|
Books > Social sciences > Warfare & defence
 |
Run To The Fire
(Hardcover)
Chad Collins; Foreword by Roger Staubach
|
R721
R672
Discovery Miles 6 720
Save R49 (7%)
|
Ships in 10 - 15 working days
|
|
In 1944 the British War Office distributed a handbook to British
soldiers informing them what to expect and how to behave in a
newly-liberated France. Containing candid descriptions of this
war-ravaged society (widespread malnourishment, rampant
tuberculosis) as well as useful phrases and a pronunciation guide
(Bonjewer, commont-allay-voo), it was an indispensable guide to
everyday life. This small, unassuming publication had a deeper
purpose: to bring together two allies who did not enjoy ideal
relations in 1944. The book attempts to reconcile differences by
stressing a shared history and the common aim - defeating Hitler.
It also tried to dispel misapprehensions: 'There is a fairly
widespread belief among people in Britain that the French are a
particularly gay, frivolous people with no morals and few
convictions.' Often unintentionally hilarious in its expression of
these false impressions, the book is also a guide for avoiding
social embarrassment: 'If you should happen to imagine that the
first pretty French girl who smiles at you intends to dance the
can-can or take you to bed, you will risk stirring up a lot of
trouble for yourself - and for our relations with the French.' Many
of its observations still ring true today. For example, 'The French
are more polite than most of us. Remember to call them "Monsieur,
Madame, Mademoiselle," not just "Oy!"' Others remind us of how we
recently we have adopted French customs: 'Don't drink yourself
silly. If you get the chance to drink wine, learn to "'take it".'
Anyone with an interest in Britain, France or World War II will
find this an irresistible insight into British attitudes towards
the French and an interesting, timeless commentary on Anglo-French
relations.
'Of all branches of human endeavour, diplomacy is the most
protean.' That is how Harold Nicolson begins this book. It is an
apt opening. The Paris Conference of 1919, attended by thirty-two
nations, had the supremely challenging task of attempting to bring
about a lasting peace after the global catastrophe of the Great
War.
Harold Nicolson was a member of the British delegation. His book
is in two parts. In the first he provides an account of the
conference, in the second his diary covering his six month stint.
There is a piquant counterpoise between the two. Of his diary he
writes, 'I should wish it to be read as people read the
reminiscences of a subaltern in the trenches. There is the same
distrust of headquarters; the same irritation against the
staff-officer who interrupts; the same belief that one's own sector
is the centre of the battle-front; the same conviction that one is,
with great nobility of soul, winning the war quite single-handed.'
The diary ends with prophetic disillusionment, 'To bed, sick of
life.'
As a first-hand account of one of the most important events
shaping the modern world this book remains a classic.
The Tree of Gernika: a Field Study of Modern War was published
in 1938. It is G. L. Steer's masterpiece. Martha Gellhorn famously
wrote to Eleanor Roosevelt:
""
""'You must read a book by a man names Steer: it is called The
Tree of Gernika. It is about the fight of the Basques - he's the
London Times man - and no better book has come out of the war and
he says well all the things I have tried to say to you the times I
saw you, after Spain. It is beautifully written and true, and few
books are like that, and fewer still deal with war. Pleas get
it.'
""
""As Paul Preston says in his "We Saw Spain Die," 'Martha
Gellhorn's judgement has more than stood the test of time.'
""
""In his introduction, Nick Rankin writes.' "The Tree of
Gernika" tells how Euzkadi, the democratic republic that the
Basques created in their green homeland by the Bay of Biscay,
fought for freedom and decency in an atrocious civil war. After a
year of struggle, blockaded by sea, bombed from the air, fighting
against overwhelming odds in their own hill, the Basques in the end
lost to Franco's forces - but they lost honourably, without
resorting to murder, torture and treachery.'
""
""It was Steer who alerted the world to the destruction of
Gernika (Basque spelling), Guernica (Spanish spelling). It was the
most important dispatch of his life, run by both "The Times "and
"The New York Times."
Nick Rankin rightly describes "The Tree of Gernika" as 'a
masterpiece of narrative history and eyewitness reporting by
someone close to the key events . . .'
The Battle of Britain was the decisive air campaign fought over
Southern England in the summer and autumn of 1940. From 10th July
until 31st October 1940 Fighter Command aircrews from over 16
nations fought and died repelling the Luftwaffe. Discover tales of
courage, bravery and a host of fascinating, and little-known facts
about the combatants, leaders and strategies of both sides. Find
out about propaganda employed by both sides to try and influence
the battle, the Dowding system relaying information to the pilots
in their fighter's and the classic 1969 film starring Sir Laurence
Oliver. This absorbing book is published to coincide with the
commemorations surrounding the 80th Anniversary of the Battle of
Britain 2020. "The Amazing and Extraordinary Facts series" presents
interesting, surprising and little-known facts and stories about a
wide range of topics which are guaranteed to inform, absorb and
entertain in equal measure.
Popular entertainment in antebellum Cincinnati ran the gamut from
high culture to shows barely above the level of the tawdry. Among
the options for those seeking entertainment in the summer of 1856
was the display of a "Wild Woman," purportedly a young woman
captured while living a feral life beyond the frontier. The popular
exhibit, which featured a silent, underdressed woman chained to a
bed, was almost assuredly a hoax. Local activist women, however,
used their influence to prompt a judge to investigate the display.
The court employed eleven doctors, who forcibly subdued and
examined the woman before advising that she be admitted to an
insane asylum. In his riveting analysis of this remarkable episode
in antebellum American history, Michael D. Pierson describes how
people in different political parties and sections of the country
reacted to the exhibit. Specifically, he uses the lens of the Wild
Woman display to explore the growing cultural divisions between the
North and the South in 1856, especially the differing gender
ideologies of the northern Republican Party and the more southern
focused Democrats. In addition, Pierson shows how the treatment of
the Wild Woman of Cincinnati prompted an increasing demand for
women's political and social empowerment at a time when the country
allowed for the display of a captive female without evidence that
she had granted consent.
In 1914, the Associated Newspapers sent correspondent Herbert Corey
to Europe on the day Great Britain declared war on Germany. During
the Great War that followed, Corey reported from France, Britain,
and Germany, visiting the German lines on both the western and
eastern fronts. He also reported from Greece, Italy, Switzerland,
Holland, Belgium, and Serbia. When the Armistice was signed in
November 1918, Corey defied the rules of the American Expeditionary
Forces and crossed into Germany. He covered the Paris Peace
Conference the following year. No other foreign correspondent
matched the longevity of his reporting during World War I. Until
recently, however, his unpublished memoir lay largely unnoticed
among his papers in the Library of Congress. With publication of
Herbert Corey's Great War, coeditors Peter Finn and John Maxwell
Hamilton reestablish Corey's name in the annals of American war
reporting. As a correspondent, he defies easy comparison. He
approximates Ernie Pyle in his sympathetic interest in the American
foot soldier, but he also told stories about troops on the other
side and about noncombatants. He is especially illuminating on the
obstacles reporters faced in conveying the story of the Great War
to Americans. As his memoir makes clear, Corey didn't believe he
was in Europe to serve the Allies. He viewed himself as an
outsider, one who was deeply ambivalent about the entry of the
United States into the war. His idiosyncratic, opinionated, and
very American voice makes for compelling reading.
|
|