|
|
Books > Religion & Spirituality > Aspects of religions (non-Christian) > Theology > General
Movement, smell, vision, and other perceptual experiences are ways
of thinking and orienting ourselves in the world. And yet the
appeal to experience as resource for theology, though a significant
shift in contemporary scholarship, has seldom received nuanced
investigation. How do embodied differences like gender, race,
disability, and sexuality highlight theological analysis and
connect to perceptual experience and theological imagination? In
Meaning in Our Bodies, Heike Peckruhn offers historical and
cultural comparisons, showing how sensory experience may order
normalcy, social status, or communal belonging. Ultimately, she
argues that scholars who appeal to the importance of bodily
experiences need to acquire a robust and nuanced understanding of
how sensory perceptions and interactions are cultural and
theological acts of making meaning.
The key question this volume addresses is 'how does Bonhoeffer's
thought help to re(dis)cover the doctrine of Christ's two natures
and one person and understand and renew it in its significance for
a modern post-metaphysical and secular world?' The volume takes a
fresh look at Dietrich Bonhoeffer's Christology and brings it into
a fruitful dialogue with current Christological debates. In a
multi-perspectival, pluralistic world, Bonhoeffer's thinking offers
a productive basis for conceptually incorporating the openness
required for this task into academic theology. Bonhoeffer's
theology offers a starting point for the recovery of a productive
Christology that reflects the plurality of the globalized world, as
Bonhoeffer's Christology begins precisely with this integration
into worldly reality, whereby the world is understood in its
plurality and polyphony. In this way, he characterizes his
enterprise as follows: "What keeps gnawing at me is the question,
what is Christianity, or who is Christ actually for us today" (DBWE
8, 362). Accordingly, it opens itself up not only to
inner-Christian discussion but also to non-Christian worldviews,
from which a basic ethical demand follows.
|
|