|
|
Books > Humanities > History > Asian / Middle Eastern history > From 1900 > Postwar, from 1945 > General
Afghan women were at the forefront of global agendas in late 2001,
fueled by a mix of media coverage, humanitarian intervention and
military operations. Calls for "liberating" Afghan women were
widespread. Women's roles in Afghanistan have long been politically
divisive, marked by struggles between modernization and tradition.
Women, politics, and the state have always been intertwined in
Afghanistan, and conflicts have been fueled by attempts to
challenge or change women's status. It may appear that we have come
full circle twenty years later, in late 2021, when Afghanistan fell
to the Taliban once more. Women's rights in Afghanistan have been
stripped away, and any gains-however tenuous-now appear lost.
Today, the country navigates both a humanitarian and a human rights
crisis. This book measures the rhetoric of liberation and the
physical and ideological occupations of Afghanistan over the
twenty-year period from 2001 through 2021 through the voices,
perspectives, and experiences of those who are implicated in this
reality-Afghan women.
In Unbound in War?, Sean Richmond examines the influence and
interpretation of international law in the use of force by two
important but understudied countries, Canada and Britain, during
two of the most significant conflicts since 1945, namely the Korean
War and the Afghanistan Conflict. Through innovative application of
sociological theories in International Relations (IR) and
International Law (IL), and rigorous qualitative analysis of
declassified documents and original interviews, the book advances a
two-pronged argument. First, contrary to what some dominant IR
perspectives might predict, international law can play four
underappreciated roles when states use force. It helps constitute
identity, regulate behaviour, legitimate certain actions, and
structure the development of new rules. However, contrary to what
many IL approaches might predict, it is unclear whether these
effects are ultimately attributable to an obligatory quality in
law. This ground-breaking argument promises to advance
interdisciplinary debates and policy discussions in both IR and IL.
This book analyses the problematique of governance and
administration of cultural diversity within the modern state of
Afghanistan and traces patterns of national integration. It
explores state construction in twentieth-century Afghanistan and
Afghan nationalism, and explains the shifts in the state's policies
and societal responses to different forms of governance of cultural
diversity. The book problematizes liberalism, communitarianism, and
multiculturalism as approaches to governance of diversity within
the nation-state. It suggests that while the western models of
multiculturalism have recognized the need to accommodate different
cultures, they failed to engage with them through intercultural
dialogue. It also elaborates the challenge of intra-group diversity
and the problem of accommodating individual choice and freedom
while recognising group rights and adoption of multiculturalism.
The book develops an alternative approach through synthesising
critical multiculturalism and interculturalism as a framework on a
democratic and inclusive approach to governance of diversity. A
major intervention in understanding a war-torn country through an
insider account, this book will be of great interest to scholars
and researchers of politics and international relations, especially
those concerned with multiculturalism, state-building, nationalism,
and liberalism, as well as those in cultural studies, history,
Afghanistan studies, South Asian studies, Middle East studies,
minority studies, and to policymakers.
This pioneering volume navigates cultural memory of the Korean War
through the lens of contemporary arts and film in South Korea for
the last two decades. Cultural memory of the Korean War has been a
subject of persistent controversy in the forging of South Korean
postwar national and ideological identity. Applying the theoretical
notion of "postmemory," this book examines the increasingly
diversified attitudes toward memories of the Korean War and Cold
War from the late 1990s and onward, particularly in the demise of
military dictatorships. Chapters consider efforts from younger
generation artists and filmmakers to develop new ways of
representing traumatic memories by refusing to confine themselves
to the tragic experiences of survivors and victims. Extensively
illustrated, this is one of the first volumes in English to provide
an in-depth analysis of work oriented around such themes from 12
renowned and provocative South Korean artists and filmmakers. This
includes documentary photographs, participatory public arts,
independent women's documentary films, and media installations. The
Korean War and Postmemory Generation will appeal to students and
scholars of film studies, contemporary art, and Korean history.
Drawing on reinterpretations of melancholia and collective
remembrance, Memory, Reconciliation, and Reunions in South Korea:
Crossing the Divide explores the multi-layered implications of
divided Korea's liminality, or its perceived "in-betweenness" in
space and time. Offering a timely reconsideration of the pivotal
period following the inter-Korean Summit of June 2000, this book
focuses on a series of emotionally charged meetings among family
members who had lost all contact for over fifty years on opposite
sides of the Korean divide. With the scope of its analysis ranging
from regional geopolitics and watershed political rituals to
everyday social dynamics and intimate family narratives, this study
provides a lens for approaching the cultural process of moving from
a disposition of enmity to one of recognition and engagement amid
the complex legacies of civil war and the global Cold War on the
Korean Peninsula.
It is August 1990, and Iraq has just invaded Kuwait, setting off a
chain reaction of events leading up to the first Gulf War. Vicki
Cody's husband, the commander of an elite Apache helicopter
battalion, is deployed to Saudi Arabia-and for the next nine months
they have to rely on written letters in order to stay connected.
From Vicki's narrative and journal entries, the reader gets a very
realistic glimpse of what it is like for the spouses and families
back home during a war, in particular what it was like at a time
when most people did not own a personal computer and there was no
Internet-no iPhones, no texting, no tweeting, no Facetime. Her
writing also illuminates the roller coaster of stress, loneliness,
sleepless nights, humor, joys, and, eventually, resilience, that
make up her life while her husband is away. Meanwhile, Dick's
letters to her give the reader a front row seat to the unfolding of
history, the adrenaline rush of flying helicopters in combat, his
commitment to his country, and his devotion to his family back
home. Together, these three components weave a clear, insightful,
and intimate story of love and its power to sustain us.
Comic books have presented fictional and fact-based stories of the
Korean War, as it was being fought and afterward. Comparing these
comics with events that inspired them offers a deeper understanding
of the comics industry, America's "forgotten war," and the
anti-comics movement, championed by psychiatrist Fredric Wertham,
who criticized their brutalization of the imagination. Comics--both
newsstand offerings and government propaganda--used fictions to
justify the unpopular war as necessary and moral. This book
examines the dramatization of events and issues, including the
war's origins, germ warfare, brainwashing, Cold War espionage, the
nuclear threat, African Americans in the military, mistreatment of
POWs, and atrocities.
In recent years questions of ethical responsibility and justice in
war have become increasingly significant in international
relations. This focus has been precipitated by United States (U.S.)
led invasions in Afghanistan and Iraq. In turn, Western conceptions
of ethical responsibility have been largely informed by human
rights based understandings of morality. This book directly
addresses the question of what it means to act ethically in times
of war by drawing upon first-hand accounts of U.S. war fighting in
Iraq during the 2003 invasion and occupation. The book focuses upon
the prominent rights based justification of war of Michael Walzer.
Through an in-depth critical reading of Walzer's work, this title
demonstrates the broader problems implicit to human rights based
justifications of war and elucidates an alternative account of
ethical responsibility: ethics as response. Putting forward a
compelling case for people to remain troubled and engaged with
questions of ethical responsibility in war, this work will be of
great interest to students and scholars in a range of areas
including international relations theory, ethics and security
studies.
Iraq: The Moral Reckoning applies classic just war theory to the
U.S. decision to go to war in 2003. That theory, which evolved over
several millennia, is a simple, profound tool for evaluating the
rightness and wisdom of starting a war. The Bush administration and
its supporters referred directly and indirectly to the theory in
making a pro-war case to the world. The theory provides three core
moral criteria for a just war: sovereign authority, just cause, and
right intention (which includes an aim of peace). It adds three
practical criteria: proportionality of ends, last resort, and
reasonable chance of success. For a just war, each criterion should
be substantially met. Since war is destructive and each country is
presumed to have the right to live in peace, the evidence in favor
of war must be clearly stronger than evidence against it. For each
criterion, Iraq: The Moral Reckoning painstakingly weighs Bush
administration statements, or those of its supporters, against
evidence available at the time. A wide range of viewpoints and
evidence is considered, and contrary arguments are refuted. One
full chapter is given to neoconservative arguments on just war
theory and its application from prominent war supporters. Each
criterion, except sovereign authority, is shown not to have been
met. The book concludes with a discussion of the implications of an
unjust war for the United States and the world. The intensive
weighing of each criterion against the facts and the balanced
approach make the book unique. By demonstrating a comprehensive
application of the theory to one war, it not only sets a new
standard for evaluating the 2003 Iraq war, but also shows how
present and future wars can be better evaluated in moral and
practical terms, based on knowledge available at the time.
 |
Korea
(Hardcover)
Carlos R Smith
|
R563
R517
Discovery Miles 5 170
Save R46 (8%)
|
Ships in 18 - 22 working days
|
|
|
The emerging Jewish national consciousness in Europe toward the end
of the 19th century claims many spiritual fathers, some of which
have been seriously underestimated so far. Zionist intellectuals
such as Moses Hess, Leon Pinsker and Isaac Rulf were already
committed to the self-liberation of the Jewish people long before
Theodor Herzl. Their experiences and observations brought them to
believe that the emancipation and integration of Jews were not
realistically possible in Europe. Instead, they began to think in
national and territorial terms. The author explores the question as
to what extent religious messianism influenced the ideas of these
men and how this reflects in today's collective Israeli
consciousness. In a comprehensive epilogue, Julius H. Schoeps
critically correlates ideas of messianic salvation, Zionist pioneer
ideals, the settler's movement before and after 1967, and the
unsolved conflict between Israelis and Palestinians which has been
lasting for over 100 years.
After the swift defeat of the Taliban in 2001, American optimism
has steadily evaporated in the face of mounting violence; a new
"war of a thousand cuts" has now brought the country to its knees.
In the Graveyard of Empires is a political history of Afghanistan
in the "Age of Terror" from 2001 to 2009, exploring the fundamental
tragedy of America's longest war since Vietnam. After a brief
survey of the great empires in Afghanistan-the campaigns of
Alexander the Great, the British in the era of Kipling, and the
late Soviet Union-Seth G. Jones examines the central question of
our own war: how did an insurgency develop? Following the September
11 attacks, the United States successfully overthrew the Taliban
regime. It established security throughout the country-killing,
capturing, or scattering most of al Qa'ida's senior operatives-and
Afghanistan finally began to emerge from more than two decades of
struggle and conflict. But Jones argues that as early as 2001
planning for the Iraq War siphoned off resources and talented
personnel, undermining the gains that had been made. After eight
years, he says, the United States has managed to push al Qa'ida's
headquarters about one hundred miles across the border into
Pakistan, the distance from New York to Philadelphia. While
observing the tense and often adversarial relationship between NATO
allies in the Coalition, Jones-who has distinguished himself at
RAND and was recently named by Esquire as one of the "Best and
Brightest" young policy experts-introduces us to key figures on
both sides of the war. Harnessing important new research and
integrating thousands of declassified government documents, Jones
then analyzes the insurgency from a historical and structural point
of view, showing how a rising drug trade, poor security forces, and
pervasive corruption undermined the Karzai government, while
Americans abandoned a successful strategy, failed to provide the
necessary support, and allowed a growing sanctuary for insurgents
in Pakistan to catalyze the Taliban resurgence. Examining what has
worked thus far-and what has not-this serious and important book
underscores the challenges we face in stabilizing the country and
explains where we went wrong and what we must do if the United
States is to avoid the disastrous fate that has befallen many of
the great world powers to enter the region.
This book analyses the various ways counterinsurgency in
Afghanistan is gendered. The book examines the US led war in
Afghanistan from 2001 onwards, including the invasion, the
population-centric counterinsurgency operations and the efforts to
train a new Afghan military charged with securing the country when
the US and NATO withdrew their combat forces in 2014. Through an
analysis of key counterinsurgency texts and military memoirs, the
book explores how gender and counterinsurgency are co-constitutive
in numerous ways. It discusses the multiple military masculinities
that counterinsurgency relies on, the discourse of 'cultural
sensitivity', and the deployment of Female Engagement Teams (FETs).
Gendering Counterinsurgency demonstrates how population-centric
counterinsurgency doctrine and practice can be captured within a
gendered dynamic of 'killing and caring' - reliant on physical
violence, albeit mediated through 'armed social work'. This
simultaneously contradictory and complementary dynamic cannot be
understood without recognising how the legitimation and the
practice of this war relied on multiple gendered embodied
performances of masculinities and femininities. Developing the
concept of 'embodied performativity' this book shows how the clues
to understanding counterinsurgency, as well as gendering war more
broadly are found in war's everyday gendered manifestations. This
book will be of much interest to students of counterinsurgency
warfare, gender politics, governmentality, biopolitics, critical
war studies, and critical security studies in general.
Available in paperback for the first time, this book assesses the
strains within the 'Special Relationship' between London and
Washington and offers a new perspective on the limits and successes
of British influence during the Korean War. The interaction between
the main personalities on the British side - Attlee, Bevan,
Morrison, Churchill and Eden - and their American counterparts -
Truman, Acheson, Eisenhower and Dulles - are chronicled. By the end
of the war the British were concerned that it was the Americans,
rather than the Soviets, who were the greater threat to world
peace. British fears concerning the Korean War were not limited to
the diplomatic and military fronts these extended to the
'Manchurian Candidate' threat posed by returning prisoners of war
who had been exposed to communist indoctrination. The book is
essential reading for those interested in British and US foreign
policy and military strategy during the Cold War. -- .
This book analyses the problematique of governance and
administration of cultural diversity within the modern state of
Afghanistan and traces patterns of national integration. It
explores state construction in twentieth-century Afghanistan and
Afghan nationalism, and explains the shifts in the state's policies
and societal responses to different forms of governance of cultural
diversity. The book problematizes liberalism, communitarianism, and
multiculturalism as approaches to governance of diversity within
the nation-state. It suggests that while the western models of
multiculturalism have recognized the need to accommodate different
cultures, they failed to engage with them through intercultural
dialogue. It also elaborates the challenge of intra-group diversity
and the problem of accommodating individual choice and freedom
while recognising group rights and adoption of multiculturalism.
The book develops an alternative approach through synthesising
critical multiculturalism and interculturalism as a framework on a
democratic and inclusive approach to governance of diversity. A
major intervention in understanding a war-torn country through an
insider account, this book will be of great interest to scholars
and researchers of politics and international relations, especially
those concerned with multiculturalism, state-building, nationalism,
and liberalism, as well as those in cultural studies, history,
Afghanistan studies, South Asian studies, Middle East studies,
minority studies, and to policymakers.
This book presents a theory and empirical evidence for how security
forces can identify militant suspects during counterinsurgency
operations. A major oversight on the part of academics and
practitioners has been to ignore the critical antecedent issue
common to persuasion and coercion counterinsurgency (COIN)
approaches: distinguishing friend from foe. This book proposes that
the behaviour of security forces influences the likelihood of
militant identification during a COIN campaign, and argues that
security forces must respect civilian safety in order to create a
credible commitment to facilitate collaboration with a population.
This distinction is important as conventional wisdom has wrongly
assumed that the presence of security forces confers control over
terrain or influence over a population. Collaboration between
civilian and government actors is the key observable indicator of
support in COIN. Paradoxically, this theory accounts for why and
how increased risk to government forces in the short term actually
improves civilian security in the long run. Counterinsurgency,
Security Forces, and the Identification Problem draws on three case
studies: the Huk Rebellion in the Philippines post-World War II;
Marines Corps' experiences in Vietnam through the Combined Action
Program; and Special Operations activities in Iraq after 2003. For
military practitioners, the work illustrates the critical precursor
to establishing "security" during counterinsurgency operations. The
book also examines the role and limits of modern technology in
solving the identification problem. This book will be of interest
to students of counterinsurgency, military history, strategic
studies, US foreign policy, and security studies in general.
Darkly funny, shockingly honest, Brothers in Arms is an
unforgettable account of a soldier's tour of Afghanistan, the
brutal reality of war - every scary, exciting moment - and the
bonds of friendship that can never be destroyed. 'If you could
choose which two limbs got blown off, what would you go for?' Danny
said. 'Your arms or your legs?' In July 2009, Geraint (Gez) Jones
was sitting in Camp Bastion, Afghanistan with the rest of The Firm
- Danny, Jay, Toby and Jake, his four closest friends, all junior
NCOs and combat-hardened infantrymen. Thanks to the mangled remains
of a Jackal vehicle left tactlessly outside their tent, IEDs were
never far from their mind. Within days they'd be on the ground in
Musa Qala with the rest of 3 Platoon - a mixed bunch of men Gez
would die for. As they fight furiously, are pushed to their limits,
hemmed in by IEDs and hampered by the chain of command, Gez starts
to wonder what is the point of it all. The bombs they uncover on
patrol, on their stomachs brushing the sand away, are replaced the
next day. Firefights are a momentary victory in a war they can see
is unwinnable. Gez is a warrior - he wants more than this. But then
death and injury start to take their toll on The Firm, leaving Gez
with PTSD and a new battle just beginning. 'Jones writes of his
brothers and their Afghan experience, from its adrenalin-filled
highs to the many lows, with passion and candour.' - Major Adam
Jowett, bestselling author of No Way Out 'A gritty, brutal book
about men at war. Raw and real. Brilliant.' - Tom Marcus, author of
Soldier Spy
*NOW UPDATED WITH EXTRA MATERIAL* The boy who fled Afghanistan and
endured a terrifying journey in the hands of people smugglers is
now a young man intent on changing the world. His story is a deeply
harrowing and incredibly inspiring tale of our times. Gulwali
Passarlay was sent away from Afghanistan at the age of twelve,
after his father was killed in a gun battle with the US Army. He
made a twelve-month odyssey across Europe, spending time in
prisons, suffering hunger, making a terrifying journey across the
Mediterranean in a tiny boat, and enduring a desolate month in the
camp at Calais. Somehow he survived, and made it to Britain, where
he was fostered, sent to school, and won a place at a top
university. He was chosen to carry the Olympic torch in 2012. One
boy's experience is the central story of our times. This powerful
memoir celebrates the triumph of courage over adversity.
Tyler E. Boudreau is a twelve-year veteran of the Marine Corps
infantry. He trained and committed himself physically and
intellectually to the military life. Then his intense devotion
began to disintegrate, bit by bit, during his final mission in
Iraq. After returning home, he discovered a turmoil developing in
his mind, estranging him from his loved ones and the bill of goods
he eagerly purchased as a marine officer."Packing Inferno "is the
spectacularly written story of the ordeal of a marine officer in
battle and then coming home. It is the struggle with a society
resistant to understand the true nature of war. It is the fight
with combat stress and an exploration into the process of recovery.
It is the search for conscience, family, and ultimately for one's
essential self. Here are the reflections of a man built by the
Marine Corps, disassembled by war, and left with no guidance to
rebuild himself.This is Tyler E. Boudreau's first book. He
currently lives in western Massachusetts, where he works with other
veterans on many projects related to war.
It was 2006, and eight hundred soldiers from the Canadian Armed
Forces (CAF) base in pseudonymous "Armyville," Canada, were
scheduled to deploy to Kandahar. Many students in the Armyville
school district were destined to be affected by this and several
subsequent deployments. These deployments, however, represented
such a new and volatile situation that the school district
lacked--as indeed most Canadians lacked--the understanding required
for an optimum organizational response. Growing Up in Armyville
provides a close-up look at the adolescents who attended Armyville
High School (AHS) between 2006 and 2010. How did their mental
health compare with that of their peers elsewhere in Canada? How
were their lives affected by the Afghanistan mission--at home, at
school, among their friends, and when their parents returned with
post-traumatic stress disorder? How did the youngsters cope with
the stress? What did their efforts cost them? Based on questions
from the National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth,
administered to all youth attending AHS in 2008, and on in-depth
interviews with sixty-one of the youth from CAF families, this book
provides some answers. It also documents the partnership that
occurred between the school district and the authors' research
team. Beyond its research findings, this pioneering book considers
the past, present, and potential role of schools in supporting
children who have been affected by military deployments. It also
assesses the broader human costs to CAF families of their enforced
participation in the volatile overseas missions of the twenty-first
century.
This book investigates the origins of the North Korean garrison
state by examining the development of the Korean People's Army and
the legacies of the Korean War. Despite its significance, there are
very few books on the Korean People's Army with North Korean
primary sources being difficult to access. This book, however,
draws on North Korean documents and North Korean veterans'
testimonies, and demonstrates how the Korean People's Army and the
Korean War shaped North Korea into a closed, militarized and
xenophobic garrison state and made North Korea seek Juche (Self
Reliance) ideology and weapons of mass destruction. This book
maintains that the youth and lower classes in North Korea
considered the Korean People's Army as a positive opportunity for
upward social mobility. As a result, the North Korean regime
secured its legitimacy by establishing a new class of social elites
wherein they offered career advancements for persons who had little
standing and few opportunities under the preceding Japanese
dominated regime. These new elites from poor working and peasant
families became the core supporters of the North Korean regime
today. In addition, this book argues that, in the aftermath of the
Korean War, a culture of victimization was established among North
Koreans which allowed Kim Il Sung to use this culture of fear to
build and maintain the garrison state. Thus, this work illustrates
how the North Korean regime has garnered popular support for the
continuation of a militarized state, despite the great hardships
the people are suffering. This book will be of much interest to
students of North Korea, the Korean War, Asian politics, Cold War
Studies, military and strategic studies, and international history.
'A fast-paced, thrilling account of British heroism, brave men
surrounded and fighting against overwhelming odds. This is the
real, sometimes shocking, and deeply personal story of modern
warfare and PTSD.' Andy McNab 'This hugely timely book reveals in
gripping detail the personal stories of its hidden victims - lest
we forget.' Damien Lewis Trapped in an isolated outpost on the edge
of the Helmand desert, a small force of British and Afghan soldiers
is holding out against hundreds of Taliban fighters. Under brutal
siege conditions, running low on food and ammunition, he
experiences the full horror of combat. As the casualties begin to
mount and the enemy closes in, Evans finds both his leadership and
his belief in the war severely tested. Returning home, he is
haunted by the memories of Afghanistan. He can't move on and his
life begins to spin out of control. Under the Bearskin was
previously published as Code Black.
|
|