|
|
Books > Philosophy
This collection of new essays examines philosophical issues at the
intersection of feminism and autonomy studies. Are autonomy and
independence useful goals for women and subordinate persons? Is
autonomy possible in contexts of social subordination? Is the
pursuit of desires that issue from patriarchal norms consistent
with autonomous agency? How do emotions and caring relate to
autonomous deliberation? Contributors to this collection answer
these questions and others, advancing central debates in autonomy
theory by examining basic components, normative commitments, and
applications of conceptions of autonomy. Several chapters look at
the conditions necessary for autonomous agency and at the role that
values and norms - such as independence, equality, inclusivity,
self-respect, care and femininity - play in feminist theories of
autonomy. Whereas some contributing authors focus on dimensions of
autonomy that are internal to the mind - such as deliberative
reflection, desires, cares, emotions, self-identities and feelings
of self-worth - several authors address social conditions and
practices that support or stifle autonomous agency, often answering
questions of practical import. These include such questions as:
What type of gender socialization best supports autonomous agency
and feminist goals? When does adapting to severely oppressive
circumstances, such as those in human trafficking, turn into a loss
of autonomy? How are ideals of autonomy affected by capitalism? and
How do conceptions of autonomy inform issues in bioethics, such as
end-of-life decisions, or rights to bodily self-determination?
Andy West teaches philosophy in prisons. He has conversations with
people inside about their lives, discusses their ideas and feelings
and listens as the men and women he works with explore new ways to
think about their situation. Could we ever be good if we never felt
shame? What makes a person worthy of forgiveness? Could someone in
prison ever be more free than someone outside? These questions
about how to live are ones we all need to ask, but in this setting
they are even more urgent. When Andy steps into jail, he also
confronts his inherited guilt: his father, uncle and brother all
spent time in prison. He has built a different life for himself,
but he still fears that their fate will be his. As he discusses
questions of truth, identity and hope with his students, he
searches for his own form of freedom. Moving, sympathetic, wise and
frequently funny, The Life Inside is an elegantly written and
unforgettable book. Through its blend of memoir, storytelling and
gentle philosophical questioning, readers will gain a new insight
into our justice system, our prisons and the plurality of lives
found inside.
Is equality valuable? This question dominates many discussions of
social justice, which tend to center on whether certain forms of
distributive equality are valuable, such as the equal distribution
of primary social goods. But these discussions often neglect what
is known as social or relational equality. Social equality suggests
that equality is foremost about relationships and interactions
between people, rather than being primarily about distribution. A
number of philosophers have written about the significance of
social equality, and it has also played an important role in
real-life egalitarian movements, such as feminism and civil rights
movements. However, as it has been relatively neglected in
comparison to the debates about distributive equality, it requires
much more theoretical attention. This volume brings together a
collection of ten original essays which present new analyses of
social and relational equality in philosophy and political theory.
The essays analyze the nature of social equality, as well as its
relationship to justice and politics.
HarperCollins is proud to present its new range of best-loved,
essential classics.`Opportunities multiply as they are
seized.'Written in the 6th century BC, Sun Tzu's The Art of War is
a Chinese military treatise that is still revered today as the
ultimate commentary on war and military strategy. Focussing on the
principle that one can outsmart your foe mentally by thinking very
carefully about strategy before resorting to physical battle, this
philosophy continues to be applied to the corporate and business
world.Sun Tzu's timeless appraisal of the different aspects of
warfare are laid out in 13 chapters, including sections on `Laying
Plans', `Waging War' and `Terrain'. Words that are as resonant
today in every aspect of our lives as they were when he wrote them.
Eli Hirsch has contributed steadily to metaphysics since his
ground-breaking (and much cited) work on identity through time
(culminating in the 1982 OUP book The Concept of Identity). Within
the last 10 years, his work on realism and quantifier variance has
been front-and-center in the minds of many metaphysicians.
Metametaphysics, which looks at foundational questions about the
very practice of metaphysics and the questions it raises, is now a
popular area of discussion. There is a lot of anxiety about what
ontology is, and Hirsch's diagnosis of how revisionary ontologists
go wrong is one of the main views being discussed. This volume
collects HIrsch's essays from the last decade (with the exception
of one article from 1978) on ontology and metametaphysics which are
very much tied to these debates. His essays develop a distinctive
language-based argument against various anti-commonsensical views
that have recently dominated ontology. All these views go astray,
Hirsch says, by failing to interpret ordinary assertions about
existence in a plausibly charitable way, so their philosophizing
leads them to misuse language about ontology -- our ordinary
concept of 'what exists' -- in favor of a position othat is quite
different. Hirsch will supply a new introduction. The volume will
interest philosophers of metaphysics currently engaged in these
debates.
When ordinary people - mathematicians among them - take something
to follow (deductively) from something else, they are exposing the
backbone of our self-ascribed ability to reason. Jody Azzouni
investigates the connection between that ordinary notion of
consequence and the formal analogues invented by logicians. One
claim of the book is that, despite our apparent intuitive grasp of
consequence, we do not introspect rules by which we reason, nor do
we grasp the scope and range of the domain, as it were, of our
reasoning. This point is illustrated with a close analysis of a
paradigmatic case of ordinary reasoning: mathematical proof.
A Treatise of Human Nature was published between 1739 and 1740.
Book I, entitled Of the Understanding, contains Hume's
epistemology, i.e., his account of the manner in which we acquire
knowledge in general, its justification (to the extent that he
thought it could be justified), and its limits. Book II, entitled
Of the Passions, expounds most of what could be called Hume's
philosophy of psychology in general, and his moral psychology
(including discussions of the problem of the freedom of the will
and the rationality of action) in particular. Book III, entitled Of
Morals, is also divided into three parts. Part II of Book III,
entitled Of justice and injustice, is the subject of the present
volume. In it Hume attempts to give an empiricist theory of
justice. He rejects the view, approximated to in varying degrees by
Cumberland, Cudworth, Locke, Clarke, Wollaston, and Butler, that
justice is something natural and part of the nature of things, and
that its edicts are eternal and immutable, and discernible by
reason. Hume maintains, on the contrary, as did Hobbes and
Mandeville, that justice is a matter of observing rules or
conventions which are of human invention, and that, in consequence,
our acquiring a knowledge of justice is an empirical affair of
ascertaining what these rules or conventions are.
What is consciousness? How does the subjective character of
consciousness fit into an objective world? How can there be a
science of consciousness? In this sequel to his groundbreaking and
controversial The Conscious Mind, David Chalmers develops a unified
framework that addresses these questions and many others. Starting
with a statement of the "hard problem" of consciousness, Chalmers
builds a positive framework for the science of consciousness and a
nonreductive vision of the metaphysics of consciousness. He replies
to many critics of The Conscious Mind, and then develops a positive
theory in new directions. The book includes original accounts of
how we think and know about consciousness, of the unity of
consciousness, and of how consciousness relates to the external
world. Along the way, Chalmers develops many provocative ideas: the
"consciousness meter", the Garden of Eden as a model of perceptual
experience, and The Matrix as a guide to the deepest philosophical
problems about consciousness and the external world. This book will
be required reading for anyone interested in the problems of mind,
brain, consciousness, and reality.
The fifteen new essays collected in this volume address questions
concerning the ethics of self-defense, most centrally when and to
what extent the use of defensive force, especially lethal force,
can be justified. Scholarly interest in this topic reflects public
concern stemming from controversial cases of the use of force by
police, and military force exercised in the name of defending
against transnational terrorism. The contributors pay special
attention to determining when a threat is liable to defensive harm,
though doubts about this emphasis are also raised. The legitimacy
of so-called "stand your ground" policies and laws is also
addressed. This volume will be of great interest to readers in
moral, political, and legal philosophy.
In this volume, Kieran McGroarty provides a philosophical
commentary on a section of the Enneads written by the last great
Neoplatonist thinker, Plotinus. The treatise is entitled
"Concerning Well-Being" and was written at a late stage in
Plotinus' life when he was suffering from an illness that was
shortly to kill him. Its main concern is with the good man and how
he should pursue the good life. The treatise is therefore central
to our understanding of Plotinus' ethical theory, and the
commentary seeks to explicate and elucidate that theory. Plotinus'
views on how one should live in order to fulfill oneself as a human
being are as relevant now as they were in the third century AD. All
Greek and Latin is translated, while short summaries introducing
the content of each chapter help to make Plotinus' argument clear
even to the non-specialist.
|
|