|
|
Books > History > Asian / Middle Eastern history > From 1900
General Creighton Abrams has been called the greatest American
general since Ulysses S. Grant, yet at the time this book was first
published in 1992, he was little known by most Americans. For more
than four decades, in three wars and in challenging peacetime
assignments, Abrams demonstrated the skill, courage, integrity, and
compassion that made him a legend in his profession. Thunderbolt is
the definitive biography of the man who commanded U.S. forces in
Vietnam during the withdrawal stage and for whom the army's main
battle tank is named. With a new introduction by the author, this
edition places the complex and sophisticated Abrams and his many
achievements in the context of the army he served and ultimately
led, and of the national and international events in which he
played a vital role. Thunderbolt is a stirring portrait of the
quintessential soldier and of the transformation of the U.S. Army
from the horse brigades of the 1930s to the high-tech military
force of today.
In June 2011, the hallways of the district government center in
rural Dand District, Afghanistan hummed with activity, with scores
of local village elders visiting offices to appeal for assistance
and handouts. Outside, insurgents had been pushed out of the
district and were confined to sporadic attacks along its fringes.
Farmers sold their produce, thousands of children attended school
and people voted in district elections. At the very heart of the
Taliban insurgency, the government had won the war. However, the
district faced a crisis that threatened its future. Resources were
shrinking and the new government had concerns about remaining
relevant to the people once America left. Within 12 months,
Americans pulled out of Afghanistan, leaving the Afghan government
to fail, undermining the achievements of thousands of soldiers and
civilians. How We Won and Lost the War in Afghanistan: Two Years in
the Pashtun Homeland by Douglas Grindle tells the never-been-told,
first person account of how the war in Afghanistan was won, and how
the newly created peace started to slip away when vital resources
failed to materialize and the American military headed home. By
placing the reader at the heart of the American counter-insurgency
effort, Grindle reveals little-known incidents that include the
failure of expensive aid programs to target local needs, the slow
throttling of local government as official funds failed to reach
the districts, and our inexplicable failure to empower the Afghan
local officials even after they succeeded in bringing the people
onto their side. How We Won and Lost the War in Afghanistan
presents the side of the hard-working, competent Afghans who won
the war and what they really thought of the U.S. military and their
decisions. Written by a former field officer for the U.S. Agency
for International Development, this book tells of how America's
desire to leave the Middle East ultimately overwhelmed our need to
sustain victory.
 |
The Iraq Papers
(Paperback)
John Ehrenberg, J. Patrice McSherry, Jose Ramon Sanchez, Caroleen Marji Sayej
|
R746
R680
Discovery Miles 6 800
Save R66 (9%)
|
Ships in 18 - 22 working days
|
|
|
No foreign policy decision in recent history has had greater
repercussions than President George W. Bush's decision to invade
and occupy Iraq. It launched a new doctrine of preemptive war,
mired the American military in an intractable armed conflict,
disrupted world petroleum supplies, cost the United States hundreds
of billions of dollars, and damaged or ended the lives of hundreds
of thousands of Americans and Iraqis. Its impact on international
politics and America's standing in the world remains incalculable.
The Iraq Papers offers a compelling documentary narrative and
interpretation of this momentous conflict. With keen editing and
incisive commentary, the book weaves together original documents
that range from presidential addresses to redacted memos, carrying
us from the ideology behind the invasion to negotiations for
withdrawal. These papers trace the rise of the neoconservatives and
reveal the role of strategic thinking about oil supplies. In moving
to the planning for the war itself, the authors not only provide
Congressional resolutions and speeches by President Bush, but
internal security papers, Pentagon planning documents, the report
of the Future of Iraq Project, and eloquent opposition statements
by Senator Robert Byrd, other world governments, the Non-Aligned
Movement, and the World Council of Churches. This collection
addresses every aspect of the conflict, from the military's
evolving counterinsurgency strategy to declarations by Iraqi
resisters and political figures-from Coalition Provisional
Authority orders to Donald Rumsfeld's dismissal of the insurgents
as "dead-enders" and Iraqi discussions of state- and nationbuilding
under the shadow of occupation. The economics of petroleum, the
legal and ethical questions surrounding terrorism and torture,
international agreements, the theory of the "unitary presidency,"
and the Bush administration's use of presidential signing
statements all receive in-depth coverage.
The Iraq War has reshaped the domestic and international landscape.
The Iraq Papers offers the authoritative one-volume source for
understanding the conflict and its many repercussions.
How presidents spark and sustain support for wars remains an
enduring and significant problem. Korea was the first limited war
the U.S. experienced in the contemporary period - the first recent
war fought for something less than total victory. In Selling the
Korean War, Steven Casey explores how President Truman and then
Eisenhower tried to sell it to the American public.
Based on a massive array of primary sources, Casey subtly explores
the government's selling activities from all angles. He looks at
the halting and sometimes chaotic efforts of Harry Truman and Dean
Acheson, Dwight Eisenhower and John Foster Dulles. He examines the
relationships that they and their subordinates developed with a
host of other institutions, from Congress and the press to
Hollywood and labor. And he assesses the complex and fraught
interactions between the military and war correspondents in the
battlefield theater itself.
From high politics to bitter media spats, Casey guides the reader
through the domestic debates of this messy, costly war. He
highlights the actions and calculations of colorful figures,
including Senators Robert Taft and JHoseph McCarthy, and General
Douglas MacArthur. He details how the culture and work routines of
Congress and the media influenced political tactics and daily news
stories. And he explores how different phases of the war threw up
different problems - from the initial disasters in the summer of
1950 to the giddy prospects of victory in October 1950, from the
massive defeats in the wake of China's massive intervention to the
lengthy period of stalemate fighting in 1952 and 1953.
The American war in Vietnam was concluded in 1973 under the terms
of a truce that were effectively identical to what was offered to
the Nixon administration four years earlier. Those four years cost
America billions of dollars and over 35,000 war deaths and
casualties, and resulted in the deaths of over 300,000 Vietnamese.
And those years were the direct result of the supposed master plan
of the most important voice in the Nixon White House on American
foreign policy: Henry Kissinger. Using newly available archival
material from the Nixon Presidential Library and Kissinger's
personal papers, Robert K. Brigham shows how Kissinger's approach
to Vietnam was driven by personal political rivalries and strategic
confusion, while domestic politics played an outsized influence on
Kissinger's so-called strategy. There was no great master plan or
Bismarckian theory that supported how the US continued the war or
conducted peace negotiations. As a result, a distant tragedy was
perpetuated, forever changing both countries. Now, perhaps for the
first time, we can see the full scale of that tragedy and the
machinations that fed it.
Triumph Regained: The Vietnam War, 1965-1968 is the long-awaited
sequel to the immensely influential Triumph Forsaken: The Vietnam
War, 1954-1965. Like its predecessor, this book overturns the
conventional wisdom using a treasure trove of new sources, many of
them from the North Vietnamese side. Rejecting the standard
depiction of U.S. military intervention as a hopeless folly, it
shows America's war to have been a strategic necessity that could
have ended victoriously had President Lyndon Johnson heeded the
advice of his generals. In light of Johnson's refusal to use
American ground forces beyond South Vietnam, General William
Westmoreland employed the best military strategy available. Once
the White House loosened the restraints on Operation Rolling
Thunder, American bombing inflicted far greater damage on the North
Vietnamese supply system than has been previously understood, and
it nearly compelled North Vietnam to capitulate. The book
demonstrates that American military operations enabled the South
Vietnamese government to recover from the massive instability that
followed the assassination of President Ngo Dinh Diem. American
culture sustained public support for the war through the end of
1968, giving South Vietnam realistic hopes for long-term survival.
America's defense of South Vietnam averted the imminent fall of key
Asian nations to Communism and sowed strife inside the Communist
camp, to the long-term detriment of America's great-power rivals,
China and the Soviet Union.
Ever since its foundation in 2002, the Guantanamo Bay Detention
Facility has become the symbol for many people around the world of
all that is wrong with the 'war on terror'. Secretive, inhumane,
and illegal by most international standards, it has been seen by
many as a testament to American hubris in the post-9/11 era. Yet
until now no one has written about the most revealing part of the
story - the prison's first 100 days. It was during this time that a
group of career military men and women tried to uphold the
traditional military codes of honour and justice that informed
their training in the face of a far more ruthless, less rule-bound,
civilian leadership in the Pentagon. They were defeated. This book
tells their story for the first time. It is a tale of how
individual officers on the ground at Guantanamo, along with their
direct superiors, struggled with their assignment from Washington,
only to be unwittingly co-opted into the Pentagon's plan to turn
the prison into an interrogation facility operating at the margins
of the law and beyond.
From September 1990 to June 1991, the UK deployed 53,462 military
personnel in the Gulf War. After the end of the conflict anecdotal
reports of various disorders affecting troops who fought in the
Gulf began to surface. This mysterious illness was given the name
"Gulf War Syndrome" (GWS). This book is an investigation into this
recently emergent illness, particularly relevant given ongoing UK
deployments to Iraq, describing how the illness became a potent
symbol for a plethora of issues, anxieties, and concerns. At
present, the debate about GWS is polarized along two lines: there
are those who think it is a unique, organic condition caused by
Gulf War toxins and those who argue that it is probably a
psychological condition that can be seen as part of a larger group
of illnesses. Using the methods and perspective of anthropology,
with its focus on nuances and subtleties, the author provides a new
approach to understanding GWS, one that makes sense of the cultural
circumstances, specific and general, which gave rise to the
illness.
Many have questioned the wisdom of the international
intervention in Afghanistan in light of the escalation of violence
and instability in the country in the past few years. Particularly
uncertain are Canadians, who have been inundated with media
coverage of an increasingly dirty war in southern Afghanistan, one
in which Canadians are at the frontline and suffering heavy
casualties. However, the conflict is only one aspect of
Afghanistan's complicated, and incomplete, political, economic, and
security transition.
In "Afghanistan: Transition under Threat, " leading Afghanistan
scholars and practitioners paint a full picture of the situation in
Afghanistan and the impact of international and particularly
Canadian assistance. They review the achievements of the
reconstruction process and outline future challenges, focusing on
key issues like the narcotics trade, the Pakistan--Afghanistan
bilateral relationship, the Taliban-led insurgency, and continuing
endemic poverty. This collection provides new insight into the
nature and state of Afghanistan's post-conflict transition and
illustrates the consequences of failure.
Co-published with the Centre for International Governance
Innovation
|
|