|
Books > Humanities > History > American history > 1800 to 1900
Released to mark the 150th anniversary of one of the bloodiest
battles of the Civil War, this book provides general readers with a
succinct examination of the Confederacy's last major triumph. There
is renewed interest among Civil War historians and history buffs
alike about events west of the Appalachian Mountains and their
impact on the outcome of the conflict. In examining the Chickamauga
campaign, this book provides a fresh analysis of the foremost
Confederate victory in the Western theater. The study opens with a
discussion of two commanders, William S. Rosecrans and Braxton
Bragg, and the forces swirling around them when they clashed in
September 1863. Drawing on both primary sources and recent Civil
War scholarship, it then follows the specific aspects of the
battle, day by day. In addition to interweaving analysis of the
Union and Confederate commanders and the tactical situation during
the campaign, the book also reveals how the rank and file dealt
with the changing fortunes of war. Readers will see how the
campaign altered the high commands of both armies, how it impacted
the common soldier, and how it affected the strategic situation,
North and South.
Revered in his lifetime, Robert E. Lee achieved legendary status
after his death. This memoir by Lee's son gathers a wealth of
material written by the General, offering rare glimpses of the man
behind the uniform, with scenes from family life and touching
letters from a loving husband and father.
The American Civil War is filled with fascinating characters. This
collection of biographical essays on the "winners and losers" of
the Civil War covers some of the most intriguing: Ulysses S. Grant,
George B. McClellan, Sam Houston, Albert Sidney Johnston, Nathan
Bedford Forrest, and William Clarke Quantrill, to name just a few.
In Articles of War you'll discover: Some Winners *Ulysses S. Grant,
whose brilliant Vicksburg Campaign was a model of military strategy
*John A. "Black Jack" Logan, one of the war's few successful
political generals *Nathan Bedford Forrest, a natural military
genius despite his "Lost Cause" Some Losers *George B. McClellan,
whose lack of eagerness cost the Union two opportunities to win the
war *Earl Van Dorn, a victim of sheer bad luck *Theophilus H.
Holmes, the little-known incompetent, called "granny Holmes" by his
own men Some Winners Who Became Losers *Albert Sidney Johnston, the
Confederacy's "General Who Might Have Been" *Leonidas Polk, whose
initial good luck even
During the Civil War, cities, houses, forests, and soldiers' bodies
were transformed into ""dead heaps of ruins,"" novel sights in the
southern landscape. How did this happen, and why? And what did
Americans-northern and southern, black and white, male and
female-make of this proliferation of ruins? Ruin Nation is the
first book to bring together environmental and cultural histories
to consider the evocative power of ruination as an imagined state,
an act of destruction, and a process of change. Megan Kate Nelson
examines the narratives and images that Americans produced as they
confronted the war's destructiveness. Architectural ruins-cities
and houses-dominated the stories that soldiers and civilians told
about the ""savage"" behaviour of men and the invasions of domestic
privacy. The ruins of living things-trees and bodies-also provoked
discussion and debate. People who witnessed forests and men being
blown apart were plagued by anxieties about the impact of wartime
technologies on nature and on individual identities. The
obliteration of cities, houses, trees, and men was a shared
experience. Nelson shows that this is one of the ironies of the
war's ruination-in a time of the most extreme national divisiveness
people found common ground as they considered the war's costs. And
yet, very few of these ruins still exist, suggesting that the
destructive practices that dominated the experiences of Americans
during the Civil War have been erased from our national
consciousness.
The 57th Virginia Infantry was one of five regiments in General
Lewis Armistead's Brigade in Pickett's Charge, at the Battle of
Gettysburg on July 3, 1863. Prior to being Brigadier General,
Armistead commanded the 57th Virginia. About 1,800 men joined the
57th, primarily from Franklin, Pittsylvania, Buckingham, Botetourt,
and Albemarle County, but at least 15 bordering counties
contributed men. Initial enlistments were from May-July of 1861,
with the nucleus coming from 5 companies of Keen's Battalion. This
publication gives detail on the battles, from Malvern Hill to
Appomattox, and the prison camps many suffered through. The core of
the book, however, is a quest for basic genealogical data on the
men of the 57th Virginia, with a focus on their parents, wives, and
location in 1860.
What really happened at Fort Pillow on April 12, 1864? The Union
called it a massacre. The Confederacy called it necessity.
TheTennessee spring came early that year, "awakening regional
plants as warmer air and mois soil nurtured new life. Across the
landscape could be seen the faint hint of green as sweet gum,
hickory, oak cottonwood,...Sweet Williams, and wild dogwood added
their hues." This serene backdrop in hardly the place where one
would imagine such a one-sided military atrocity to take place.
Although at first glance the numbers are hardly noteworthy, the
casualty ratio speaks volumes on the event. Eyewitness accounts
relate "vivid recollection" of the numerous and specific nature of
the injuries suffered by the survivors." Controversy and scandal
surround the Southern general Nathan Bedford Forrest. Why did it
seem that he passively watched his men attack and mutilate more
than one hundred apparently unarmed soldiers? Perhaps the biggest
controversy involved racial prejudice. Was there a reason
The Indian War of 1864 chronicles one of the bloodiest conflicts
between the European settlers and military forces of the United
States, and the Native American tribes. A shocking account of the
bloodshed and damage wrought as white settlers moved relentlessly
westward during the 19th century, this book lays bare the scale of
the conflicts with the Native Americans. Furthermore it is
authentic: a first-hand, somewhat biographical recollection of the
conflict penned by a young American cavalryman posted to the
Western frontier with the mission of securing it for settlers. The
conflicts took place simultaneously with the American Civil War,
and it was thus that rumors of the Confederacy joining with the
Native American tribes in hindering the expansion of the United
States are present. Despite its title, this book is not entirely
about the skirmishes fought: it includes descriptions of the land,
the fledgling frontier society of the 'Wild West' era, and members
of the native tribes.
The sesquicentennial of the American Civil War presents a unique
opportunity to consider the motivation behind General Robert E. Lee
s efforts to defend the Confederacy against his once beloved United
States. What will be learned from this book is that General Lee was
following in the footsteps of his idol General George Washington.
General Lee was not fighting to perpetuate and expand slavery,
self-aggrandizement, or military glory. He was fighting for the
1776 principles of government based upon the consent of the
governed, the 1789 principles of the rule of law, and for a
Judeo-Christian based civilization. While Lee s military genius and
commitment to duty are widely acknowledged, his political acumen
is, for the most part, underrated. Master of the art of politics as
much as war, which is politics by other means, Lee considered both
normative arts concerned with the happiness and noble actions of
the citizens. In fact, Lee s successes and failures on the
battlefield were due in large measure to his worldview that if the
Confederacy were to survive its citizenry must act nobly. According
to Lee, it is in noble actions that human happiness is to be
achieved. For Lee, the soldier and citizen performing their
respective duties were on the paths to individual happiness and,
ultimately, a free and independent CSA. In The Enduring Relevance
of Robert E. Lee Marshall L. DeRosa uses the American Civil War and
the figure of Robert E. Lee to consider the role of political
leadership under extremely difficult circumstances and the proper
response to those circumstances. DeRosa examines Lee as a
politician rather than just a military leader and finds that many
of Lee s assertions are still relevant today. DeRosa reveals Lee s
insights and his awareness that the victory of the Union over the
Confederacy placed America on the path towards the demise of
government based upon the consent of the governed, the rule of law,
and the Judeo-Christian American civilization."
War was no stranger to the town of Sudbury, Massachusetts. A small
farming community at the outbreak of the Civil War, Sudbury stood
ready to support the cause of the Union. Uriah and Mary Moore, a
local farmer and his wife, parents of ten children, sent four sons
off to fight for the Union. George Frederick Moore was twenty years
old when he joined the Thirty-fifth Massachusetts Regiment in 1862,
along with brother, Albert. Their brother, John, had enlisted in
the Thirteenth Massachusetts Regiment and had been serving since
1861. In 1864, a fourth brother, Alfred, joined the Fifty-ninth
Massachusetts Regiment. The eighty-four letters in this collection
span the years from August 1862 to the end of the War and include
correspondence to and from Pvt. George Moore and five family
members. George's personal diaries from 1863 and 1864 are also
included, as well as the 1867 diary of Sarah Jones, the girl he
married. Through research the family is traced long after the war,
revealing their travels and accomplishments. Explanatory passages
that accompany these letters highlight the campaigns of the
Thirty-fifth Massachusetts through the war years. George Moore took
part in battles from South Mountain and Antietam to Fredericksburg,
Vicksburg, Campbell's Station, and the Siege of Knoxville. He
participated in the Battles of the Wilderness, Cold Harbor, and the
assault on Petersburg. The letters to and from George Moore and his
loved ones provide an intimate glimpse of the trials, not only of
the soldiers, but of the family who sent their boys off to war.
|
|