|
|
Books > Earth & environment > Geography > Physical geography > Forests, rainforests
For a sustainable urban future to be possible, a new botanical
discipline is needed to deepen our understanding of the relations
between people and plants. This discipline will link environmental
management concerns with those of human welfare and wellbeing in a
specifically urban context to achieve both ecological restorations
and social redress. The Durban Botanic Gardens Trust has published
The Durban Forest as an early effort to establish a manifesto for
this much-needed new discipline, and provides both historical and
forward-looking perspectives on the changing relations between
natural areas and urban dwellers. These relations urgently await
our exploration if we are to face the challenges of the
accelerating urbanism and environmental change that are now upon
us. The Durban forest will appeal to all those interested in people
and the environment, culture and community, our past and our
future. Most of all, it will speak to the Durban of tomorrow and
suggest a new kind of botany that will help to build a future for
all Durban’s residents that is environmentally, socially and
economically more just and more secure. The Durban forest is the
first in a series of publications planned by the Durban Botanic
Gardens Trust. The series is to be entitled umKhuhlu, the African
name for Trichilia dregeana, the forest mahogany and an iconic
Durban tree. The series will draw on the garden’s reputation as
Durban’s oldest, and one of its most treasured public institutions
in order to encourage a new model of plant use. This model aspires
to a specific urban, humanitarian and restorative focus that will
support a just and resilient urbanism.
Following the 1917 Mexican Revolution inhabitants of the states of
Chihuahua and Michoacan received vast tracts of prime timberland as
part of Mexico's land redistribution program. Although locals
gained possession of the forests, the federal government retained
management rights, which created conflict over subsequent decades
among rural, often indigenous villages; government; and private
timber companies about how best to manage the forests. Christopher
R. Boyer examines this history in Political Landscapes, where he
argues that the forests in Chihuahua and Michoacan became what he
calls "political landscapes"-that is, geographies that become
politicized by the interactions between opposing actors-through the
effects of backroom deals, nepotism, and political negotiations.
Understanding the historical dynamic of community forestry in
Mexico is particularly critical for those interested in promoting
community involvement in the use and conservation of forestlands
around the world. Considering how rural and indigenous people have
confronted, accepted, and modified the rationalizing projects of
forest management foisted on them by a developmentalist state is
crucial before community management is implemented elsewhere.
Following the 1917 Mexican Revolution inhabitants of the states of
Chihuahua and Michoacan received vast tracts of prime timberland as
part of Mexico's land redistribution program. Although locals
gained possession of the forests, the federal government retained
management rights, which created conflict over subsequent decades
among rural, often indigenous villages; government; and private
timber companies about how best to manage the forests. Christopher
R. Boyer examines this history in Political Landscapes, where he
argues that the forests in Chihuahua and Michoacan became what he
calls "political landscapes"-that is, geographies that become
politicized by the interactions between opposing actors-through the
effects of backroom deals, nepotism, and political negotiations.
Understanding the historical dynamic of community forestry in
Mexico is particularly critical for those interested in promoting
community involvement in the use and conservation of forestlands
around the world. Considering how rural and indigenous people have
confronted, accepted, and modified the rationalizing projects of
forest management foisted on them by a developmentalist state is
crucial before community management is implemented elsewhere.
|
|