|
Books > Humanities > History > Asian / Middle Eastern history > From 1900 > Postwar, from 1945 > Vietnam War
In the Tet Offensive of 1968, Viet Cong and North Vietnamese
forces launched a massive countrywide attack on South Vietnam.
Though the Communists failed to achieve their tactical and
operational objectives, James Willbanks claims Hanoi won a
strategic victory. The offensive proved that America's progress was
grossly overstated and caused many Americans and key presidential
advisors to question the wisdom of prolonging combat.
Willbanks also maintains that the Communists laid siege to a
Marine combat base two weeks prior to the Tet Offensive-known as
the Battle of Khe Sanh--to distract the United States. It is his
belief that these two events are intimately linked, and in his
concise and compelling history, he presents an engaging portrait of
the conflicts and singles out key problems of interpretation.
Willbanks divides his study into six sections, beginning with a
historical overview of the events leading up to the offensive, the
attack itself, and the consequent battles of Saigon, Hue, and Khe
Sahn. He continues with a critical assessment of the main themes
and issues surrounding the offensive, and concludes with excerpts
from American and Vietnamese documents, maps and chronologies, an
annotated list of resources, and a short encyclopedia of key
people, places, and events.
An experienced military historian and scholar of the Vietnam
War, Willbanks has written a unique critical reference and guide
that enlarges the debate surrounding this important turning point
in America's longest war.
As the Vietnam War was beginning to turn towards its bitter end, Le
Quan fought under beloved general Tran Ba Di in the army of South
Vietnam. An unlikely encounter thrust the two men together, and
they developed a mutual respect in their home country during
wartime. Forty years later, the two men reconnected in a wholly
unlikely setting: a family road trip to Key West. Soldier On is
written by Le Quan's daughter, who artfully crafts the road trip as
a frame through which the stories of both men come to life. Le Quan
and Tran Ba Di provide two different views of life in the South
Vietnamese army, and they embody two different realities of the
aftermath of defeat. Le Quan was able to smuggle his family out of
Saigon among the so-called boat people, eventually receiving asylum
in America and resettling in Texas. General Tran Ba Di, on the
other hand, experienced political consequences: he spent seventeen
years in a re-education camp before he was released to family in
Florida. A proud daughter's perspective brings this
intergenerational and intercontinental story to life, as Tran
herself plumbs her remembrances to expand the legacy of the many
Vietnamese who weathered conflict to forge new futures in America.
From the defeat of the Army of the Republic of Vietnam at Ap Bac to
the battles of the Ia Drang Valley, Khe Sanh, and more, Storms over
the Mekong offers a reassessment of key turning points in the
Vietnam War. Award-winning historian William P. Head not only
reexamines these pivotal battles but also provides a new
interpretation on the course of the war in Southeast Asia. In
considering Operation Rolling Thunder, for example-which Head dubs
as "too much rolling and not enough thunder"-readers will grasp the
full scope of the campaign, from specifically targeted bridges in
North Vietnam to the challenges of measuring success or failure,
the domestic political situation, and how over time, Head argues,
"slowly, but surely, Rolling Thunder dug itself into a hole."
Likewise, Head shows how the battles for Saigon and Hue during the
Tet Offensive of 1968 were tactical defeats for the Communist
forces with as many as 40,000 killed and no real gains. At the same
time, however, Tet made it clear to many in Washington that victory
in Vietnam would require a still greater commitment of men and
resources, far more than the American people were willing to
invest. Storms over the Mekong is a blow-by-blow account of the key
military events, to be sure. But beyond that, it is also a measured
reconsideration of the battles and moments that Americans thought
they already knew, adding up to a new history of the Vietnam War.
International lawyers and distinguished scholars consider the
question: Is it legally justifiable to treat the Vietnam War as a
civil war or as a peculiar modern species of international law?
Originally published in 1968. The Princeton Legacy Library uses the
latest print-on-demand technology to again make available
previously out-of-print books from the distinguished backlist of
Princeton University Press. These editions preserve the original
texts of these important books while presenting them in durable
paperback and hardcover editions. The goal of the Princeton Legacy
Library is to vastly increase access to the rich scholarly heritage
found in the thousands of books published by Princeton University
Press since its founding in 1905.
The Vietnam War is an outstanding collection of primary documents
related to America s conflict in Vietnam which includes a balance
of original American and Vietnamese perspectives, providing a
uniquely varied range of insights into both American and Vietnamese
experiences. * Includes substantial non-American content, including
many original English translations of Vietnamese-authored texts
which showcase the diversity and complexity of Vietnamese
experiences during the war * Contains original American documents
germane to the continuing debates about the causes, consequences
and morality of the US intervention * Incorporates personal
histories of individual Americans and Vietnamese * Introductory
headnotes place each document in context * Features a range of
non-textual documents, including iconic photographs and political
cartoons
Charged with monitoring the huge civilian press corps that
descended on Hue during the Vietnam War's Tet offensive, US Army
Captain George W. Smith witnessed firsthand a vicious twenty-five
day battle. Smith recounts in harrowing detail the separate, poorly
coordinated wars that were fought in the retaking of the Hue.
Notably, he documents the little-known contributions of the South
Vietnamese forces, who prevented the Citadel portion of the city
from being overrun, and who then assisted the US Marine Corps in
evicting the North Vietnamese Army. He also tells of the social and
political upheaval in the city, reporting the execution of nearly
3,000 civilians by the NVA and the Vietcong. The tenacity of the
NVA forces in Hue earned the respect of the troops on the field and
triggered a sequence of attitudinal changes in the United States.
It was those changes, Smith suggests, that eventually led to the US
abandonment of the war.
A poignantly written and heartfelt memoir that recounts the
author's hair raising-and occasionally hilarious-experience as a
young Marine artilleryman in Vietnam. Gritty, unvarnished and often
disturbing at times, the book provides a unique window into the
lasting physical and emotional wounds of war. Realistic and highly
readable, the story is not the typical gung-ho narrative of a
combat Marine eager to die for God and country. A somewhat
different and interesting perspective and a must read for veterans,
Marine Corps buffs, students of the 1960's culture as well as those
seeking a better understanding of the influence and relevancy of
America's long and indecisive misadventure in Vietnam.
The Vietnam War tends to conjure up images of American soldiers
battling an elusive enemy in thick jungle, the thudding of
helicopters overhead. But there were in fact several Vietnam wars -
an anticolonial war with France, a cold war turned hot with the
United States, a civil war between North and South Vietnam and
among the southern Vietnamese, a revolutionary war of ideas over
what should guide Vietnamese society into its postcolonial future,
and finally a war of memories after the official end of hostilities
with the fall of Saigon in 1975. This book looks at how the
Vietnamese themselves experienced all of these conflicts, showing
how the wars for Vietnam were rooted in fundamentally conflicting
visions of what an independent Vietnam should mean that in many
ways remain unresolved to this day. Drawing upon twenty years of
research, Mark Philip Bradley examines the thinking and the
behaviour of the key wartime decisionmakers in Hanoi and Saigon,
while at the same time exploring how ordinary Vietnamese people,
northerners and southerners, soldiers and civilians, urban elites
and rural peasants, radicals and conservatives, came to understand
the thirty years of bloody warfare that unfolded around them-and
how they made sense of its aftermath.
Hanoi's Road to the Vietnam War opens in 1954 with the signing of
the Geneva accords that ended the eight-year-long
Franco-Indochinese War and created two Vietnams. In agreeing to the
accords, Ho Chi Minh and other leaders of the Democratic Republic
of Vietnam anticipated a new period of peace leading to national
reunification under their rule; they never imagined that within a
decade they would be engaged in an even bigger feud with the United
States. Basing his work on new and largely inaccessible Vietnamese
materials as well as French, British, Canadian, and American
documents, Pierre Asselin explores the communist path to war.
Specifically, he examines the internal debates and other elements
that shaped Hanoi's revolutionary strategy in the decade preceding
US military intervention, and resulting domestic and foreign
programs. Without exonerating Washington for its role in the advent
of hostilities in 1965, Hanoi's Road to the Vietnam War
demonstrates that those who directed the effort against the United
States and its allies in Saigon were at least equally responsible
for creating the circumstances that culminated in arguably the most
tragic conflict of the Cold War era.
In 1968, at the age of 22, Karl Marlantes abandoned his Oxford
University scholarship to sign up for active service with the US
Marine Corps in Vietnam. Pitched into a war that had no defined
military objective other than kill ratios and body counts, what he
experienced over the next thirteen months in the jungles of South
East Asia shook him to the core. But what happened when he came
home covered with medals was almost worse. It took Karl four
decades to come to terms with what had really happened, during the
course of which he painstakingly constructed a fictionalized
version of his war, MATTERHORN, which has subsequently been hailed
as the definitive Vietnam novel.
WHAT IT IS LIKE TO GO TO WAR takes us back to Vietnam, but this
time there is no fictional veil. Here are the hard-won truths that
underpin MATTERHORN: the author's real-life experiences behind the
book's indelible scenes. But it is much more than this. It is part
exorcism of Karl's own experiences of combat, part confession, part
philosophical primer for the young man about to enter combat. It It
is also a devastatingly frank answer to the questions '"What is it
like to be a soldier?"' "What is it like to face death?"' and
"'What is it like to kill someone?"'
Finalist, National Book Critics Circle Award Finalist, National
Book Award in Nonfiction A New York Times Book Review "The Year in
Reading" Selection All wars are fought twice, the first time on the
battlefield, the second time in memory. From the author of the
Pulitzer Prize-winning novel The Sympathizer comes a searching
exploration of the conflict Americans call the Vietnam War and
Vietnamese call the American War-a conflict that lives on in the
collective memory of both nations. "[A] gorgeous, multifaceted
examination of the war Americans call the Vietnam War-and which
Vietnamese call the American War...As a writer, [Nguyen] brings
every conceivable gift-wisdom, wit, compassion, curiosity-to the
impossible yet crucial work of arriving at what he calls 'a just
memory' of this war." -Kate Tuttle, Los Angeles Times "In Nothing
Ever Dies, his unusually thoughtful consideration of war,
self-deception and forgiveness, Viet Thanh Nguyen penetrates deeply
into memories of the Vietnamese war...[An] important book, which
hits hard at self-serving myths." -Jonathan Mirsky, Literary Review
"Ultimately, Nguyen's lucid, arresting, and richly sourced inquiry,
in the mode of Susan Sontag and W. G. Sebald, is a call for true
and just stories of war and its perpetual legacy." -Donna Seaman,
Booklist (starred review)
Cold War Friendships explores the plight of the Asian ally of the
American wars in Korea and Vietnam. Enlisted into proxy warfare,
this figure is not a friend but a "friendly," a wartime convenience
enlisted to serve a superpower. It is through this deeply unequal
relation, however, that the Cold War friendly secures her own
integrity and insists upon her place in the neocolonial imperium.
This study reads a set of highly enterprising wartime subjects who
make their way to the US via difficult attachments. American forces
ventured into newly postcolonial Korea and Vietnam, both plunged
into civil wars, to draw the dividing line of the Cold War. The
strange success of containment and militarization in Korea
unraveled in Vietnam, but the friendly marks the significant
continuity between these hot wars. In both cases, the friendly
justified the fight: she was also a political necessity who
redeployed cold war alliances, and, remarkably, made her way to
America. As subjects in process-and indeed, proto-Americans-these
figures are prime literary subjects, whose processes of becoming
are on full display in Asian American novels and testimonies of
these wars. Literary writings on both of these conflicts are
presently burgeoning, and Cold War Friendships performs close
analyses of key texts whose stylistic constraints and
contradictions-shot through with political and historical
nuance-present complex gestures of alliance.
|
|