0
Your cart

Your cart is empty

Books > Language & Literature > Language & linguistics

Buy Now

I'm Sorry for What I've Done - The Language of Courtroom Apologies (Hardcover) Loot Price: R2,497
Discovery Miles 24 970
I'm Sorry for What I've Done - The Language of Courtroom Apologies (Hardcover): M Catherine Gruber

I'm Sorry for What I've Done - The Language of Courtroom Apologies (Hardcover)

M Catherine Gruber

Series: Oxford Studies in Language and Law

 (sign in to rate)
Loot Price R2,497 Discovery Miles 24 970 | Repayment Terms: R234 pm x 12*

Bookmark and Share

Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days

This book examines 52 apologetic allocutions produced during federal sentencing hearings. The practice of inviting defendants to make a statement in their own behalf is a long-standing one and it is understood as offering defendants the opportunity to impress a judge or jury with their remorse, which could be a factor in the sentence that is imposed. Defendants raised the topics of the offense, mitigation, future behaviour and the sentence in different ways and this book explores the pros and cons associated with the different strategies that they used. Because there is no way of ascertaining exactly how effective (or ineffective) an individual allocution is, case law, sociolinguistic and historical resources, and judges' final remarks are used to develop hypotheses about defendants' communicative goals as well as what might constitute an ideal defendant stance from a judge's point of view. The corpus is unique because, unlike official transcripts, the transcripts used for this study include paralinguistic features such as hesitations, wavering voice, and crying-while-talking. Among its highlights, the book proposes that although a ritualized apology formula (e.g., "I'm sorry " or "I apologize ") would appear to be a good fit for the context of allocution and even appears to be expected, the use of these formulas carries implications in this context that do not serve defendants' communicative goals. I argue that the application of Austin's (1962) performative-constative continuum reveals that offense-related utterances that fall closer to the constative end are more consistent with the discursive constraints on the speech event of allocution. Further, I propose that the ideologies associated with allocution, in particular the belief that allocution functions as a protection for defendants, obscures the ways in which the context constrains what defendants can say and how effectively they can say it.

General

Imprint: Oxford UniversityPress
Country of origin: United States
Series: Oxford Studies in Language and Law
Release date: May 2014
First published: May 2014
Authors: M Catherine Gruber (PhD in Linguistics)
Dimensions: 241 x 162 x 25mm (L x W x T)
Format: Hardcover
Pages: 256
ISBN-13: 978-0-19-932566-5
Categories: Books > Law > General
Books > Language & Literature > Language & linguistics > General
Books > Social sciences > Psychology > General
Books > Social sciences > Sociology, social studies > Social institutions > General
LSN: 0-19-932566-9
Barcode: 9780199325665

Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate? Let us know about it.

Does this product have an incorrect or missing image? Send us a new image.

Is this product missing categories? Add more categories.

Review This Product

No reviews yet - be the first to create one!

Partners