|
Books > Social sciences > Sociology, social studies > Social institutions > Death & dying
Suppose you knew that, though you yourself would live your life to
its natural end, the earth and all its inhabitants would be
destroyed thirty days after your death. To what extent would you
remain committed to your current projects and plans? Would
scientists still search for a cure for cancer? Would couples still
want children? In Death and the Afterlife, philosopher Samuel
Scheffler poses this thought experiment in order to show that the
continued life of the human race after our deaths-the "afterlife"
of the title-matters to us to an astonishing and previously
neglected degree. Indeed, Scheffler shows that, in certain
important respects, the future existence of people who are as yet
unborn matters more to us than our own continued existence and the
continued existence of those we love. Without the expectation that
humanity has a future, many of the things that now matter to us
would cease to do so. By contrast, the prospect of our own deaths
does little to undermine our confidence in the value of our
activities. Despite the terror we may feel when contemplating our
deaths, the prospect of humanity's imminent extinction would pose a
far greater threat to our ability to lead lives of wholehearted
engagement. Scheffler further demonstrates that, although we are
not unreasonable to fear death, personal immortality, like the
imminent extinction of humanity, would also undermine our
confidence in the values we hold dear. His arresting conclusion is
that, in order for us to lead value-laden lives, what is necessary
is that we ourselves should die and that others should live. Death
and the Afterlife concludes with commentary by four distinguished
philosophers-Harry Frankfurt, Niko Kolodny, Seana Shiffrin, and
Susan Wolf-who discuss Scheffler's ideas with insight and
imagination. Scheffler adds a final reply.
"Kein Antlitz in einem Sarg hat mir je gezeigt, daB der
Eben-Verstorbene uns vermiBt. Das Gegenteil davon ist Uberdeutlich
. . . Der Verstorbene UberlaBt mich der Erinnerung an meine
Erlebnisse mit ihm . . . Er hingegen, der Verstorbene, hat
inzwischen eine Erfahrung, die mir erst noch bevorsteht, und die
sich nicht ver- mitteln laBt - es geschehe denn durch eine
Offenbarung im Glauben. " Aus der Totenrede von Max Frisch fUr
Peter Noll Die Ergebnisse einer kulturvergleichenden Analyse zu
Sterben und Tod, die sich die 7. Internationale Fachkonferenz
Ethnomedizin im April 1984 zur Aufgabe gemacht hatte, werden hier
einer breiteren Offentlichkeit zuganglich. Die Beitrage
konfrontieren uns mit einer tiberwaltigenden Ftille kultureller
Zeugnisse tiber den Umgang mit Sterbenden und tiber die
Symbolisierung des Todes. Ungeachtet der un- vermeidlichen
Beschranktheit und Zufalligkeit der Auswahl, trotz der in der Sache
liegenden Verfremdung wissenschaftlich-methodischer Dar- stellung
ftihlt sich der Leser unmittelbar angesprochen, ja, gefes- selt
durch die Intensitat, mit der zu allen Zeiten und in allen Kulturen
Sterben und Tod kulturell gestaltet, symbolisch gedeutet und im
mitmenschlichen Umgang erfahren wurde. DaB uns Menschen Ster- ben
und Tod gemeinsam sind, daB jede Zeit, jede Kultur, aber auch jeder
einzelne sich dieser anthropologisch gemeinsamen Situation stellen
muB, sie ftir sich deuten und verarbeiten muB, dtirfte wohl auf
keine andere Weise so sinnfallig und tiberzeugend hervortreten wie
in dem hier vorgelegten Tagungsbericht.
In this exploration of how people lived and died in eighteenth- and
nineteenth- century New Mexico, Martina Will de Chaparro weaves
together the stories of individuals and communities in this
cultural crossroads of the American Southwest. The wills and burial
registers at the heart of this study provide insights into the
variety of ways in which death was understood by New Mexicans
living in a period of profound social and political transitions.
This volume addresses the model of the good death that settlers and
friars brought with them to New Mexico, challenges to the model's
application, and the eventual erosion of the ideal. The text also
considers the effects of public-health legislation that sought to
protect the public welfare, as well as responses to these
controversial and unpopular reforms. Will de Chaparro discusses
both cultural continuity and regional adaptation, examining
Spanish-American deathways in New Mexico during the colonial
(approximately 1700-1821), Mexican (1821-1848), and early
Territorial (1848-1880) periods.
What is suicide? When does suicide start and when does it end? Who
is involved? Examining narratives of suicide through a discourse
analytic framework, Discursive Constructions of the Suicidal
Process demonstrates how linguistic theories and methodologies can
help answer these questions and cast light upon what suicide
involves and means, both for those who commit an act and their
loved ones. Engaging in close analysis of suicide letters written
before the act and post-hoc narratives from after the event, this
book is the first qualitative study to view suicide not as a single
event outside time, but as a time-extended process. Exploring how
suicide is experienced and narrated from two temporal perspectives,
Dariusz Galasinski and Justyna Ziolkowska introduce discourse
analysis to the field of suicidology. Arguing that studying suicide
narratives and the reality they represent can add significantly to
our understanding of the process, and in particular its experiences
and meanings, Discursive Constructions of the Suicidal Process
demonstrates the value of discourse analytic insights in informing,
enriching and contextualising our knowledge of suicide.
The global doubling of human life expectancy between 1850 and 1950
is arguably one of the most consequential developments in human
history, undergirding massive improvements in human life and
lifestyles. In 1850, Americans died at an average age of 30. Today,
the average is almost 80. This story is typically told as a series
of medical breakthroughs Jenner and vaccination, Lister and
antisepsis, Snow and germ theory, Fleming and penicillin, but the
lion's share of the credit belongs to the men and women who
dedicated their lives to collecting good data. Examining the
development of death registration systems in the United States-from
the first mortality census in 1850 to the development of the death
certificate at the turn of the century-Count the Dead argues that
mortality data transformed life on Earth, proving critical to the
systemization of public health, casualty reporting, and human
rights. Stephen Berry shows how a network of coroners, court
officials, and state and federal authorities developed methods to
track and reveal patterns of dying. These officials harnessed these
records to turn the collective dead into informants and in so doing
allowed the dead to shape life and death as we know it today.
The global doubling of human life expectancy between 1850 and 1950
is arguably one of the most consequential developments in human
history, undergirding massive improvements in human life and
lifestyles. In 1850, Americans died at an average age of 30. Today,
the average is almost 80. This story is typically told as a series
of medical breakthroughs Jenner and vaccination, Lister and
antisepsis, Snow and germ theory, Fleming and penicillin, but the
lion's share of the credit belongs to the men and women who
dedicated their lives to collecting good data. Examining the
development of death registration systems in the United States-from
the first mortality census in 1850 to the development of the death
certificate at the turn of the century-Count the Dead argues that
mortality data transformed life on Earth, proving critical to the
systemization of public health, casualty reporting, and human
rights. Stephen Berry shows how a network of coroners, court
officials, and state and federal authorities developed methods to
track and reveal patterns of dying. These officials harnessed these
records to turn the collective dead into informants and in so doing
allowed the dead to shape life and death as we know it today.
The New Death brings together scholars who are intrigued by today's
rapidly changing death practices and attitudes. New and different
ways of treating the body and memorializing the dead are
proliferating across global cities. Using ethnographic, historical,
and media-based approaches, the contributors to this volume focus
on new attitudes and practices around mortality and mourning--from
the possibilities of digitally enhanced afterlives to
industrialized "necro-waste," the ethics of care, the meaning of
secular rituals, and the political economy of death. Together, the
chapters coalesce around the argument that there are two major
currents running through the new death--reconfigurations of
temporality and of intimacy. Pushing back against the
folklorization endemic to anthropological studies of death
practices and the whiteness of death studies as a field, the
chapters strive to override divisions between the Global South and
the Anglophone world, focusing instead on syncretization,
globalization, and magic within the mundane.
This illuminating book examines how the public funerals of major
figures from the Civil War era shaped public memories of the war
and allowed a diverse set of people to contribute to changing
American national identities. These funerals featured lengthy
processions that sometimes crossed multiple state lines, burial
ceremonies open to the public, and other cultural productions of
commemoration such as oration and song. As Sarah J. Purcell
reveals, Americans' participation in these funeral rites led to
contemplation and contestation over the political and social
meanings of the war and the roles played by the honored dead.
Public mourning for military heroes, reformers, and politicians
distilled political and social anxieties as the country coped with
the aftermath of mass death and casualties. Purcell shows how
large-scale funerals for figures such as Henry Clay and Thomas J.
"Stonewall" Jackson set patterns for mourning culture and Civil War
commemoration; after 1865, public funerals for figures such as
Robert E. Lee, Charles Sumner, Frederick Douglass, and Winnie Davis
elaborated on these patterns and fostered public debate about the
meanings of the war, Reconstruction, race, and gender.
|
|