| 
				
			 | 
			
				 Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Political ideologies 
				
					
						
						
							
							
								
	
	
	
		
			
				
			
	
 
			
			
				Corn Crusade: Khrushchev's Farming Revolution in the Post-Stalin
Soviet Union is the first history of Nikita Khrushchev's venture to
cover the Soviet Union in corn, a crop common globally but hitherto
rare in his country. Lasting from 1953 until 1964, this crusade was
an emblematic component of his efforts to resolve agrarian crises
inherited from Joseph Stalin. Using policies and propaganda to
pressure farms to expand corn plantings tenfold, Khrushchev
expected the resulting bounty to feed not people, but the livestock
necessary to produce the meat and dairy products required to make
good on his frequent pledges that the Soviet Union was soon to
"catch up to and surpass America." This promised to enrich
citizens' hitherto monotonous diets and score a victory in the Cold
War, which was partly recast as a "peaceful competition" between
communism and capitalism. Khrushchev's former comrades derided corn
as one of his "harebrained schemes" when ousting him in October
1964. Echoing them, scholars have ridiculed it as an "irrational
obsession," blaming the failure on climatic conditions. Corn
Crusade brings a more complex and revealing history to light.
Borrowing technologies from the United States, Khrushchev expected
farms in the Soviet Union to increase productivity because he
believed that innovations developed under capitalism promised
greater returns under socialism. These technologies generated
results in many economic, social, and climatic contexts after World
War II but fell short in the Soviet Union. Attempting to make
agriculture more productive and ameliorate exploitative labor
practices established in the 1930s, Khrushchev achieved only
partial reform of rural economic life. Enjoying authority over
formal policy, Khrushchev stood atop an undisciplined hierarchy of
bureaucracies, local authorities, and farmworkers. Weighing
competing incentives, they flouted his authority by doing enough to
avoid penalties, but too little to produce even modest harvests of
corn, let alone the bumper crops the leader envisioned.
			
		  
	 
	
 
							
							
								
							
							
								
	
	
	
		
			
				
			
	
 
			
			
				This book explores the origins, conduct, and failure of Greek
Cypriot nationalists to achieve the unification of Cyprus with
Greece. Andrew Novo addresses the anti-colonial struggle in the
context of: the competition for the nationalist narrative in Cyprus
between the Left and Right, the duelling Greek-Cypriot and
Turkish-Cypriot nationalisms in Cyprus, the role of Turkey and
Greece in the conflict on the island, and the concerns of the
British Empire during its retrenchment following the Second World
War. More than a narrative history of the period, an analysis of
British policy, or a description of counter-insurgency operations,
this book lays out an examination of the underpinnings of the
enosis cause and its manifestation in action. It argues that the
strategic myopia of the enosis movement shackled the cause, defined
its conduct, and was the primary reason for its failure. Divided
and occupied, Cyprus, and the world, deal with its unresolved
legacy to this day.
			
		  
	 
	
 
							
							
								
	
	
	
		
			
				
			
	
 
			
			
				
This is the first comprehensive volume to offer a state of the art
investigation both of the nature of political ideologies and of
their main manifestations. The diversity of ideology studies is
represented by a mixture of the range of theories that illuminate
the field, combined with an appreciation of the changing complexity
of concrete ideologies and the emergence of new ones. Ideologies,
however, are always with us. The Handbook is divided into three
sections: The first reflects some of the latest thinking about the
development of ideology on an historical dimension, from the
standpoints of conceptual history, Marx studies, social science
theory and history, and leading schools of continental philosophy.
The second includes some of the most recent interpretations and
theories of ideology, all of which are sympathetic in their own
ways to its exploration and close investigation, even when
judiciously critical of its social impact. This section contains
many of the more salient contemporary accounts of ideology. The
third focuses on the leading ideological families and traditions,
as well as on some of their cultural and geographical
manifestations, incorporating both historical and contemporary
perspectives. Each chapter is written by an expert in their field,
bringing the latest approaches and understandings to their task.
The Handbook will position the study of ideologies in the
mainstream of political theory and political analysis and will
attest to its indispensability both to courses on political theory
and to scholars who wish to take their understanding of ideologies
in new directions.
			
		  
	 
	
 
							
							
								
							
							
								
	
	
	
		
			
				
			
	
 
			
			
				This volume offers a comparative survey of diverse settler colonial
experiences in relation to food, food culture and foodways - how
the latter are constructed, maintained, revolutionised and, in some
cases, dissolved. What do settler colonial foodways and food
cultures look like? Are they based on an imagined colonial
heritage, do they embrace indigenous repertoires or invent new
hybridised foodscapes? What are the socio-economic and political
dynamics of these cultural transformations? In particular, this
volume focuses on three key issues: the evolution of settler
colonial identities and states; their relations vis-a-vis
indigenous populations; and settlers' self-indigenisation - the
process through which settlers transform themselves into the native
population, at least in their own eyes. These three key issues are
crucial in understanding settler-indigenous relations and the rise
of settler colonial identities and states.
			
		  
	 
	
 
							
							
								
							
							
								
	
	
	
		
			
				
			
	
 
			
			
				A compelling explanation of how conservatism is no longer what its
founders intended and how it has been transformed into a tool of
materialist economics and emptied of much of its original meaning.
During America's 19th-century Gilded Age, free-enterprise
capitalist ideas distorted and deeply obscured traditional
political conservatism. Conservatism today, argues distinguished
historian Mario R. DiNunzio, is a grotesque version of the ideology
crafted by its founders, including John Adams in America and Edmund
Burke in England. This compelling book provides a survey of
conservative thought and its transformation that originated in the
late 19th century, exposing the influence of that transformed
conservatism on 20th-century American politics—from Hoover to
Goldwater to Reagan and on to the Tea Party. It explains the
historical foundations of conservative thought and the radical
transformation of conservatism into a vastly different ideology
primarily concerned with the defense of unfettered capitalism and
extreme rights of individuals, as opposed to the values of
traditional conservatism: community, good order, tempered change,
and enduring values. DiNunzio challenges conservatives and scholars
of conservatism to confront the differences between what passes for
conservatism in modern-day American politics and the tenets of the
original conservative tradition.
			
		  
	 
	
 
							
							
								
							
							
								
	
	
	
		
			
				
			
	
 
			
			
				From campus protests to the Congress floor, the central feature of
contemporary American politics is ideological polarization. In this
concise, readable, but comprehensive text, Steven E. Schier and
Todd E. Eberly introduce students to this contentious subject
through an in-depth look at the ideological foundations of the
contemporary American political machine of parties, politicians,
the media, and the public. Beginning with a redefinition of
contemporary liberalism and conservatism, the authors develop a
comprehensive examination of ideology in all branches of American
national and state governments. Investigations into ideologies
reveal a seeming paradox of a representative political system
defined by ever growing divisions and a public that continues to
describe itself as politically moderate. The work's breadth makes
it a good candidate for a course introducing American politics,
while its institutional focus makes it suitable for adoption in
more advanced courses on Congress, the Presidency, the courts or
political parties.
			
		  
	 
	
 
							
							
								
	
	
	
		
			
				
			
	
 
			
			
				Investigating 20th century Chinese ideology through the two main
elements of passionate belief and cultivation of rage, this timely
book examines how Maoist thinking has influenced Western politics.
Tracing the origins of Maoist ideas in Western politics, David
Martin Jones and M.L.R. Smith expertly apply the principles of
strategic theory to provide an understanding of how Mao's ideas
made their way from China into Western societies where they exert a
profound and little understood impact on contemporary political
conduct. The book offers critical insights into key theoretical
discourses and their practical applications, including: Maoism,
Orientalism and post-colonial discourse theory, Maoism and the
mind, and Maoism and the politics of passion. Forward-thinking in
its approach, it addresses the important question of where Maoism
will end, analysing the trajectory that Maoism is likely to take
and what the cumulative impact of it upon Western societies may be.
This invigorating read will be a fascinating resource for scholars
of political theory and history wishing to gain an insight into the
impact of Maoist ideas in the West. It will also provide students
of international politics and international studies with a much
greater understanding of China's revolutionary thinking in world
politics. 'This insightful volume exposes the influence of Maoism
on left wing intellectuals in the West. Jones and Smith reveal how
not just Mao's thought but the anti-democratic and often inhumane
practices that came to be associated with China's Cultural
Revolution are today being rehabilitated in woke form. This superb
book is a must-read for anyone wanting to understand what lies
behind today's dominant political trends.' - Joanna Williams,
Founder and Director of Cieo, UK
			
		  
	 
	
 
							
							
								
	
	
	
		
			
				
			
	
 
			
			
				Although most people believe that some form of government is
necessary, until recently it was merely an assumption that had
never been analyzed from an economic point of view. This changed in
the 1970s when economists at the Center for the Study of Public
Choice engaged in a systematic exploration of the issue. This
stimulating collection, the first book-length treatment on the
public choice theory of government, continues and extends the
research program begun more than three decades ago. The book
reprints the main articles from the 1972 volume Explorations in the
Theory of Anarchy, and contains a response to each chapter, as well
as new comments by Gordon Tullock, James Buchanan, Jeffrey Rogers
Hummel and Peter Boettke. The younger economists are notably less
pessimistic about markets and more pessimistic about government
than their predecessors. Much of the new analysis suggests that
private property rights and contracts can exist without government,
and that even though problems exist, government does not seem to
offer a solution. Might anarchy be the best choice after all? This
provocative volume explores this issue in-depth and provides some
interesting answers. Economists, political scientists, philosophers
and lawyers interested in public choice, political economy and
spontaneous order will find this series of essays illuminating.
			
		  
	 
	
 
							
							
								
	
	
	
		
			
				
			
	
 
			
			
				Sicker asserts that the Mosaic canon, the Pentateuch, is first
and foremost a library of essentially political teachings and
documents, and that the first eleven chapters of the book of
"Genesis" set forth in essence a general Mosaic political
philosophy. These writings take a unique mythopoeic approach to the
construction of a normative political theory intended to undergird
the idea of a mutual covenant between God and the people of Israel
that is to be realized in history in the creation of the ideal
society. It is with the elaboration of the political ideas
reflected in these early chapters of "Genesis" that this book is
concerned. 
For the modern reader, the biblical texts should be understood
as postulating some basic ideas of Mosaic moral and political
philosophy that, in Sicker's view, continue to be applicable in
contemporary times. First, man is endowed with free will, however
constrained by circumstances it may be, and with the intellect to
govern and direct it in appropriate paths. Accordingly, he is
individually responsible for his actions and must be held
accountable for them. Second, man has a necessary relation to God
whether he wishes it or not. Prudence alone will therefore dictate
that compliance with divine precept is in man's best interest.
Third, the notion that man can create a moral society without
reference to God is a deceptive illusion. Man's ability to
rationalize even his most outrageous behavior clearly indicates the
need for an unimpeachable source and standard of moral authority.
Fourth, until all men accept the preceding principles, the idea of
a universal state is both dangerous and counterproductive. In the
20th century, we have witnessed two different attempts to create
such a world state, both of which produced totalitarian
monstrosities. Fifth, individualism as a social philosophy tends to
be destructive of traditional values and must be tempered by the
idea of communal responsibility. A survey of particular interest to
scholars, researchers, and students interested in Jewish history,
political thought, and the Old Testament. 
			
		 
	 
	
 
							
							
								
							
							
								
							
							
								
	
	
	
		
			
				
			
	
 
			
			
				That the idea of world revolution was crucial for the Bolshevik
leaders in the years following the 1917 revolution is a well-known
fact. But what did the party's rank and file make of it? How did it
resonate with the general population? And what can a social history
of international solidarity tell us about the transformation of
Soviet society from NEP to Stalinism? This book undertakes the
first in-depth analysis of the discourses and practices of
internationalism in early Soviet society during the years of
revolution, civil war and NEP, using forgotten archival materials
and contemporary sources.
			
		  
	 
	
 
							
							
								
	
	
	
		
			
				
			
	
 
			
			
				Elgar Research Agendas outline the future of research in a given
area. Leading scholars are given the space to explore their subject
in provocative ways, and map out the potential directions of
travel. They are relevant but also visionary. At a time when
neoliberalism has become an accepted term in public debate to refer
to the current state of modern societies and their political
economies, Kean Birch critically analyses the conflicting theories
that shape our understanding of 'neoliberalism'. With an
ever-expanding variety of perspectives on the concept of
neoliberalism, it is increasingly difficult to identify any
commonalities. This book explores how different people understand
neoliberalism, and the contradictions in thinking of neoliberalism
as a market-based ethic, project, or order. Detailing the
intellectual history of 'neoliberal' thought, the variety of
critical approaches and the many analytical ambiguities, Kean Birch
presents a new way to conceptualize contemporary political economy
and offers potential avenues for future research through a
judicious exploration of 'neoliberal' practices, processes, and
institutions. This work will be an essential resource for
undergraduate and postgraduate students, scholars, and researchers
to critically assess the concept of neoliberalism across many
disciplines. The book will also serve as a general introduction to
a wider audience interested in the term 'neoliberalism', its
potential pitfalls, and its contested future.
			
		  
	 
	
 
							
							
								
							
							
								
	
	
	
		
			
				
			
	
 
			
			
				
Since the 1920s, Socialist and Communist parties in Europe and
elsewhere have engaged in episodes of both rivalry and cooperation,
with each seeking to dominate the European Left. Enemy Brothers
analyzes how this relationship has developed over the past century,
focusing on France, Italy, and Spain, where Socialists and
Communists have been politically important. Drawing on fieldwork
and interviews in all three nations, W. Rand Smith identifies the
critical junctures that these parties faced and the strategic
choices they made, especially regarding alliance partners. In
explaining the parties' diverse alliance strategies, Enemy Brothers
stresses the impact of institutional arrangements, party culture,
and leadership.
			
		  
	 
	
 
							
							
								
							
							
								
	
	
	
		
			
				
			
	
 
			
			
				In and out of the Maasai Steppe looks at the Maasai women in the
Maasai Steppe of Tanzania. The book explores their current plight -
threatened by climate change - in the light of colonial history and
post-independence history of land seizures. The book documents the
struggles of a group of women to develop new livelihood income
through their traditional beadwork. Voices of the women are shared
as they talk about how it feels to share their husband with many
co-wives, and the book examines gender, their beliefs, social
hierarchy, social changes and in particular the interface between
the Maasai and colonials.
			
		  
	 
	
 
							
							
								
							
							
								
	
	
	
		
			
				
			
	
 
			
			
				Indonesia has long been hailed as a rare case of democratic
transition and persistence in an era of global democratic setbacks.
But as the country enters its third decade of democracy, such
laudatory assessments have become increasingly untenable. The
stagnation that characterized Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono's second
presidential term has given way to a more far-reaching pattern of
democratic regression under his successor, Joko Widodo. This volume
is the first comprehensive study of Indonesia's contemporary
democratic decline. Its contributors identify, explain and debate
the signs of regression, including arbitrary state crackdowns on
freedom of speech and organization, the rise of vigilantism,
deepening political polarization, populist mobilization, the
dysfunction of key democratic institutions, and the erosion of
checks and balances on executive power. They ask why Indonesia,
until recently considered a beacon of democratic exceptionalism,
increasingly conforms to the global pattern of democracy in
retreat.
			
		  
	 
	
 
							
							
								
							
							
								
							
							
							
						
					
					
					
					
				 
			 | 
			
				
	 
			 |