For the purposes of efficiently and effectively assuring allies and
deterring adversaries in Europe and on the Korean Peninsula, the
Army s force posture is out of balance today, with insufficient
units and Soldiers stationed overseas. Since the end of the Cold
War during which hundreds of thousands of Soldiers were stationed
overseas the pendulum has swung too far in the direction of a
U.S.-stationed Army, yielding an over-reliance on rotational
deployments for continuous heel-to-toe presence to achieve
deterrence and assurance effectively and at reasonable, sustainable
cost. The preceding assessment is the result of a 10-month study
examining the costs and benefits defined broadly of rotational
deployments versus forward stationing. Not all of the available
quantitative and qualitative data point in the same direction.
There are indeed a myriad of sometimes conflicting costs and
benefits that must be considered in determining whether and how
U.S. Army posture has become unbalanced and what to do about it.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!