|
|
Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Western philosophy > Western philosophy, c 500 to c 1600 > General
Peter Adamson explores the rich intellectual history of the
Byzantine Empire and the Italian Renaissance. Peter Adamson
presents an engaging and wide-ranging introduction to the thinkers
and movements of two great intellectual cultures: Byzantium and the
Italian Renaissance. First he traces the development of philosophy
in the Eastern Christian world, from such early figures as John of
Damascus in the eighth century to the late Byzantine scholars of
the fifteenth century. He introduces major figures like Michael
Psellos, Anna Komnene, and Gregory Palamas, and examines the
philosophical significance of such cultural phenomena as iconoclasm
and conceptions of gender. We discover the little-known traditions
of philosophy in Syriac, Armenian, and Georgian. These chapters
also explore the scientific, political, and historical literature
of Byzantium. There is a close connection to the second half of the
book, since thinkers of the Greek East helped to spark the humanist
movement in Italy. Adamson tells the story of the rebirth of
philosophy in Italy in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. We
encounter such famous names as Christine de Pizan, Niccolo
Machiavelli, Giordano Bruno, and Galileo, but as always in this
book series such major figures are read alongside contemporaries
who are not so well known, including such fascinating figures as
Lorenzo Valla, Girolamo Savonarola, and Bernardino Telesio. Major
historical themes include the humanist engagement with ancient
literature, the emergence of women humanists, the flowering of
Republican government in Renaissance Italy, the continuation of
Aristotelian and scholastic philosophy alongside humanism, and
breakthroughs in science. All areas of philosophy, from theories of
economics and aesthetics to accounts of the human mind, are
featured. This is the sixth volume of Adamson's History of
Philosophy Without Any Gaps, taking us to the threshold of the
early modern era.
Augustine's Confessions is one of the most significant works of
Western culture. Cast as a long, impassioned conversation with God,
it is intertwined with passages of life-narrative and with key
theological and philosophical insights. It is enduringly popular,
and justly so. The Routledge Guidebook to Augustine's Confessions
is an engaging introduction to this spiritually creative and
intellectually original work. This guidebook is organized by
themes: the importance of language creation and the sensible world
memory, time and the self the afterlife of the Confessions. Written
for readers approaching the Confessions for the first time, this
guidebook addresses the literary, philosophical, historical and
theological complexities of the work in a clear and accessible way.
Excerpts in both Latin and English from this seminal work are
included throughout the book to provide a close examination of both
the autobiographical and theoretical content within the
Confessions.
Aristotle in Aquinas's Theology explores the role of Aristotelian
concepts, principles, and themes in Thomas Aquinas's theology. Each
chapter investigates the significance of Aquinas's theological
reception of Aristotle in a central theological domain: the
Trinity, the angels, soul and body, the Mosaic law, grace, charity,
justice, contemplation and action, Christ, and the sacraments. In
general, the essays focus on the Summa theologiae, but some range
more widely in Aquinas's corpus. For some time, it has above all
been the influence of Aristotle on Aquinas's philosophy that has
been the centre of attention. Perhaps in reaction to philosophical
neo-Thomism, or perhaps because this Aristotelian influence appears
no longer necessary to demonstrate, the role of Aristotle in
Aquinas's theology presently receives less theological attention
than does Aquinas's use of other authorities (whether Scripture or
particular Fathers), especially in domains outside of theological
ethics. Indeed, in some theological circles the influence of
Aristotle upon Aquinas's theology is no longer well understood.
Readers will encounter here the great Aristotelian themes, such as
act and potency, God as pure act, substance and accidents, power
and generation, change and motion, fourfold causality, form and
matter, hylomorphic anthropology, the structure of intellection,
the relationship between knowledge and will, happiness and
friendship, habits and virtues, contemplation and action, politics
and justice, the best form of government, and private property and
the common good. The ten essays in this book engage Aquinas's
reception of Aristotle in his theology from a variety of points of
view: historical, philosophical, and constructively theological.
Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy showcases the best scholarly
research in this flourishing field. The series covers all aspects
of medieval philosophy, including the Latin, Arabic, and Hebrew
traditions, and runs from the end of antiquity into the
Renaissance. It publishes new work by leading scholars in the
field, and combines historical scholarship with philosophical
acuteness. The papers will address a wide range of topics, from
political philosophy to ethics, and logic to metaphysics. OSMP is
an essential resource for anyone working in the area.
Graciela De Pierris presents a novel interpretation of the
relationship between skepticism and naturalism in Hume's
epistemology, and a new appraisal of Hume's place within early
modern thought. Whereas a dominant trend in recent Hume scholarship
maintains that there are no skeptical arguments concerning
causation and induction in Book I, Part III of the Treatise,
Graciela De Pierris presents a detailed reading of the skeptical
argument she finds there and how this argument initiates a train of
skeptical reasoning that begins in Part III and culminates in Part
IV. This reasoning is framed by Hume's version of the modern theory
of ideas developed by Descartes and Locke. The skeptical
implications of this theory, however, do not arise, as in
traditional interpretations of Hume's skepticism, from the 'veil of
perception.' They arise from Hume's elaboration of a
presentational-phenomenological model of ultimate evidence,
according to which there is always a justificatory gap between what
is or has been immediately presented to the mind and any ideas that
go beyond it. This happens, paradigmatically, in the
causal-inductive inference, and, as De Pierris argues, in
demonstrative inference as well. Yet, in spite of his firm
commitment to radical skepticism, Hume also accepts the
naturalistic standpoint of science and common life, and he does so,
on the novel interpretation presented here, because of an equally
firm commitment to Newtonian science in general and the Newtonian
inductive method in particular. Hume defends the Newtonian method
(against the mechanical philosophy) while simultaneously rejecting
all attempts (including those of the Newtonians) to find a place
for the supernatural within our understanding of nature.
In seventeenth-century philosophy the mind-body problem and the
nature of personal immortality were two of the most controversial
and sensitive issues. Nicholas Jolley seeks to show that these
issues are more prominent in Locke's philosophy than has been
realized. He argues further that Locke takes up unorthodox
positions in both cases. Although Locke's official stance on the
mind-body problem is agnostic, in places he presents arguments
that, taken together, amount to a significant case for a weak form
of materialism. Locke also seeks to show that the solution to the
mind-body problem is irrelevant to the issue of personal
immortality: for Locke, such immortality is conceptually possible
even if the same body is not resurrected at the Day of Judgment.
Jolley throws new light on such central topics in An Essay
Concerning Human Understanding as substance and personal identity:
he also pays close attention to such neglected topics as his
account of the status of animals and his polemic against the thesis
that the mind always thinks. Throughout, the book examines Locke's
arguments against the background of Descartes' views. Jolley argues
that Locke's criticisms of Descartes are no mere defences of common
sense against dogmatism; rather, they are controversial responses
to some of the most challenging metaphysical and theological issues
of his time.
Thomas Aquinas is widely recognized as one of history's most
significant Christian theologians and one of the most powerful
philosophical minds of the western tradition. But what has often
not been sufficiently attended to is the fact that he carried out
his theological and philosophical labours as a part of his vocation
as a Dominican friar, dedicated to a life of preaching and the care
of souls. Fererick Christian Bauerschmidt places Aquinas's thought
within the context of that vocation, and argues that his views on
issues of God, creation, Christology, soteriology, and the
Christian life are both shaped by and in service to the distinctive
goals of the Dominicans. What Aquinas says concerning both matters
of faith and matters of reason, as well as his understanding of the
relationship between the two, are illuminated by the particular
Dominican call to serve God through handing on to others through
preaching and teaching the fruits of one's own theological
reflection.
Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy showcases the best scholarly
research in this flourishing field. The series covers all aspects
of medieval philosophy, including the Latin, Arabic, and Hebrew
traditions, and runs from the end of antiquity into the
Renaissance. It publishes new work by leading scholars in the
field, and combines historical scholarship with philosophical
acuteness. The papers will address a wide range of topics, from
political philosophy to ethics, and logic to metaphysics. OSMP is
an essential resource for anyone working in the area.
Descartes and the First Cartesians adopts the perspective that we
should not approach Rene Descartes as a solitary thinker, but as a
philosopher who constructs a dialogue with his contemporaries, so
as to engage them and elements of his society into his
philosophical enterprise. Roger Ariew argues that an important
aspect of this engagement concerns the endeavor to establish
Cartesian philosophy in the Schools, that is, to replace Aristotle
as the authority there. Descartes wrote the Principles of
Philosophy as something of a rival to Scholastic textbooks,
initially conceiving the project as a comparison of his philosophy
and that of the Scholastics. Still, what Descartes produced was
inadequate for the task. The topics of Scholastic textbooks ranged
more broadly than those of Descartes; they usually had
quadripartite arrangements mirroring the structure of the
collegiate curriculum, divided as they typically were into logic,
ethics, physics, and metaphysics. But Descartes produced at best
only what could be called a general metaphysics and a partial
physics. These deficiencies in the Cartesian program and in its
aspiration to replace Scholastic philosophy in the schools caused
the Cartesians to rush in to fill the voids. The attempt to publish
a Cartesian textbook that would mirror what was taught in the
schools began in the 1650s with Jacques Du Roure and culminated in
the 1690s with Pierre-Sylvain Regis and Antoine Le Grand. Ariew's
original account thus considers the reception of Descartes' work,
and establishes the significance of his philosophical enterprise in
relation to the textbooks of the first Cartesians and in contrast
with late Scholastic textbooks.
For nearly four centuries, when logic was the heart of what we now
call the 'undergraduate curriculum', Peter of Spain's Summaries of
Logic (c. 1230) was the basis for teaching that subject. Because
Peter's students were teenagers, he wrote simply and organized his
book carefully. Since no book about logic was read by more people
until the twentieth century, the Summaries has extensively and
profoundly influenced the distinctly Western way of speaking
formally and writing formal prose by constructing well-formed
sentences, making valid arguments, and refuting and defending
arguments in debate. Some books, like the Authorized Version of the
English Bible and the collected plays of Shakespeare, have been
more influential in the Anglophone world than Peter's Summaries-but
not many. This new English translation, based on an update of the
Latin text of Lambertus De Rijk, comes with an extensive
introduction that deals with authorship, dating, and the place of
the Summaries in the development of logic, before providing a
chapter-by-chapter analysis of Peter's book, followed by an
analysis of his system from the point of view of modern logic. The
Latin text is presented on facing pages with the English
translation, accompanied by notes, and the book includes a full
bibliography.
Richard Cross provides the first complete and detailed account of
Duns Scotus's theory of cognition, tracing the processes involved
in cognition from sensation, through intuition and abstraction, to
conceptual thought. He provides an analysis of the ontological
status of the various mental items (acts and dispositions) involved
in cognition, and a new account of Scotus on nature of conceptual
content. Cross goes on to offer a novel, reductionist,
interpretation of Scotus's view of the ontological status of
representational content, as well as new accounts of Scotus's
opinions on intuitive cognition, intelligible species, and the
varieties of consciousness. Scotus was a perceptive but highly
critical reader of his intellectual forebears, and this volume
places his thought clearly within the context of thirteenth-century
reflections on cognitive psychology, influenced as they were by
Aristotle, Augustine, and Avicenna. As far as possible, Duns
Scotus's Theory of Cognition traces developments in Scotus's
thought during the ten or so highly productive years that formed
the bulk of his intellectual life.
Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy showcases the best scholarly
research in this flourishing field. The series covers all aspects
of medieval philosophy, including the Latin, Arabic, and Hebrew
traditions, and runs from the end of antiquity into the
Renaissance. It publishes new work by leading scholars in the
field, and combines historical scholarship with philosophical
acuteness. The papers will address a wide range of topics, from
political philosophy to ethics, and logic to metaphysics. OSMP is
an essential resource for anyone working in the area.
"Codices Boethiani" is a catalogue of all the Latin manuscripts of
the works of Boethius, including his translations of Aristotle and
Porphyry. When completed, it is expected to comprise seven volumes
arranged geographically, and a general index (although each volume
will also be indexed separately). The conspectus includes
fragmentary texts, as witnesses to once-complete versions, but not
excerpts, abbreviations and vernacular translations. Each entry
comprises a short physical description of the manuscript, a
complete list of contents, a note of any glosses present, a brief
summary of any decoration, the provenance of the manuscript and a
select bibliography. Particular attention is paid to the use of the
manuscripts. Since Boethius was a pillar of artes teaching, these
manuscripts give a particularly interesting insight into who was
taught what, where, to what level, and in what way. The three
volumes published so far are: "I Great Britain and the Republic of
Ireland (WI Surveys & Texts 25)"; "II Austria, Belgium,
Denmark, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Sweden and Switzerland (WI
Surveys & Texts 27)"; and, "III Italy and the Vatican City (WI
Surveys & Texts 28)". The number of Boethian manuscripts in the
Iberian Peninsula is modest compared with those in the British
Isles and Italy, partly, perhaps, because of the Arab domination
there; the oldest manuscripts come from Ripoll in Catalonia, which
was always under Christian control. The Portuguese manuscripts
contain 5 Boethian items, the Spanish, 153, of which the De
Consolatione Philosophiae occurs most often. Some of these
manuscripts are of exceptional quality, and many of them include
extensive glosses.
Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy showcases the best scholarly
research in this flourishing field. The series covers all aspects
of medieval philosophy, including the Latin, Arabic, and Hebrew
traditions, and runs from the end of antiquity into the
Renaissance. It publishes new work by leading scholars in the
field, and combines historical scholarship with philosophical
acuteness. The papers will address a wide range of topics, from
political philosophy to ethics, and logic to metaphysics. OSMP is
an essential resource for anyone working in the area.
Was man in der alteuropaischen Metaphysik "das Wesen" des Menschen
genannt hat, ist historisch zugrunde gegangen. Die Spezifik des
Menschen wurde in seiner dualistischen Aufspaltung, entweder Seele
oder Korper zu sein, und in seiner monistischen Auflosung, ganz
Natur oder Geist zu sein, verfehlt. Gleichwohl sind wir alle in
unserem Common sense praktisch der Frage ausgesetzt, wie wir die
naturlichen, sozialen und kulturellen Aspekte unserer Existenz in
der Fuhrung eines menschlichen Lebens sinnvoll berucksichtigen
konnen. Die neuen Reproduktions-, Umwelt-, Kommunikations- und
Sozialtechnologien werfen taglich die Frage auf, was es heisst, als
vergleichbare Person und als Individuum ein menschliches Leben zu
fuhren. Die "Philosophische Anthropologie" (Helmuth Plessner) hat
die Spezifik menschlicher Phanomene naturphilosophisch als eine
Besonderheit im Spielverhalten hoherer Saugetiere erschlossen. Im
Spielen kann Verhalten von seinem ursprunglichen Antrieb abgelost
und an einen neuen Antrieb gebunden werden. Dies gelingt seitens
des Organismus um so besser, je ruckbezuglicher seine zentrische
Form (Gehirn) der Selbstreproduktion wird. Dadurch entsteht aber
eine Ambivalenz in den Zentrierungsrichtungen des Verhaltens,
namlich spontan aus der leiblichen Funktionsmitte des Organismus
heraus oder von den korperlich moglichen Funktionsmitten der Umwelt
her. Diese Ambivalenz bedarf zur Stutzung entsprechender
soziokultureller Losungsformen, in denen sie lebbar verschrankt
werden kann. Wer wie z. B. Kinder spielt, lebt in der Differenz,
sein Verhalten verkorpern (von einem Zentrum ausserhalb des eigenen
Leibes her koordinieren) und verleiblichen (auf seinen eigenen
unvertretbaren Leib hin zentrieren) konnen zu mussen. Die
(kategorische) Not solcher Lebewesen, ihre beiden
Zentrierungsrichtungen ausbalancieren zu mussen, kann aber auf
kontingente Weise (konjunktivisch) befriedigt werden. Dieser
"Kategorische Konjunktiv" (Plessner) der Lebensfuhrung macht
Menschen einer geschichtlich zu erringenden soziokulturellen Natur
bedurftig. Im ersten des auf zwei Bande konzipierten Werks wird
Plessners "Kategorischer Konjunktiv" als ein Spektrum menschlicher
Phanomene vorgefuhrt, in denen sich unsere verschiedenen leiblichen
und korperlichen Sinne zu einer Funktionseinheit verschranken. Der
Zusammenhang unserer Sinne ergibt sich daraus, dass jeder Mensch
lebensgeschichtlich eine soziokulturelle Elementarrolle spielt.
Dank dieser kann man sich personalisieren (vergleichbar werden) und
im Unterschied zu ihr individualisieren. Das Schauspielen der Rolle
gerinnt in Ausdrucks-, Handlungs- und Sprachformen, unter denen die
westliche Modernisierung hochst einseitig solche der
Selbstbeherrschung durch Selbstbewusstsein ausgezeichnet hat. Das
Ausspielen der Rolle findet aber seine Verhaltensgrenzen in
Phanomenen ungespielten Lachens und Weinens, in denen die Zuordnung
zwischen Individuum und Person nicht mehr gelingt. Das
Eingespieltsein zwischen sich als Person und Individuum kann im
ungespielten Lachen zu mehrsinnig oder im ungespielten Weinen
sinnlos werden. Die soziolkulturell zu bestimmter Zeit anerkannten
Rollen werden aber individuell durch Suchte und Leidenschaften und
geschichtlich durch kulturelle Entfremdung der Nachwachsenden und
gesellschaftliche Offnung der Gemeinschaftsformen wieder aus der
Balance gebracht. Daraus resultiert das Problem der geschichtlichen
Selbstermachtigung von Individuen und Generationen. Plessners neue
Konzeption souveraner Formen von Macht, die aus der Relation zur
eigenen Unbestimmtheit zu gewinnen sind, und im Hinblick auf die
moderne Emanzipation der Macht fur plurale Gesellschaften als
Minima moralia erortert. In den Verhaltensgrenzen des angespielten
Lachen und Weinens werden wir uns unbestimmt. Wer diese Grenzen
uberschreitet, begeht der Moglichkeit nach Unmenschliches."
Leo Strauss argued that the most visible fact about Machiavelli's
doctrine is also the most useful one: Machiavelli seems to be a
teacher of wickedness. Strauss sought to incorporate this idea in
his interpretation without permitting it to overwhelm or exhaust
his exegesis of "The Prince" and the "Discourses on the First Ten
Books of Livy." "We are in sympathy," he writes, "with the simple
opinion about Machiavelli [namely, the wickedness of his teaching],
not only because it is wholesome, but above all because a failure
to take that opinion seriously prevents one from doing justice to
what is truly admirable in Machiavelli: the intrepidity of his
thought, the grandeur of his vision, and the graceful subtlety of
his speech." This critique of the founder of modern political
philosophy by this prominent twentieth-century scholar is an
essential text for students of both authors.
The multi-author Essays in Later Mediaeval Metaphysics focuses
primarily on 13th and 14th century Latin treatments of some of the
most important metaphysical issues as conceived by many of the most
important thinkers of the day. Thomas Aquinas, John Duns Scotus,
William of Ockham, Walter Chatton, John Buridan, Dietrich of
Freiburg, Robert Holcot, Walter Burley, and the 11th century
Islamic philosopher Ibn-Sina (Avicenna) are among the figures
examined here. The work begins with standard ontological
topics-e.g., the nature of existence, and of metaphysics generally;
the status of universals, form, and accidents. Here, a number of
questions are considered. What is the proper subject matter of
metaphysical speculation? Are essence and existence really distinct
in bodies? Furthermore, does the body lose its unifying form at
death? Can an accident of a substance exist in separation from that
substance? Are universals real, and if so, are they anything more
than general concepts? There is also an emphasis on metaphysics
broadly conceived. Thus, discussions of theories of mediaeval
logic, epistemology, and language are added to provide a fuller
account of the range of ideas included in the later mediaeval
worldview. Many questions are raised in this context as well. What
are the objects of propositional attitudes? How does Aristotelian
logic stand up against modern predicate calculus? Are infinite
regress arguments defensible in metaphysical contexts? How are the
notions of analogy and equivocation related to the concept of
being? Contributors include scholars of mediaeval philosophy from
across North America: Rega Wood (Indiana), Gyula Klima (Fordham),
Brian Francis Conolly (Bard College at Simon's Rock ), Charles
Bolyard (James Madison), Martin Tweedale (emeritus, Alberta), Jack
Zupko (Winnipeg), Susan Brower-Toland (St. Louis), Rondo Keele
(Louisiana Scholars' College), Terence Parsons (UC-Irvine), and E.
J. Ashworth (emeritus, Waterloo).
What is thinking? What does it feel like? What is it good for?
Andrea Gadberry looks for answers to these questions in the
philosophy of Rene Descartes and finds them in the philosopher's
implicit poetics. Gadberry argues that Descartes's thought was
crucially enabled by poetry and shows how markers of poetic genres
from love lyric and elegy to the puzzling forms of the riddle and
the anagram betray an impassioned negotiation with the difficulties
of thought and its limits. Where others have seen Cartesian
philosophy as a triumph of reason, Gadberry reveals that the
philosopher accused of having "slashed poetry's throat" instead
enlisted poetic form to contain thought's frustrations. Gadberry's
approach to seventeenth-century writings poses questions urgent for
the twenty-first. Bringing literature and philosophy into rich
dialogue, Gadberry centers close reading as a method uniquely
equipped to manage skepticism, tolerate critical ambivalence, and
detect feeling in philosophy. Helping us read classic moments of
philosophical argumentation in a new light, this elegant study also
expands outward to redefine thinking in light of its poetic
formations.
More than any other early modern text, Montaigne's Essais have come
to be associated with the emergence of a distinctively modern
subjectivity, defined in opposition to the artifices of language
and social performance. Felicity Green challenges this
interpretation with a compelling revisionist reading of Montaigne's
text, centred on one of his deepest but hitherto most neglected
preoccupations: the need to secure for himself a sphere of liberty
and independence that he can properly call his own, or himself.
Montaigne and the Life of Freedom restores the Essais to its
historical context by examining the sources, character and
significance of Montaigne's project of self-study. That project, as
Green shows, reactivates and reshapes ancient practices of
self-awareness and self-regulation, in order to establish the self
as a space of inner refuge, tranquillity and dominion, free from
the inward compulsion of the passions and from subjection to
external objects, forces and persons.
This volume belongs to the new critical edition of the complete
works of Francis Bacon (1561-1626). The edition presents the works
in broadly chronological order and in accordance with the
principles of modern textual scholarship. This volume contains
Bacon's earliest known writings, dating from 1584 to 1596,
comprising position papers, commentaries on printed works, legal
readings and opinions, and discourses of advice, usually written in
response to specific events or demands, and circulated in
manuscript. Bacon's writings to 1596 generally reflect his
professional occupations: legal, political, and parliamentary. They
include substantial writings on the Martin Marprelate controversy
of 1588-1589, Roman Catholic attacks on Elizabeth's government
(1593); dramatic entertainments put on at Gray's Inn and the court;
tracts on important legal cases of the period; notes from his
extensive reading; and letters of advice written for and to Bacon's
patron, Robert Devereux, second earl of Essex. Despite the
'occasional' nature of these writings, there is clearly visible
across them the early signs - 'seeds' as their author would call
them-of the philosophy Francis Bacon would later come to write. The
writings are presented with substantial introductions, and full
commentaries and glossaries
Medieval Considerations of Incest, Marriage, and Penance focuses on
the incest motif as used in numerous medieval narratives.
Explaining the weakness of great rulers, such as Charlemagne, or
the fall of legendary heroes, such as Arthur, incest stories also
reflect on changes to the sacramental regulations and practices
related to marriage and penance. Such changes demonstrate the
Church's increasing authority over the daily lives and
relationships of the laity. Treated here are a wide variety of
medieval texts, using as a central reference point Philippe de
Remi's thirteenth-century La Manekine, which presents one lay
author's reflections on the role of consent in marriage, the nature
of contrition and forgiveness, and even the meaning of relics.
Studying a variety of genres including medieval romance, epic,
miracles, and drama along with modern memoirs, films, and novels,
Linda Rouillard emphasizes connections between medieval and modern
social concerns. Rouillard concludes with a consideration of the
legacy of the incest motif for the twenty-first century, including
survivor narratives, and new incest anxieties associated with
assisted reproductive technology.
How can the Body and Blood of Christ, without ever leaving heaven,
come to be really present on eucharistic altars where the bread and
wine still seem to be? Thirteenth and fourteenth century Christian
Aristotelians thought the answer had to be "transubstantiation."
Acclaimed philosopher, Marilyn McCord Adams, investigates these
later medieval theories of the Eucharist, concentrating on the
writings of Thomas Aquinas, Giles of Rome, Duns Scotus, and William
Ockham, with some reference to Peter Lombard, Hugh of St. Victor,
and Bonaventure. She examines how their efforts to formulate and
integrate this theological datum provoked them to make significant
revisions in Aristotelian philosophical theories regarding the
metaphysical structure and location of bodies, differences between
substance and accidents, causality and causal powers, and
fundamental types of change. Setting these developments in the
theological context that gave rise to the question draws attention
to their understandings of the sacraments and their purpose, as
well as to their understandings of the nature and destiny of human
beings.
Adams concludes that their philosophical modifications were mostly
not ad hoc, but systematic revisions that made room for
transubstantiation while allowing Aristotle still to describe what
normally and naturally happens. By contrast, their picture of the
world as it will be (after the last judgment) seems less well
integrated with their sacramental theology and their understandings
of human nature.
This volume belongs to the critical edition of the complete works
of Francis Bacon (1561-1626), an edition that presents the works in
broadly chronological order and in accordance with the principles
of modern textual scholarship. This volume contains critical
editions of five varied works Bacon composed during the 1620s. The
most significant and substantial of these five works is his
biography of Henry VII (The historie of the raigne of King Henry
the seventh) but the volume testifies as well to Bacon's continuing
robust allegiance to his youthful vaunt that all knowledge was his
province, for it also includes his sketch for a biography of Henry
VIII, An advertisement touching an holy war (a thoughtful debate
over the prospect of holy war in his own time), Apophthegmes (a
lively collection of witty anecdotes, classical to early modern),
and his select verse translations from the psalms. In each case an
authoritative text has been established based upon fresh collation
of the relevant manuscripts and of multiple copies of the
seventeenth-century editions, and subjected to a thorough
bibliographical analysis of the treatment of Bacon's texts in the
early modern printing-house. The Introductions discuss the occasion
and context for each work, evaluate his creative transmutation of
his sources, and weigh their contemporary reception. A
comprehensive commentary identifies and parses Bacon's use of
source material, from his refinement of published literary and
historical sources and contemporary MSS to the political white
papers composed while he served as counsellor to King James. An
extensive glossary is integrated into this commentary. An Appendix
provides full bibliographical descriptions of all of the textual
witnesses, manuscript and printed edition.
|
You may like...
Robert Holcot
John T. Slotemaker, Jeffrey C. Witt
Hardcover
R3,574
Discovery Miles 35 740
|