|
|
Books > Humanities > History > European history > General
A noted World War I scholar examines the critical decisions and
events that led to Germany's defeat, arguing that the German loss
was caused by collapse at home as well as on the front. Much has
been written about the causes for the outbreak of World War I and
the ways in which the war was fought, but few historians have
tackled the reasons why the Germans, who appeared on the surface to
be winning for most of the war, ultimately lost. This book, in
contrast, presents an in-depth examination of the complex interplay
of factors-social, cultural, military, economic, and
diplomatic-that led to Germany's defeat. The highly readable work
begins with an examination of the strengths and weaknesses of the
two coalitions and points out how the balance of forces was clearly
on the side of the Entente in a long and drawn-out war. The work
then probes the German plan to win the war quickly and the
resulting campaigns of August and September 1914 that culminated in
the devastating defeat in the First Battle of the Marne. Subsequent
chapters discuss the critical factors and decisions that led to
Germany's loss, including the British naval blockade, the role of
economic factors in maintaining a consensus for war, and the social
impact of material deprivation. Starts a new and fuller discussion
of Germany's defeat that goes beyond the battlefields of the
Western Front Argues that Germany's defeat was caused by a complex
interplay of domestic, social, and economic forces as well as by
military and diplomatic factors Integrates the internal problems
the German people experienced with Germany's defeats at sea and on
land Highlights the critical role played by Britain and the United
States in bringing about Germany's defeat Discusses the failures of
German military planning and the failure of the nation's political
leaders and military leaders to understand that war is the
continuation of diplomacy by other means
Louis IX, king of France from 1226 to 1270 and twice crusader, was
canonized in 1297. He was the last king canonized during the
medieval period, and was both one of the most important saints and
one of the most important kings of the later Middle Ages. In
Blessed Louis, the Most Glorious of Kings: Texts Relating to the
Cult of Saint Louis of France, M. Cecilia Gaposchkin presents six
previously untranslated texts that informed medieval views of St.
Louis IX: two little-known but early and important vitae of Saint
Louis; two unedited sermons by the Parisian preacher Jacob of
Lausanne (d. 1322); and a liturgical office and proper mass in his
honor-the most commonly used liturgical texts composed for Louis'
feast day-which were widely copied, read, and disseminated in the
Middle Ages. Gaposchkin's aim is to present to a diverse readership
the Louis as he was known and experienced in the Middle Ages: a
saint celebrated by the faithful for his virtue and his deeds. She
offers for the first time to English readers a typical
hagiographical view of Saint Louis, one in counterbalance to that
set forth in Jean of Joinville's Life of Saint Louis. Although
Joinville's Life has dominated our views of Louis, Joinville's
famous account was virtually unknown beyond the French royal court
in the Middle Ages and was not printed until the sixteenth century.
His portrayal of Louis as an individual and deeply charismatic
personality is remarkable, but it is fundamentally unrepresentative
of the medieval understanding of Louis. The texts that Gaposchkin
translates give immediate access to the reasons why medieval
Christians took Louis to be a saint; the texts, and the image of
Saint Louis presented in them, she argues, must be understood
within the context of the developing history of sanctity and
sainthood at the end of the Middle Ages.
|
|