|
Books > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy > Ethics & moral philosophy > General
|
Digest
(Hardcover)
Quintus Curtius
|
R968
Discovery Miles 9 680
|
Ships in 12 - 17 working days
|
|
Where did the idea of sin arise from? In this meticulously argued
book, David Konstan takes a close look at classical Greek and Roman
texts, as well as the Bible and early Judaic and Christian
writings, and argues that the fundamental idea of "sin" arose in
the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament, although this original
meaning was obscured in later Jewish and Christian interpretations.
Through close philological examination of the words for "sin," in
particular the Hebrew hata' and the Greek hamartia, he traces their
uses over the centuries in four chapters, and concludes that the
common modern definition of sin as a violation of divine law indeed
has antecedents in classical Greco-Roman conceptions, but acquired
a wholly different sense in the Hebrew Bible and New Testament.
|
Hypocrisy
(Hardcover)
James S Spiegel
|
R1,031
R833
Discovery Miles 8 330
Save R198 (19%)
|
Ships in 10 - 15 working days
|
|
Applying Jewish Ethics: Beyond the Rabbinic Tradition is a
groundbreaking collection that introduces the reader to applied
ethics and examines various social issues from contemporary and
largely under-represented, Jewish ethical perspectives. For
thousands of years, a rich and complex system of Jewish ethics has
provided guidance about which values we should uphold and utilize
to confront concrete problems, create a healthy social fabric, and
inspire meaningful lives. Despite its longevity and richness, many
Judaic and secular scholars have misconstrued this ethical
tradition as a strictly religious and biblically based system that
primarily applies to observant Jews, rather than viewing it as an
ethical system that can provide unique and helpful insights to
anyone, religious or not. This pioneering collection offers a deep,
broad, and inclusive understanding of Jewish ethical ideas that
challenges these misconceptions. The chapters explain and apply
these ethical ideas to contemporary issues connected to racial
justice, immigration, gender justice, queer identity, and economic
and environmental justice in ways that illustrate their relevance
for Jews and non-Jews alike.
Reading Augustine is a new line of books offering personal readings
of St. Augustine of Hippo from leading philosophers and religious
scholars. The aim of the series is to make clear Augustine's
importance to contemporary thought and to present Augustine not
only or primarily as a pre-eminent Christian thinker but as a
philosophical, spiritual, literary and intellectual icon of the
West. Why did the ancients come to adopt monotheism and
Christianity? On God, The Soul, Evil and the Rise of Christianity
introduces possible answers to that question by looking closely at
the development of the thought of Augustine of Hippo, whose complex
spiritual trajectory included Gnosticism, academic skepticism,
pagan Platonism, and orthodox Christianity. What was so compelling
about Christianity and how did Augustine become convinced that his
soul could enter into communion with a transcendent God? The
apparently sudden shift of ancient culture to monotheism and
Christianity was momentous, defining the subsequent nature of
Western religion and thought. John Peter Kenney shows us that
Augustine offers an unusually clear vantage point to understand the
essential ideas that drove that transition.
How can the stories of the Hebrew Bible be read for their ethical
value? Eryl W. Davies uses the narratives of King David in order to
explore this, basing his argument on Martha Nussbaum's notion that
a sensitive and informed commentary can unpack the complexity of
fictional accounts. Davies discusses David and Michal in 1 Sam.
19:11-17; David and Jonathan in 1 Sam. 20; David and Bathsheba in 2
Sam. 11; Nathan's parable in 2 Sam. 12; and the rape of Tamar in 2
Sam. 13. By examining these narratives, Davies shows that a
fruitful and constructive dialogue is possible between biblical
ethics and modern philosophy. He also emphasizes the ethical
accountability of biblical scholars and their responsibility to
evaluate the moral teaching that the biblical narratives have to
offer.
In a bold new argument, Ulrika Carlsson grasps hold of the figure
of Eros that haunts Soren Kierkegaard's The Concept of Irony, and
for the first time, uses it as key to interpret that text and his
second book, Either/Or. According to Carlsson, Kierkegaard adopts
Plato's idea of Eros as the fundamental force that drives humans in
all their pursuits. For him, every existential stance-every way of
living and relating to the outside world-is at heart a way of
loving. By intensely examining Kierkegaard's erotic language, she
also challenges the theory that the philosopher's first two books
have little common ground and reveals that they are in fact
intimately connected by the central and explicit topic of love. In
this text suitable for both students and the Kierkegaard
specialist, Carlsson claims that despite long-held beliefs about
the disparity of his early work, his first two books both relate to
love and Part I of Either/Or should be treated as the sequel to The
Concept of Irony.
The question of whether the existence of evil in the world is
compatible with the existence of an all-knowing, all-powerful,
all-good God has been debated for centuries. Many have addressed
classical arguments from evil, and while recent scholarship in
analytic philosophy of religion has produced newer formulations of
the problem, most of these newer formulations rely on a conception
of God that is not held by all theists. In Bringing Good Even Out
of Evil: Thomism and the Problem of Evil, B. Kyle Keltz defends
classical theism against contemporary problems of evil through the
philosophy of Thomas Aquinas and his interpreters. Keltz discusses
Aquinas's thought on God, evil, and what kind of world God would
make, then turns to contemporary problems of evil and shows how
they miss the mark when it comes to classical theism. Some of the
newer formulations that the book considers include James Sterba's
argument from the Pauline principle, J. L. Schellenberg's divine
hiddenness argument, Stephen Law's evil-god challenge, and Nick
Trakakis's anti-theodicy.
|
|