|
|
Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Western philosophy > Ancient Western philosophy to c 500 > General
While the early Platonic dialogues have often been explored and appreciated for their ethical content, the characteristc features of these dialogues are decidedly epistemological - Socrates' method of questions and answers, known as elenchos, Socrates' fascination with definition, Socrates' profession of ignorance, and Socrates' thesis that virtue is knowledge. Benson here attempts to uncover the epistemological view that underlies these previously neglected features of Socratic thought.
In this third Volume of Logological Investigations, Sandywell
continues his sociological reconstruction of the origins of
reflexive thought and discourse with special reference to
pre-Socratic philosophy and science and their socio-political
context.
He begins by criticizing traditional histories of philosophy which
abstract speculative thought from its sociocultural and historical
contexts, and proposes instead an explicitly contextual and
reflexive approach to ancient Greek society and culture.
Each chapter is devoted to a seminal figure or "school" of
reflection in early Greek philosophy. Special emphasis is placed
upon the verbal and rhetorical innovations of protophilosophy in
the sixth and fifth centuries BC. These chapters are also exemplary
displays of the distinctive Logological method of culture analysis
and through them Sandywell shows that by returning to the earliest
problematics of reflexivity in pre-modern culture we may gain an
insight into some of the central currents of modern and postmodern
self-reflection.
Since Friedrich Schleiermacher s work in the 1800s, scholars
interested in the literary dimension of Plato s writings have
sought to reconcile the dialogue form with the expository
imperative of philosophical argument. It is now common for
mainstream classicists and philosophers to attribute vital
importance to literary form in Plato, which they often explain in
terms of rhetorical devices serving didactic goals. This study
brings the disciplines of literary and classical studies into
methodological debate, questioning modern views of Plato s dialogue
form.
In the first part of this book, David Schur argues that the
literary features of Plato s dialogues when treated as "literary
cannot be limited to a single argumentative agenda. In the second
part, he demonstrates the validity of this point by considering a
rhetorical pattern of self-reflection that is prominent in the
Republic." He emphasizes that Plato s book consistently undermines
the goal-driven conversation that it portrays. Offering a
thought-provoking blend of methodological investigation and
methodical close reading, Schur suggests that the Republic"
qualifies the authority of its conclusions by displaying a strong
countercurrent of ongoing movement."
Geoffrey Lloyd engages in a wide-ranging exploration of what we can
learn from the study of ancient civilisations that is relevant to
fundamental problems, both intellectual and moral, that we still
face today. How far is it possible to arrive at an understanding of
alien systems of belief? Is it possible to talk meaningfully of
'science' and of its various constituent disciplines, 'astronomy',
'geography', 'anatomy', and so on, in the ancient world? Are logic
and its laws universal? Is there one ontology - a single world - to
which all attempts at understanding must be considered to be
directed? When we encounter apparently very different views of
reality, how far can that be put down to a difference in
conceptions of what needs explaining, or of what counts as an
explanation, or to different preferred modes of reasoning or styles
of inquiry? Do the notions of truth and belief represent reliable
cross-cultural universals? In another area, what can ancient
history teach us about today's social and political problems? Are
the discourses of human nature and of human rights universally
applicable? What political institutions do we need to help secure
equity and justice within nation states and between them? Lloyd
sets out to answer all these questions, and to convince us that the
science and culture of ancient Greece and China provide precious
resources to advance modern debates.
Theodore Metochites' Aristotelian paraphrases (c. 1312), covering
all 40 books of the Stagirite's extant works on natural philosophy,
constitute one of the major achievements of late Byzantine
learning. This volume offers the first critical edition of
Metochites' paraphrases of the three books of the De anima,
accompanied by an introduction and an English translation with an
apparatus of parallel passages in Aristotle's ancient commentators.
The first part of the introduction presents and evaluates the
sources for the text, consisting of thirteen Greek manuscripts, a
15th-century Greek epitome and a 16th-century Latin translation.
The genealogical relationships between these are established on the
basis of separative and conjunctive errors, identified, inter alia,
through critical discussions of more than 300 passages. The second
part of the introduction discusses the nature, purpose and sources
of the paraphrases as well as several linguistic questions with
implications for editing and translating the text. The third part
of the introduction sets out the principles of this edition and
translation.
Aristotle's treatise De Interpretatione is one of his central
works; it continues to be the focus of much attention and debate.
C. W. A. Whitaker presents the first systematic study of this work,
and offers a radical new view of its aims, its structure, and its
place in Aristotle's system, basing this view upon a detailed
chapter-by-chapter analysis. By treating the work systematically,
rather than concentrating on certain selected passages, Dr Whitaker
is able to show that, contrary to traditional opinion, it forms an
organized and coherent whole. He argues that the De Interpretatione
is intended to provide the underpinning for dialectic, the system
of argument by question and answer set out in Aristotle's Topics ;
and he rejects the traditional view that the De Interpretatione
concerns the assertion and is oriented towards the formal logic of
the Prior Analytics. In doing so, he sheds valuable new light on
some of Aristotle's most famous texts.
St. Maximus the Confessor (580-662), was a major Byzantine thinker,
a theologian and philosopher. He developed a philosophical theology
in which the doctrine of God, creation, the cosmic order, and
salvation is integrated in a unified conception of reality. Christ,
the divine Logos, is the centre of the principles (the logoi )
according to which the cosmos is created, and in accordance with
which it shall convert to its divine source.
Torstein Tollefsen treats Maximus' thought from a philosophical
point of view, and discusses similar thought patterns in pagan
Neoplatonism. The study focuses on Maximus' doctrine of creation,
in which he denies the possibility of eternal coexistence of
uncreated divinity and created and limited being. Tollefsen shows
that by the logoi God institutes an ordered cosmos in which
separate entities of different species are ontologically
interrelated, with man as the centre of the created world. The book
also investigates Maximus' teaching of God's activities or
energies, and shows how participation in these energies is
conceived according to the divine principles of the logoi. An
extensive discussion of the complex topic of participation is
provided.
 |
Laws
(Paperback)
Plato; Translated by C. D. C Reeve
|
R593
Discovery Miles 5 930
|
Ships in 10 - 15 working days
|
|
|
"This is a superb new translation that is remarkably accurate to
Plato's very difficult Greek, yet clear and highly readable. The
notes are more helpful than those in any other available
translation of the Laws since they contain both the information
needed by the beginning student as well as analytical notes that
include references to the secondary literature for the more
advanced reader. For either the beginner or the scholar, this
should be the preferred translation." -- Christopher Bobonich,
Clarence Irving Lewis Professor of Philosophy, Stanford University
A new translation, with an Introduction, by Gregory Hays
Marcus Aurelius Antoninus (a.d. 121-180) succeeded his adoptive
father as emperor of Rome in a.d. 161--and "Meditations" remains
one of the greatest works of spiritual and ethical reflection ever
written. With a profound understanding of human behavior, Marcus
provides insights, wisdom, and practical guidance on everything
from living in the world to coping with adversity to interacting
with others. Consequently, the "Meditations" have become required
reading for statesmen and philosophers alike, while generations of
ordinary readers have responded to the straightforward intimacy of
his style. In Gregory Hays's new translation--the first in a
generation--Marcus's thoughts speak with a new immediacy: never
before have they been so directly and powerfully presented.
Philoponus' On Aristotle Categories 1-5 discusses the nature of
universals, preserving the views of Philoponus' teacher Ammonius,
as well as presenting a Neoplatonist interpretation of Aristotle's
Categories. Philoponus treats universals as concepts in the human
mind produced by abstracting a form or nature from the material
individual in which it has its being. The work is important for its
own philosophical discussion and for the insight it sheds on its
sources. For considerable portions, On Aristotle Categories 1-5
resembles the wording of an earlier commentary which declares
itself to be an anonymous record taken from the seminars of
Ammonius. Unlike much of Philoponus' later writing, this commentary
does not disagree with either Aristotle or Ammonius, and suggests
the possibility that Philoponus either had access to this earlier
record or wrote it himself. This edition explores these questions
of provenance, alongside the context, meaning and implications of
Philoponus' work. The English translation is accompanied by an
introduction, comprehensive commentary notes, bibliography,
glossary of translated terms and a subject index. The latest volume
in the Ancient Commentators on Aristotle series, the edition makes
this philosophical work accessible to a modern readership.
Philoponus was a Christian writing in Greek in 6th century CE
Alexandria, where some students of philosophy were bilingual in
Syriac as well as Greek. In this Greek treatise translated from the
surviving Syriac version, Philoponus discusses the logic of parts
and wholes, and he illustrates the spread of the pagan and
Christian philosophy of 6th century CE Greeks to other cultures, in
this case to Syria. Philoponus, an expert on Aristotle's
philosophy, had turned to theology and was applying his knowledge
of Aristotle to disputes over the human and divine nature of
Christ. Were there two natures and were they parts of a whole, as
the Emperor Justinian proposed, or was there only one nature, as
Philoponus claimed with the rebel minority, both human and divine?
If there were two natures, were they parts like the ingredients in
a chemical mixture? Philoponus attacks the idea. Such ingredients
are not parts, because they each inter-penetrate the whole mixture.
Moreover, he abandons his ingenious earlier attempts to support
Aristotle's view of mixture by identifying ways in which such
ingredients might be thought of as potentially preserved in a
chemical mixture. Instead, Philoponus says that the ingredients are
destroyed, unlike the human and divine in Christ. This English
translation of Philoponus' treatise is the latest volume in the
Ancient Commentators on Aristotle series and makes this
philosophical work accessible to a modern readership. The
translation in each volume is accompanied by an introduction,
comprehensive commentary notes, bibliography, glossary of
translated terms and a subject index.
Named by Rowan Williams as one of his Books of the Year (2021) in
the New Statesman. Socrates On Trial tells of Socrates's return to
a modern city that is plagued by prejudice, privilege and populism.
On resuming his questioning in the agora he is arrested,
interrogated by his prosecutors, questioned by his Judge, and
confessed to by his inquisitor. On a Festival Day, he explores a
new model for the just city --a city based not on mastery but on
learning --before offering a new apology to the court that will,
once again, decide his fate. This new/old Socrates offers the city
a renewed vision of justice by reconceptualizing the meaning and
significance of thinking and education. From the force of Socratic
questioning, he unfolds a different logic of truth, freedom, and
justice. His conversations exert a gravitational force that draws
key cultural elements of the city -- property, wealth, money,
family, essence, gendered and racialized identities, production,
distribution and consumption -- into its educational orbit. At
stake here is the vulnerability of modern democracy to
authoritarian leaders and their sponsors. Influenced by
sophisticated propaganda people's frustration with democracy is
channeled into visceral anger on the one hand, and into
disillusioned scepticism and cynicism on the other. Belief in truth
and education collapses in exhaustion and fatigue, caught in the
headlights of seemingly irresolvable and petrifying rational
paradoxes that block all paths to social justice. Socrates On
Trial, describing the return of Socrates to the modern city,
heralds a new education for such a city.
Aristotle's account of place, in which he defined a thing's place
as the inner surface of its nearest immobile container, was
supported by the Latin Middle Ages, even 1600 years after his
death, though it had not convinced many ancient Greek philosophers.
The sixth century commentator Philoponus took a more common-sense
view. For him, place was an immobile three-dimensional extension,
whose essence did not preclude its being empty, even if for other
reasons it had always to be filled with body. However, Philoponus
reserved his own definition for an excursus, already translated in
this series, The Corollary on Place. In the text translated here he
wanted instead to explain Aristotle's view to elementary students.
The recent conjecture that he wished to attract young fellow
Christians away from the official pagan professor of philosophy in
Alexandria has the merit of explaining why he expounds Aristotle
here, rather than attacking him. But he still puts the students
through their paces, for example when discussing Aristotle's claim
that place cannot be a body, or two bodies would coincide. This
volume contains an English translation of Philoponus' commentary,
as well as a detailed introduction, extensive explanatory notes and
a bibliography.
George James was a professor at a small black college in Arkansas
during the 1950s when he wrote this book. Originally from Guyana,
he was an intellectual who studied African and European classics.
He soon realized something was wrong with the way the history of
philosophy had been documented by Western scholars. Their biggest
mistake, according to James, was they had assumed philosophy had
started with the Greeks. James had found that philosophy was almost
entirely from ancient Egypt and that the records of this had not
only been distorted but, in many cases, deliberately falsified. His
conclusion was that there was no such thing as Greek philosophy
because it was stolen from the Egyptians. As a result, this was one
of the first books to be banned from colleges and universities
throughout North America. Although opponents have eventually found
some flaws, it remains a groundbreaking book to this day. Even the
famous Greek historian from the 5th century, Herodotus, admitted
that the Greeks had borrowed many important ideas and concepts from
the Egyptians. These ideas covered not just philosophy, but also
medicine, architecture, politics and more. The purpose of this book
is to restore the truth about African contributions to higher
thought and culture.
From Natural Character to Moral Virtue in Aristotle discusses
Aristotle's biological views about character and the importance of
what he calls 'natural character traits' for the development of
moral virtue as presented in his ethical treatises. The aim is to
provide a new, comprehensive account of the physiological
underpinnings of moral development and thereby to show, first, that
Aristotle's ethical theories do not exhaust his views about
character as has traditionally been assumed, and, second, that his
treatment of natural character in the biological treatises provides
the conceptual and ideological foundation for his views about
habituation as developed in his ethics. Author Mariska Leunissen
takes seriously Aristotle's-often ignored-claim that nature is one
of the factors through which men become 'good and capable of fine
deeds'. Part I ('The Physiology of Natural Character') analyzes, in
three chapters, Aristotle's notion of natural character as it is
developed in the biological treatises and its role in moral
development, especially as it affects women and certain
'barbarians'-groups who are typically left out of accounts of
Aristotle's ethics. Leunissen also discuss its relevance for our
understanding of physiognomical ideas in Aristotle. Part II ('The
Physiology of Moral Development) explores the psychophysical
changes in body and soul one is required to undergo in the process
of acquiring moral virtues. It includes a discussion of Aristotle's
eugenic views, of his identification of habituation as a form of
human perfection, and of his claims about the moral deficiencies of
women that link them to his beliefs about their biological
imperfections.
During the past three decades Jaap Mansfeld, Professor of Ancient
Philosophy in Utrecht, has built up a formidable reputation as a
leading scholar in his field. His work has concentrated on the
Presocratics, Hellenistic Philosophy, the sources of our knowledge
of ancient philosophy (esp. doxography) and the history of
scholarship. In honour of his sixtieth birthday, colleagues and
friends have contributed a collection of articles which represent
the state of the art in the study of the history of ancient
philosophy and frequently concentrate on subjects in which the
honorand has made important discoveries. The 22 contributors
include M. Baltes, J. Barnes, J. Brunschwig, W.M. Calder III, J.
Dillon, P.L. Donini, J. Glucker, A.A. Long, L.M. de Rijk, D.
Sedley, P. Schrijvers, and M. Vegetti. The volume concludes with a
complete bibliography of Jaap Mansfeld's scholarly work so far.
|
|