusing on the intersection of Christianity and politics in the
American penitentiary system, Jennifer Graber explores evangelical
Protestants' efforts to make religion central to emerging practices
and philosophies of prison discipline from the 1790s through the
1850s. Initially, state and prison officials welcomed Protestant
reformers' and ministers' recommendations, particularly their ideas
about inmate suffering and redemption. Over time, however,
officials proved less receptive to the reformers' activities, and
inmates also opposed them. Ensuing debates between reformers,
officials, and inmates revealed deep disagreements over religion's
place in prisons and in the wider public sphere as the separation
of church and state took hold and the nation's religious
environment became more diverse and competitive. Examining the
innovative New York prison system, Graber shows how Protestant
reformers failed to realize their dreams of large-scale inmate
conversion or of prisons that reflected their values. To keep a
foothold in prisons, reformers were forced to relinquish their
Protestant terminology and practices and instead to adopt secular
ideas about American morals, virtues, and citizenship. Graber
argues that, by revising their original understanding of prisoner
suffering and redemption, reformers learned to see inmates'
afflictions not as a necessary prelude to a sinner's experience of
grace but as the required punishment for breaking the new nation's
laws.
|
You may like...
Big Data
Benoit Leclerc, Jesse Cale
Paperback
R1,195
R1,035
Discovery Miles 10 350
|