|
Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Western philosophy > Ancient Western philosophy to c 500 > General
John Palmer develops and defends a modal interpretation of
Parmenides, according to which he was the first philosopher to
distinguish in a rigorous manner the fundamental modalities of
necessary being, necessary non-being or impossibility, and
non-necessary or contingent being. This book accordingly
reconsiders his place in the historical development of Presocratic
philosophy in light of this new interpretation. Careful treatment
of Parmenides' specification of the ways of inquiry that define his
metaphysical and epistemological outlook paves the way for detailed
analyses of his arguments demonstrating the temporal and spatial
attributes of what is and cannot not be. Since the existence of
this necessary being does not preclude the existence of other
entities that are but need not be, Parmenides' cosmology can
straightforwardly be taken as his account of the origin and
operation of the world's mutable entities. Later chapters reassess
the major Presocratics' relation to Parmenides in light of the
modal interpretation, focusing particularly on Zeno, Melissus,
Anaxagoras, and Empedocles. In the end, Parmenides' distinction
among the principal modes of being, and his arguments regarding
what what must be must be like, simply in virtue of its mode of
being, entitle him to be seen as the founder of metaphysics or
ontology as a domain of inquiry distinct from natural philosophy
and theology. An appendix presents a Greek text of the fragments of
Parmenides' poem with English translation and textual notes.
This is the commentary attributed to Simplicius on Aristotle's "On
the Soul". It is intended to provide a wider readership with the
opportunity to assess the disputed question of authorship. Is the
work by Simplicius, or by his colleague Priscian, or by another
commentator? The commentary is a source for late Neoplatonist
theories of thought and sense perception and provides insight into
this area of Aristotle's thought. In this volume the Neoplatonist
commentator covers the first half of Aristotle's "On the Soul",
comprising Aristotle's survey of his predecessors and his own rival
account of the nature of the soul.
Most people think that the difficulty of balancing career and
personal/family relationships is the fault of present-day society
or is due to their own inadequacies. But in this major new book,
eminent moral philosopher Michael Slote argues that the difficulty
runs much deeper, that it is due to the essential nature of the
divergent goods involved in this kind of choice. He shows more
generally that perfect human happiness and perfect virtue are
impossible in principle, a view originally enunciated by Isaiah
Berlin, but much more thoroughly and synoptically defended here
than ever before.
Ancient Greek and modern-day Enlightenment thought typically
assumed that perfection was possible, and this is also true of
Romanticism and of most recent ethical theory. But if, as Slote
maintains, imperfection is inevitable, then our inherited
categories of virtue and personal good are far too limited and
unqualified to allow us to understand and cope with the richer and
more complex life that characterizes today's world. And The
Impossibility of Perfection argues in particular that we need some
new notions, new distinctions, and even new philosophical methods
in order to distill some of the ethical insights of recent feminist
thought and arrive at a fuller and more realistic picture of
ethical phenomena.
Epicurus on the Self reconstructs a part of Epicurean ethics which
only survives on the fragmentary papyrus rolls excavated from an
ancient library in Herculaneum, On Nature XXV. The aim of this book
is to contribute to a deeper understanding of Epicurus' moral
psychology, ethics and of its robust epistemological framework. The
book also explores how the notion of the self emerges in Epicurus'
struggle to express the individual perspective of oneself in the
process of one's holistic self-reflection as an individual
psychophysical being.
Did the ancient Greeks and Romans use psychoactive cannabis?
Scholars say that hemp was commonplace in the ancient world, but
there is no consensus on cannabis usage. According to botany, hemp
and cannabis are the same plant and thus the ancient Greeks and
Romans must have used it in their daily lives. Cultures parallel to
the ancient Greeks and Romans, like the Egyptians, Scythians, and
Hittites, were known to use cannabis in their medicine, religion
and recreational practices. Cannabis in the Ancient Greek and Roman
World surveys the primary references to cannabis in ancient Greek
and Roman texts and covers emerging scholarship about the plant in
the ancient world. Ancient Greek and Latin medical texts from the
Roman Empire contain the most mentions of the plant, where it
served as an effective ingredient in ancient pharmacy. Cannabis in
the Ancient Greek and Roman World focuses on the ancient rationale
behind cannabis and how they understood the plant's properties and
effects, as well as its different applications. For the first time
ever, this book provides a sourcebook with the original ancient
Greek and Latin, along with translations, of all references to
psychoactive cannabis in the Greek and Roman world. It covers the
archaeology of cannabis in the ancient world, including amazing
discoveries from Scythian burial sites, ancient proto-Zoroastrian
fire temples, Bronze Age Chinese burial sites, as well as evidence
in Greece and Rome. Beyond cannabis, Cannabis in the Ancient Greek
and Roman World also explores ancient views on medicine, pharmacy,
and intoxication.
The coursebook presents Plato and Aristotle as the two most
significant and groundbreaking thinkers of European thought from
the era of classical Greek philosophy. The author provides
prefatory orientation in the labyrinth of their complex thought and
sketches their metaphysics, problems of knowledge and ethics. He
departs from the fact that both thinkers are similar in striving to
overcome problems of their period by localizing the human being
into a hierarchical order of beings, which obliges in questions of
the possibility of knowledge as well as of the right conduct.
|
|