Merit-based tests and contests have become popular methods for
allocating rewards from trophies to contracts, jobs to grants,
admissions to licenses. With origins in jurisprudence, methods of
rewarding merit seem fairer than those rewarding political or
social connections, bribery, aggression, status, or wealth. Because
of this, merit-based competitions are well-suited to the societal
belief that people should be rewarded for what they know or do, and
not for who they know or are; however, judging merit is rarely an
easy task it is prone to a variety of biases and errors. Small
biases and errors, especially in large competitions, can make large
differences in who or what is rewarded. It is important, then, to
learn how to spot flaws in procedures for judging merit and to
correct them when possible.
Based on over 20 years of theory and research in human judgment,
decision making and social psychology, this unique book brings
together for the first time what is known about the processes and
problems of judging merit and their consequences. It also provides
practical suggestions for increasing the fairness of merit-based
competitions, and examines the future and limits of these
competitions in society.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!