|
Books > Arts & Architecture > The arts: general issues > Theory of art
This book continues the series Contemporary Philosophy
(International Institute of Philosophy), which surveys significant
trends in contemporary philosophy. The new volume on Aesthetics,
comprising nineteen surveys, shows the variety of approaches to
Aesthetics in various cultures. The close connection between
aesthetics and religion and between aesthetics and ethics is
emphasized in several contributions.
This elegantly written book explores the tension between the theory
and practice of art, taking issue with the approaches of the New
Art History and its deconstructionist critics. It critically
examines influential social theories of art from the viewpoint of
the artworlds they target and, through a consideration of work by
Rorty, Bauman, Gadamer and others, develops a new and fruitful set
of connections between ethical, social and art theory that gives
central importance to reflexivity as a living and problematic, as
well as a theoretical, concept.
"Using an approach deeply informed by philosophy of art, art
history and perceptual psychology, this book places seeing at the
centre of an original theory of pictorial representation and
explores the ramifications such a theory has for the visual arts"--
Sociology has taken a recent and unexpected theological turn that
has radical implications for reflexivity. This original study
explores these in four areas: visual aspects of reflexivity and
theology; Simmel and Mauss on prayer as a form of spiritual
capital; identity and the constitution of character; and finally,
and most controversially, a reflection on sociological expectations
of theology. This is one of the few works that explores a new
terrain with profound implications for sociology and theology.
Rejection and Disaffiliation in Twenty-First Century American
Immigration Narratives examines changing attitudes about national
sovereignty and affiliation. Katie Daily delinks twenty-first
century American immigration narratives from 9/11, examining genre
alterations within a scope of literary analysis that is wider than
what "post-9/11" allows. What emerges is an understanding of the
speed at which the rhetoric and aims of many twenty-first century
immigration narratives significantly depart from the traditions
established post-1900. Daily investigates a recent trend in which
novelists and filmmakers question what it means to be an immigrant
in contemporary America and explores how these "disaffiliation"
narratives challenge some of the most fundamental traditions in
American literature and society.
This book argues that journalism should treat itself as an academic
discipline on a par with history, geography and sociology, and as
an art form in its own right. Time, space, social relations and
imagination are intrinsic to journalism. Chris Nash takes the major
flaws attributed to journalism by its critics-a crude empiricism
driven by an un-reflexive 'news sense'; a narrow focus on a
de-contextualised, transient present; and a too intimate
familiarity with powerful sources-and treats them as methodological
challenges. Drawing on the conceptual frameworks of Pierre
Bourdieu, David Harvey, Henri Lefebvre, Michel-Rolph Trouillot and
Gaye Tuchman, he explores the ways in which rigorous journalism
practice can be theorised to meet these challenges. The argument
proceeds through detailed case studies of work by two leading
iconoclasts-the artist Hans Haacke and the 20th century journalist
I.F. Stone. This deeply provocative and original study concludes
that the academic understanding of journalism is fifty years behind
its practice, and that it is long past time for scholars and
practitioners to think about journalism as a disciplinary research
practice. Drawing on an award-winning professional career and over
three decades teaching journalism practice and theory, Chris Nash
makes these ideas accessible to a broad readership among scholars,
graduate students and thoughtful journalists looking for ways to
expand the intellectual range of their work.
This edited monograph provides a compelling analysis of the
interplay between neuroscience and aesthetics. The book broaches a
wide spectrum of topics including, but not limited to, mathematics
and creator algorithms, neurosciences of artistic creativity,
paintings and dynamical systems as well as computational research
for architecture. The international authorship is genuinely
interdisciplinary and the target audience primarily comprises
readers interested in transdisciplinary research between
neuroscience and the broad field of aesthetics.
This is the first book on brain-computer interfaces (BCI) that aims
to explain how these BCI interfaces can be used for artistic goals.
Devices that measure changes in brain activity in various regions
of our brain are available and they make it possible to investigate
how brain activity is related to experiencing and creating art.
Brain activity can also be monitored in order to find out about the
affective state of a performer or bystander and use this knowledge
to create or adapt an interactive multi-sensorial (audio, visual,
tactile) piece of art. Making use of the measured affective state
is just one of the possible ways to use BCI for artistic
expression. We can also stimulate brain activity. It can be evoked
externally by exposing our brain to external events, whether they
are visual, auditory, or tactile. Knowing about the stimuli and the
effect on the brain makes it possible to translate such external
stimuli to decisions and commands that help to design, implement,
or adapt an artistic performance, or interactive installation.
Stimulating brain activity can also be done internally. Brain
activity can be voluntarily manipulated and changes can be
translated into computer commands to realize an artistic vision.
The chapters in this book have been written by researchers in
human-computer interaction, brain-computer interaction,
neuroscience, psychology and social sciences, often in cooperation
with artists using BCI in their work. It is the perfect book for
those seeking to learn about brain-computer interfaces used for
artistic applications.
There is no soundtrack is a study of how sound and image produce
meaning in contemporary experimental media art by artists ranging
from Chantal Akerman to Nam June Paik to Tanya Tagaq. It
contextualises these works and artists through key ideas in sound
studies: voice, noise, listening, the soundscape and more. The book
argues that experimental media art produces radical and new
audio-visual relationships challenging the visually dominated
discourses in art, media and the human sciences. In addition to
directly addressing what Jonathan Sterne calls 'visual hegemony',
it also explores the lack of diversity within sound studies by
focusing on practitioners from transnational and diverse
backgrounds. As such, it contributes to a growing interdisciplinary
scholarship, building new, more complex and reverberating
frameworks to collectively sonify the study of culture. -- .
Reviews of Not Saussure and The Explicit Animal: Not Saussure - 'I
greatly enjoyed it...' - Bernard Bergonzi 'The Explicit Animal -
'...his books are genuine contributions to professional debate...'
- Stephen R.L. Clarke, Times Literary Supplement;Newton's Sleep
examines the complementary roles of science and art in human life.
Science has been criticised for being at best useful but
spiritually derelict, and art for attempting to answer the
spiritual needs of humankind while ignoring the material needs of
millions who live in want. Newton's Sleep deals with the charges
that science is spiritually empty and that art fails in its
civilising mission by relating these aspects of human culture to
the physical and metaphysical hungers of an explicit animal who
lives in both the Kingdom of Means and the Kingdom of Ends. 'Tallis
can, and frequently does, write extremely well. He also writes with
considerable passion...Tallis...is perhaps best seen as an
exceptionally interesting and broad-minded heir to Huxley,
preaching the cause of the Church Scientific...' Richard Webster
This review of literature on perspective constructions from the
Renaissance through the 18th century covers 175 authors,
emphasizing Peiro della Francesca, Guidobaldo del Monte, Simon
Stevin, Brook Taylor, and Johann Heinrich. It treats such topics as
the various methods of constructing perspective, the development of
theories underlying the constructions, and the communication
between mathematicians and artisans in these developments.
Art and Pornography presents a series of essays which investigate
the artistic status and aesthetic dimension of pornographic
pictures, films, and literature, and explores the distinction, if
there is any, between pornography and erotic art. Is there any
overlap between art and pornography, or are the two mutually
exclusive? If they are, why is that? If they are not, how might we
characterize pornographic art or artistic pornography, and how
might pornographic art be distinguished, if at all, from erotic
art? Can there be aesthetic experience of pornography? What are
some of the psychological, social, and political consequences of
the creation and appreciation of erotic art or artistic
pornography? Leading scholars from around the world address these
questions, and more, and bring together different aesthetic
perspectives and approaches to this widely consumed, increasingly
visible, yet aesthetically underexplored cultural domain. The book,
the first of its kind in philosophical aesthetics, will contribute
to a more accurate and subtle understanding of the many
representations that incorporate explicit sexual imagery and
themes, in both high art and demotic culture, in Western and
non-Western contexts. It is sure to stir debate, and healthy
controversy.
Taking as its point of departure Roland Barthes' classic series of
essays, Mythologies, Rebecca Houze presents an exploration of signs
and symbols in the visual landscape of postmodernity. In nine
chapters Houze considers a range of contemporary phenomena, from
the history of sustainability to the meaning of sports and
children's building toys. Among the ubiquitous global trademarks
she examines are BP, McDonald's, and Nike. What do these icons say
to us today? What political and ideological messages are hidden
beneath their surfaces? Taking the idea of myth in its broadest
sense, the individual case studies employ a variety of analytic
methods derived from linguistics, psychoanalysis, anthropology,
sociology, and art history. In their eclecticism of approach they
demonstrate the interdisciplinarity of design history and design
studies. Just as Barthes' meditations on culture concentrated on
his native France, New Mythologies is rooted in the author's
experience of living and teaching in the United States. Houze's
reflections encompass both contemporary American popular culture
and the history of American industry, with reference to such
foundational figures as Thomas Jefferson and Walt Disney. The
collection provides a point of entry into today's complex
postmodern or post-postmodern world, and suggests some ways of
thinking about its meanings, and the lessons we might learn from
it.
Artistic practices have long been disturbing the relationships
between art and space. They have challenged the boundaries of
performer/spectator, of public/private, introduced intervention and
installation, ephemerality and performance, and constantly sought
out new modes of distressing expectations about what is construed
as art. But when we expand the world in which we look at art, how
does this change our understanding of critical artistic practice?
This book presents a global perspective on the relationship between
art and the city. International and leading scholars and artists
themselves present critical theory and practice of contemporary art
as a politicised force. It extends thinking on contemporary arts
practices in the urban and political context of protest and social
resilience and offers the prism of a 'critical artscape' in which
to view the urgent interaction of arts and the urban politic. The
global appeal of the book is established through the general topic
as well as the specific chapters, which are geographically,
socially, politically and professionally varied. Contributing
authors come from many different institutional and
anti-institutional perspectives from across the world. This will be
valuable reading for those interested in cultural geography, urban
geography and urban culture, as well as contemporary art theorists,
practitioners and policymakers.
Representation is a concern crucial to the sciences and the arts
alike. Scientists devote substantial time to devising and exploring
representations of all kinds. From photographs and
computer-generated images to diagrams, charts, and graphs; from
scale models to abstract theories, representations are ubiquitous
in, and central to, science. Likewise, after spending much of the
twentieth century in proverbial exile as abstraction and Formalist
aesthetics reigned supreme, representation has returned with a
vengeance to contemporary visual art. Representational photography,
video and ever-evolving forms of new media now figure prominently
in the globalized art world, while this "return of the real" has
re-energized problems of representation in the traditional media of
painting and sculpture. If it ever really left, representation in
the arts is certainly back. Central as they are to science and art,
these representational concerns have been perceived as different in
kind and as objects of separate intellectual traditions. Scientific
modeling and theorizing have been topics of heated debate in
twentieth century philosophy of science in the analytic tradition,
while representation of the real and ideal has never moved far from
the core humanist concerns of historians of Western art. Yet, both
of these traditions have recently arrived at a similar impasse.
Thinking about representation has polarized into oppositions
between mimesis and convention. Advocates of mimesis understand
some notion of mimicry (or similarity, resemblance or imitation) as
the core of representation: something represents something else if,
and only if, the former mimics the latter in some relevant way.
Such mimetic views stand in stark contrast to conventionalist
accounts of representation, which see voluntary and arbitrary
stipulation as the core of representation. Occasional exceptions
only serve to prove the rule that mimesis and convention govern
current thinking about representation in both analytic philosophy
of science and studies of visual art. This conjunction can hardly
be dismissed as a matter of mere coincidence. In fact, researchers
in philosophy of science and the history of art have increasingly
found themselves trespassing into the domain of the other
community, pilfering ideas and approaches to representation.
Cognizant of the limitations of the accounts of representation
available within the field, philosophers of science have begun to
look outward toward the rich traditions of thinking about
representation in the visual and literary arts. Simultaneously,
scholars in art history and affiliated fields like visual studies
have come to see images generated in scientific contexts as not
merely interesting illustrations derived from "high art", but as
sophisticated visualization techniques that dynamically challenge
our received conceptions of representation and aesthetics. "Beyond
Mimesis and Convention: Representation in Art and Science" is
motivated by the conviction that we students of the sciences and
arts are best served by confronting our mutual impasse and by
recognizing the shared concerns that have necessitated our covert
acts of kleptomania. Drawing leading contributors from the
philosophy of science, the philosophy of literature, art history
and visual studies, our volume takes its brief from our title. That
is, these essays aim to put the evidence of science and of art to
work in thinking about representation by offering third (or fourth,
or fifth) ways beyond mimesis and convention. In so doing, our
contributors explore a range of topics-fictionalism,
exemplification, neuroaesthetics, approximate truth-that build upon
and depart from ongoing conversations in philosophy of science and
studies of visual art in ways that will be of interest to both
interpretive communities. To put these contributions into context,
the remainder of this introduction aims to survey how our
communities have discretely arrived at a place wherein the
perhaps-surprising collaboration between philosophy of science and
art history has become not only salubrious, but a matter of
necessity.
Marie Laurencin, in spite of the noticeable reputation she made in
Paris in the first half of the twentieth century, has attracted
only sporadic attention by late-twentieth century art historians.
Until now the substance of her art and the feminist issues that
were entangled in her life have been narrowly examined or reduced
by an author's chosen theoretical format; and the terms of her
lesbian identity have been overlooked. In this case study of une
femme inadaptee and an unfit feminist, Elizabeth Kahn re-situates
Laurencin in the on-going feminist debates that enrich the
disciplines of art history, women's studies and literary criticism.
Kahn's thorough reading of the artist's visual and literary
production ensures a comprehensive overview which addresses notable
works and passages but also integrates those that are less well
known. Incorporating feminist theory and building on the work of
contemporary feminist art historians, she avoids the heroics of
conventional biography, instead allowing her subject to participate
in the historical collective of women's work. Provocative and
engagingly written, this fresh new study of Marie Laurencin's life
and works also explores the multiple valences by which to connect
the histories of, and find new connections between, women artists
across the twentieth century.
In The Psychologizing of Modernity, Mark Jarzombek examines the impact of psychology on twentieth-century aesthetics. Analyzing the interface among psychology, art history and avant-gardist practices, he also reflects on the longevity of the myth of aesthetic individuality as it infiltrated not only avant-garde art, but also history writing. The principle focus of this study is pre-World War II Germany, where theories of empathy and Entartung emerged; and postwar America, where artists, critics and historians gradually shifted from their reliance on psychology to philosophy, and most recently, to theory.
 |
Affinities
(Paperback)
Brian Dillon
|
R410
R372
Discovery Miles 3 720
Save R38 (9%)
|
Ships in 9 - 15 working days
|
|
What do we mean when we claim affinity with an object or picture,
or say affinities exist between such
things? Affinities is a critical and personal study of
a sensation that is not exactly taste, desire, or allyship, but has
aspects of all. Approaching this subject via discrete examples,
this book is first of all about images that have stayed with the
author over many years, or grown in significance during months of
pandemic isolation, when the visual field had shrunk. Some are
historical works by artists such as Julia Margaret Cameron, Dora
Maar, Claude Cahun, Samuel Beckett and Andy Warhol. Others are
scientific or vernacular images: sea creatures, migraine auras,
astronomical illustrations derived from dreams. Also family
photographs, film stills, records of atomic ruin. And contemporary
art by Rinko Kawauchi, Susan Hiller and John Stezaker. Written as a
series of linked essays, interwoven with a reflection on affinity
itself, Affinities is an extraordinary book about the
intimate and abstract pleasures of reading and looking.
Linda Nochlin's seminal essay on women artists is widely
acknowledged as the first real attempt at a feminist history of
art. Nochlin refused to handle the question of why there had been
no 'great women artists' on its own, corrupted, terms. Instead, she
dismantled the very concept of 'greatness', unravelling the basic
assumptions that had centred a male-coded 'genius' in the study of
art. With unparalleled insight and startling wit, Nochlin laid bare
the acceptance of a white male viewpoint in art historical thought
as not merely a moral failure, but an intellectual one. Freedom, as
she sees it, requires women to risk entirely demolishing the art
world's institutions, and rebuilding them anew - in other words, to
leap into the unknown. In this stand-alone anniversary edition,
Nochlin's essay is published alongside its reappraisal, 'Thirty
Years After'. Written in an era of thriving feminist theory, as
well as queer theory, race and postcolonial studies, 'Thirty Years
After' is a striking reflection on the emergence of a whole new
canon. With reference to Joan Mitchell, Louise Bourgeois, Cindy
Sherman and many more, Nochlin diagnoses the state of women and art
with unmatched precision and verve. 'Why Have There Been No Great
Women Artists?' has become a slogan and rallying cry that resonates
across culture and society; Dior even adopted it in their 2018
collections. In the 2020s, at a time when 'certain patriarchal
values are making a comeback', Nochlin's message could not be more
urgent: as she herself put it in 2015, 'there is still a long way
to go'. With 14 illustrations
In 1877, Ruskin accused Whistler of 'flinging a pot of paint in the
public's face'. Was he right? After all, Whistler always denied
that the true function of art was to represent anything. If a
painting does not represent, what is it, other than mere paint,
flung in the public's face? Whistler's answer was simple: painting
is music - or it is poetry. Georges Braque, half a century later,
echoed Whistler's answer. So did Braque's friends Apollinaire and
Ponge. They presented their poetry as music too - and as painting.
But meanwhile, composers such as Satie and Stravinsky were
presenting their own art - music - as if it transposed the values
of painting or of poetry. The fundamental principle of this
intermedial aesthetic, which bound together an extraordinary
fraternity of artists in all media in Paris, from 1885 to 1945, was
this: we must always think about the value of a work of art, not
within the logic of its own medium, but as if it transposed the
value of art in another medium. Peter Dayan traces the history of
this principle: how it created our very notion of 'great art', why
it declined as a vision from the 1960s and how, in the 21st
century, it is fighting back.
|
|