|
|
Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy
For courses in Business Ethics A fresh approach to the assumptions
that underlie business practices Two recent events - the 2008
economic meltdown and the ongoing concentration of the nation's
wealth in the hands of a very small percentage of the population -
have led many people to question a number of basic assumptions
about business, corporations, and the workings of contemporary
free-market capitalism in a global economy. Written as a dialogue
between Socrates and a hypothetical contemporary CEO, Socrates
Comes to Wall Street leads students to think critically about
perspectives and practices that are taken as "givens" in most
American business schools and corporations. Employing this original
and provocative approach, author Thomas White seeks to encourage
the next generation of business leaders to be more astute about the
implications of their actions, and to act more prudently and more
fairly than we have seen in the recent past.
Traditional moral theory usually has either of two emphases:
virtuous moral character or principles for distributing duties and
goods. Zone Morality introduces a third focus: families and
businesses are systems created by the causal reciprocities of their
members. These relations embody the duties and permissions of a
system's moral code. Core systems satisfy basic interests and
needs; we move easily among them hardly noticing that moral demands
vary from system to system. Moral conflicts arise because of
discord within or among systems but also because morality has three
competing sites: self-assertive, self-regarding people; the moral
codes of systems; and regulative principles that enhance social
cohesion. Each wants authority to control the other two. Their
struggles make governance fragile. A strong church or authoritarian
government reduces conflict by imposing its rules, but democracy
resists that solution. Procedural democracy is a default position.
Its laws and equitable procedures defend people or systems having
diverse interests when society fails to create a public that would
govern for the common interest.
|
|