|
|
Books > Humanities > History > American history > From 1900
The southernmost region of the Republic of Vietnam (South Vietnam)
encompassed the vast Mekong River Delta, and area covering 10,190
square miles. Three major rivers run through the Delta, the Song
Hou Giang (aka Bassac) and the Song Mekong, which broke into three
large rivers (Song My Tho, Ham Luong, and Go Chien). The Nhon Trach
delineated the Delta's eastern edge. In all there were some 1,500
miles of natural navigable waterways and 2,500 miles of man-made
canals and channels. The canal system was begun in 800 AD and its
expansion continued up to World War II. The nation's capital,
Saigon, lies on the Delta's northern edge. Few roads and highways
served the region with sampans and other small watercraft via the
canals being the main means of transportation.
At least 70,000 Viet Cong (VC) were scattered over the area
controlling up to a quarter of the population. Three Army of the
Republic Vietnam (ARVN) divisions as well as various paramilitary
forces battled the VC in the marshes, forests, and paddies. In 1965
the military situation in the Delta had deteriorated and the
decision was taken to shore things up by committing a joint Army
and Navy Mobile Riverine Force. This force was unique in its
composition, mission, and the special craft in which it operated.
The Army component was the 2d Brigade, 9th Infantry Division; the
Navy component was River Assault Flotilla One. The various
watercraft assigned to the Mobile Riverine Force are the subject of
this book. These included much-modified landing craft,
purpose-built patrol boats including Swift Boats and Monitors, and
a variety of auxiliary and support vessels. Task Force CLEARWATER,
a much smaller operation in the extremenorthern portion of South
Vietnam, also used these craft.
By the autumn of 1971 a war-weary American public had endured a
steady stream of bad news about the conduct of its soldiers in
Vietnam. It included reports of fraggings, massacres, and
cover-ups, mutinies, increased racial tensions, and soaring drug
abuse. Then six soldiers at Fire Support Base Pace, a besieged U.S.
artillery outpost near the Cambodian border, balked at an order to
conduct a nighttime ambush patrol. Four days later, twenty soldiers
from a second unit objected to patrolling even in daylight. The
sensation these events triggered in the media, along with calls for
a congressional investigation, reinforced for the American public
the image of a dysfunctional military on the edge of collapse. For
a time Pace became the face of all that was wrong with American
troops during the extended withdrawal from Vietnam. William
Shkurti, however, argues that the incidents at Firebase Pace have
been misunderstood for four decades. Shkurti, who served as an
artillery officer not far from Pace, uses declassified reports,
first-person interviews, and other sources to reveal that these
incidents were only temporary disputes involving veteran soldiers
exercising common sense. Shkurti also uses the Pace incidents to
bring an entire war and our withdrawal from it into much sharper
focus. He reevaluates the performance and motivation of U.S. ground
troops and their commanders during this period, as well as that of
their South Vietnamese allies and North Vietnamese adversaries;
reassesses the media and its coverage of this phase of the war; and
shows how some historians have helped foster misguided notions
about what actually happened at Pace. By taking a closer look at
what we thought we knew, Shkurti persuasively demonstrates how
combat units still in harm's way adapted to the challenges before
them and soldiered on in a war everyone else wanted to be over. In
doing so, he also suggests a context to better understand the
challenges that may lie ahead in the drawdown of troops from Iraq
and Afghanistan.
An army, Lewis Mumford once observed, "is a body of pure
consumers"-and it is logistics that feeds this body's insatiable
appetite for men and materiel. Successful logistics-the
transportation of supplies and combatants to battle-cannot
guarantee victory, but poor logistics portends defeat. In Feeding
Victory, Jobie Turner asks how technical innovation has affected
this connection over time and whether advances in technology, from
the railroad and the airplane to the nuclear weapon and the
computer, have altered both the critical relationship between
logistics and warfare and, ultimately, geopolitical
dynamics.Covering a span of three hundred years, Feeding Victory
focuses on five distinct periods of technological change, from the
preindustrial era to the information age. For each era Turner
presents a case study: the campaign for Lake George from 1755 to
1759, the Western Front in 1917, the Battle of Guadalcanal in 1942,
the Battle of Stalingrad from 1942 to 1943, and the Battle of Khe
Sanh in 1968. In each of these cases the logistics of the
belligerents were at their limit because of geography or the vast
material needs of war. With such limits, the case studies both give
a clear accounting of the logistics of the period, particularly
with respect to the mode of transportation-whether air, land, or
sea-and reveal the inflection points between success and failure.
What are the continuities between eras, Turner asks, and what can
these campaigns tell us about the relationship of technology to
logistics and logistics to geopolitics? In doing so, Turner
discovers just how critical the biological needs of the soldiers on
the battlefield prove to be; in fact, they overwhelm firepower in
their importance, even in the modern era. His work shows how
logistics aptly represents technological shifts from the
enlightenment to the dawn of the twentyfirst century and how, in
our time, ideas have come to trump the material forces of war.
|
|