|
|
Books > Humanities > Religion & beliefs > General > Philosophy of religion > General
Art has always been important for religion or spirituality. Secular
art displayed in museums can also be spiritual, and it is this art
that is the subject of this book. Many of the works of art produced
by Wassily Kandinsky, Mark Rothko, Andy Warhol, and Anselm Kiefer
are spiritual in nature. These works reveal their own spirituality,
which often has no connection to official religions. Wessel Stoker
demonstrates that these artists communicate religious insights
through images and shows how they depict the relationship between
heaven and earth, between this world and a transcendent reality,
thus clearly drawing the contours of the spirituality these works
evince.
In the Name of Friendship: Deguy, Derrida and "Salut" centres on
the relationship between poet Michel Deguy and philosopher Jacques
Derrida. Translations of two essays, "Of Contemporaneity" by Deguy
and "How to Name" by Derrida, allow Christopher Elson and Garry
Sherbert to develop the implications of this singular intellectual
friendship. In these thinkers' efforts to reinvent secular forms of
the sacred, such as the singularity of the name, and especially
poetic naming, Deguy, by adopting a Derridean programme of the
impossible, and Derrida, by developing Deguy's ethics of naming
through the word "salut," situate themselves at the forefront of
contemporary debates over politics and religion alongside figures
like Alain Badiou and Jean-Luc Marion, John Caputo and Martin
Hagglund.
For over twenty years, Beverley Clack and Brian R. Clack's
distinctive and thought-provoking introduction to the philosophy of
religion has been of enormous value to students and scholars,
providing an approach to the subject that is bold and refreshingly
alternative. This revised and updated edition retains the
accessibility which makes the book popular, while furthering its
distinctive argument regarding the human dimension of religion. The
central emphasis of the philosophy of religion - the concept of
God, and the arguments for and against God's existence - is
reflected in thorough analyses, while alternative approaches to
traditional philosophical theism are explored. The treatments of
both the miraculous and immortality have been revised and expanded,
and the concluding chapter updates the investigation of how
philosophy of religion might be conducted in an age defined by
religious terrorism. Clear, systematic and highly critical, the
third edition of The Philosophy of Religion will continue to be
essential reading for students and scholars of this fascinating and
important subject.
What is the nature of Hell? What role(s) may Hell play in
religious, political, or ethical thought? Can Hell be justified?
This edited volume addresses these questions and others; drawing
philosophers from many approaches and traditions to analyze and
examine Hell.
This work argues that philosophy, as multidiciplinary comparative
inquiry, is essential to the contemporary academic study of
religion.
This book offers the first in-depth treatment in English language
of Habermas's long-awaited work on religion, Auch eine Geschichte
der Philosophie, published in 2019. Charting the contingent origins
and turning points of occidental thinking through to the current
"postmetaphysical" stage, the two volumes provide striking insights
into the intellectual streams and conflicts in which core
components of modern self-understanding have been forged. The
encounter of Greek metaphysics with biblical monotheism has led to
a theology of history as salvation, expanding in bold arcs from
Adam's Fall to Christ and the Last Judgement. The reconstruction of
key turns in the relationship between faith and knowledge ends,
however, with locating the uniqueness of religion in "ritual" and
defining reason as inherently secular. The book exposes the sources
and trajectories, analysed by Habermas with great erudition, to
different assessments in biblical studies, theology, and philosophy
of subjectivity. Apart from Paul and Augustine, key lines of
continuity are identified in the Gospels, early patristic theology,
Duns Scotus and Schleiermacher that retain the internal connection
of faith to autonomous freedom.
Many assume falsely that religious disagreements engage rules of
evidence presentation and belief justification radically different
than the ordinary disagreements people have every day, whether
those religious disagreements are in Sri Lanka between Hindus and
Buddhists or in the Middle East among Jews, Christians, and
Muslims.
The issue of whether or not there is a God is one of the oldest and
most widely disputed philosophical questions. It is a debate that
spreads far across the range of philosophical questions about the
status of science, the nature of mind, the character of good and
evil, the epistemology of experience and testimony, and so on. In
this book two philosophers, each committed to unambiguous versions
of belief and disbelief, debate the central issues of atheism and
theism. Smart opens the debate by arguing that theism is
philosophically untenable and seeks to explain metaphysical truth
in the light of total science. Haldane continues the discussion by
affirming that the existence of the world, and the possibility of
our coming to have knowledge of it, depend upon the existence of a
creating, sustaining, personal God. This is followed by replies,
where each philosopher has the chance to respond and to defend his
position. This second edition contains new essays by each
philosopher, responding to criticisms and building on their
previous work.
The Metaphysical Presuppositions of Being-in-the-World brings St.
Thomas Aquinas and Martin Heidegger into dialogue and argues for
the necessity of Christian philosophy. Through the confrontation of
Heideggerian and Thomist thought, it offers an original and
comprehensive rethinking of the nature of temporality and the
origins of metaphysical inquiry. The book is a careful treatment of
the inception and deterioration of the four-fold presuppositions of
Thomistic metaphysics: intentionality, causality, finitude, ananke
stenai. The analysis of the four-fold has never before been done
and it is a central and original contribution of Gilson's book. The
four-fold penetrates the issues between the phenomenological
approach and the metaphysical vision to arrive at their core and
irreconcilable difference. Heidegger's attempt to utilize the
fourfold to extrude theology from ontology provides the necessary
interpretive impetus to revisit the radical and often misunderstood
metaphysics of St. Thomas, through such problems as aeviternity,
non-being and tragedy.
This is the first booklength account of how Maurice Merleau-Ponty
used certain texts by Alfred North Whitehead to develop an ontology
based on nature, and how he could have used other Whitehead texts
that he did not know in order to complete his last ontology. This
account is enriched by several of Merleau-Ponty's unpublished
writings not previously available in English, by the first detailed
treatment of certain works by F.W.J. Schelling in the course of
showing how they exerted a substantial influence on both
Merleau-Ponty and Whitehead, and by the first extensive discussion
of Merleau-Ponty's interest in the Stoics's notion of the twofold
logos-the logos endiathetos and the logos proforikos. This book
provides a thorough exploration of the consonance between these two
philosophers in their mutual desire to overcome various
bifurcations of nature, and of nature from spirit, that continued
to haunt philosophy and science since the 17th-century.
While a number of books and anthologies on Ricoeur's thought have
been published over the past decade, Ricoeur Across the Disciplines
isunique in its multidisciplinary scope. The books currently
available are typically one of either two kinds: either they
provide a general overview of Ricoeur's thought or they focus on a
narrow set of themes within a specific discipline. While other
books may allude to the multidisciplinary potential for Ricoeur's
thought, this book is the first to carry out a truly
multidisciplinary investigation of his work. The aim of this
approach is not only to draw out the nuances of Ricoeur's thought
but also to facilitate a new conversation between Ricoeur scholars
and those working in a variety of domains.
What does it mean to be called to the profession of philosophy?
What does it mean for the Christian in particular? And how should
those called to the profession engage their tasks? Noting that
philosophy literally is "the love of wisdom," Garrett J. DeWeese
begins with a discussion of wisdom from the Old and New Testaments
before addressing the often misunderstood relation between faith
and reason. DeWeese then elucidates the fundamental questions of
metaphysics, epistemology, ethics and aesthetics, philosophy of
mind and philosophy of science, finally making a case for the
integration of philosophy and Christian spiritual formation.
We are used to thinking of words as signs of inner thoughts. In
Outward Signs, Philip Cary argues that Augustine invented this
expressionist semiotics, where words are outward signs expressing
an inward will to communicate, in an epochal departure from ancient
philosopical semiotics, where signs are means of inference, as
smoke is a sign of fire. Augustine uses his new theory of signs to
give an account of Biblical authority, explaining why an
authoritative external teaching is needed in addition to the inward
teaching of Christ as divine Wisdom, which is conceived in terms
drawn from Platonist epistemology. In fact for Augustine we
literally learn nothing from words or any other outward sign,
because the truest form of knowledge is a kind of Platonist vision,
seeing what is inwardly present to the mind. Nevertheless, because
our mind's eye is diseased by sin we need the help of external
signs as admonitions or reminders pointing us in the right
direction, so that we may look and see for ourselves. Even our
knowledge of other persons is ultimately a matter not of trusting
their words but of seeing their minds with our minds. Thus Cary
argues here that, for Augustine, outward signs are useful but
ultimately powerless because no bodily thing has power to convey
something inward to the soul. This means that there can be no such
thing as an efficacious external means of grace. The sacraments,
which Augustine was the first to describe as outward signs of inner
grace, signify what is necessary for salvation but do not confer
it. Baptism, for example, is necessary for salvation, but its power
is found not in water or word but in the inner unity, charity and
peace of the church. Even the flesh of Christ is necessary but not
efficacious, an external sign to use without clinging to it.
The essays in The Philosophy of Spirituality explore a new field in
philosophy. Until recently, most philosophers in the analytic and
continental Western traditions treated spirituality as a religious
concept. Any non-religious spirituality tended to be neglected or
dismissed as irremediably vague. Here, from various philosophical
and cultural perspectives, it is addressed as a subject of
independent interest. This is a philosophical response to
increasing numbers of spiritual but not religious people inhabiting
secular societies and the heightened interaction between a
multitude of spiritual traditions in a globalized age. A
provocative array of approaches (African, Indigenous, Indian,
Stoic, and Sufic perspectives, as well as Western analytic and
continental views) offer fresh insights, many articulated by
emerging voices. Contributors are Mariapaola Bergomi, Moses Biney,
Christopher Braddock, Drew Chastain, Kerem Eksen, Nikolay Milkov,
Roderick Nicholls, Jerry Piven, Heather Salazar, Eric Steinhart,
Richard White, Mark Wynn and Eric Yang.
In his latest book, Terry Eagleton, one of the most celebrated
intellects of our time, considers the least regarded of the
virtues. His compelling meditation on hope begins with a firm
rejection of the role of optimism in life's course. Like its close
relative, pessimism, it is more a system of rationalization than a
reliable lens on reality, reflecting the cast of one's temperament
in place of true discernment. Eagleton turns then to hope, probing
the meaning of this familiar but elusive word: Is it an emotion?
How does it differ from desire? Does it fetishize the future?
Finally, Eagleton broaches a new concept of tragic hope, in which
this old virtue represents a strength that remains even after
devastating loss has been confronted. In a wide-ranging discussion
that encompasses Shakespeare's Lear, Kierkegaard on despair,
Aquinas, Wittgenstein, St. Augustine, Kant, Walter Benjamin's
theory of history, and a long consideration of the prominent
philosopher of hope, Ernst Bloch, Eagleton displays his masterful
and highly creative fluency in literature, philosophy, theology,
and political theory. Hope without Optimism is full of the
customary wit and lucidity of this writer whose reputation rests
not only on his pathbreaking ideas but on his ability to engage the
reader in the urgent issues of life. Page-Barbour Lectures
Drawing on traditions of Jewish biblical commentary, the author
employs the Creation account in Genesis to show how understanding
God's creativity can give us courage to go on when we contemplate a
future of continued trials and failures, because we can reaffirm
that we are created in God's image.
Plants are people too? No, but in this work of philosophical botany
Matthew Hall challenges readers to reconsider the moral standing of
plants, arguing that they are other-than-human persons. Plants
constitute the bulk of our visible biomass, underpin all natural
ecosystems, and make life on Earth possible. Yet plants are
considered passive and insensitive beings rightly placed outside
moral consideration. As the human assault on nature continues, more
ethical behavior toward plants is needed. Hall surveys Western,
Eastern, Pagan, and Indigenous thought as well as modern science
for attitudes toward plants, noting the particular resources for
plant personhood and those modes of thought which most exclude
plants. The most hierarchical systems typically put plants at the
bottom, but Hall finds much to support a more positive view of
plants. Indeed, some indigenous animisms actually recognize plants
as relational, intelligent beings who are the appropriate
recipeints of care and respect. New scientific findings encourage
this perspective, revealing that plants possess many of the
capacities of sentience and mentality traditionally denied them.
|
|