While ancient civilizations worshipped strong, active emotions,
modern societies have favored more peaceful attitudes, especially
within the democratic process. We have largely forgotten the
struggle to make use of "thymos," the part of the soul that,
following Plato, contains spirit, pride, and indignation. Rather,
Christianity and psychoanalysis have promoted mutual understanding
to overcome conflict. Through unique examples, Peter Sloterdijk,
the preeminent posthumanist, argues exactly the opposite, showing
how the history of Western civilization can be read as a
suppression and return of rage.
By way of reinterpreting the "Iliad," Alexandre Dumas's "Count
of Monte Cristo," and recent Islamic political riots in Paris,
Sloterdijk proves the fallacy that rage is an emotion capable of
control. Global terrorism and economic frustrations have rendered
strong emotions visibly resurgent, and the consequences of violent
outbursts will determine international relations for decades to
come. To better respond to rage and its complexity, Sloterdijk
daringly breaks with entrenched dogma and contructs a new theory
for confronting conflict. His approach acknowledges and respects
the proper place of rage and channels it into productive political
struggle.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!