|
|
Books > History > American history > 1800 to 1900
James M. McPherson is acclaimed as one of the finest historians
writing today and a preeminent commentator on the Civil War. Battle
Cry of Freedom, his Pulitzer Prize-winning account of that
conflict, was a national bestseller that Hugh Brogan, in The New
York Times, called "history writing of the highest order." Now, in
Drawn With the Sword, McPherson offers a series of thoughtful and
engaging essays on some of the most enduring questions of the Civil
War, written in the masterful prose that has become his trademark.
Filled with fresh interpretations, puncturing old myths and
challenging new ones, Drawn With the Sword explores such questions
as why the North won and why the South lost (emphasizing the role
of contingency in the Northern victory), whether Southern or
Northern aggression began the war, and who really freed the slaves,
Abraham Lincoln or the slaves themselves. McPherson offers
memorable portraits of the great leaders who people the landscape
of the Civil War: Ulysses S. Grant, struggling to write his memoirs
with the same courage and determination that marked his successes
on the battlefield; Robert E. Lee, a brilliant general and a true
gentleman, yet still a product of his time and place; and Abraham
Lincoln, the leader and orator whose mythical figure still looms
large over our cultural landscape. And McPherson discusses
often-ignored issues such as the development of the Civil War into
a modern "total war" against both soldiers and civilians, and the
international impact of the American Civil War in advancing the
cause of republicanism and democracy in countries from Brazil and
Cuba to France and England. Of special interest is the final essay,
entitled "What's the Matter With History?," a trenchant critique of
the field of history today, which McPherson describes here as "more
and more about less and less." He writes that professional
historians have abandoned narrative history written for the greater
audience of educated general readers in favor of impenetrable tomes
on minor historical details which serve only to edify other
academics, thus leaving the historical education of the general
public to films and television programs such as Glory and Ken
Burns's PBS documentary The Civil War.
Each essay in Drawn With the Sword reveals McPherson's own profound
knowledge of the Civil War and of the controversies among
historians, presenting all sides in clear and lucid prose and
concluding with his own measured and eloquent opinions. Readers
will rejoice that McPherson has once again proven by example that
history can be both accurate and interesting, informative and
well-written. Mark Twain wrote that the Civil War "wrought so
profoundly upon the entire national character that the influence
cannot be measured short of two or three generations." In Drawn
With the Sword, McPherson gracefully and brilliantly illuminates
this momentous conflict.
In his Second Inaugural Address, delivered as the nation was in the
throes of the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln proclaimed that both sides
"read the same Bible and pray to the same God, and each invokes His
aid against the other." He wasn't speaking metaphorically: the
Bible was frequently wielded as a weapon in support of both North
and South. As James P. Byrd reveals in this insightful narrative,
no book was more important to the Civil War than the Bible. From
Massachusetts to Mississippi and beyond, the Bible was the nation's
most read and respected book. It presented a drama of salvation and
damnation, of providence and judgment, of sacred history and
sacrifice. When Americans argued over the issues that divided them
- slavery, secession, patriotism, authority, white supremacy, and
violence - the Bible was the book they most often invoked. Soldiers
fought the Civil War with Bibles in hand, and both sides called the
war just and sacred. In scripture, both Union and Confederate
soldiers found inspiration for dying-and for killing-on a scale
never before seen in the nation's history. With approximately
750,000 fatalities, the Civil War was the deadliest of the nation's
wars, leading many to turn to the Bible not just to fight but to
deal with its inevitable trauma. A fascinating overview of
religious and military conflict, A Holy Baptism of Fire and Blood
draws on an astonishing array of sources to demonstrate the many
ways that Americans enlisted the Bible in the nation's bloodiest,
and arguably most biblically-saturated conflict.
In "Teaching Equality," Adam Fairclough provides an overview of the
enormous contributions made by African American teachers to the
black freedom movement in the United States. Beginning with the
close of the Civil War, when "the efforts of the slave regime to
prevent black literacy meant that blacks . . . associated education
with liberation," Fairclough explores the development of
educational ideals in the black community up through the years of
the civil rights movement. He traces black educators' connection to
the white community and examines the difficult compromises they had
to make in order to secure schools and funding. Teachers did not,
he argues, sell out the black community but instead instilled hope
and commitment to equality in the minds of their pupils. Defining
the term teacher broadly to include any person who taught students,
whether in a backwoods cabin or the brick halls of a university,
Fairclough illustrates the multifaceted responsibilities of
individuals who were community leaders and frontline activists as
well as conveyors of knowledge. He reveals the complicated lives of
these educators who, in the face of a prejudice-based social order
and a history of oppression, sustained and inspired the minds and
hearts of generations of black Americans.
In time for the 150th anniversary of the Civil War Battle of
Antietam (September 17, 1862), author Laurence H. Freiheit has
written the definitive study of cavalry actions, Union and
Confederate, before, during, and after the battle. This massive
study, the product of years of research and topographical analysis,
will surely be the authoritative scholarly resource on this aspect
of the Civil War for years to come. Boots and Saddles: Cavalry
During the Maryland Campaign of September 1862 is a 594-page, 8 1/2
x 11" hardcover, with over 200 maps, photographs, and
illustrations. Included is a driving tour written by Craig Swain,
with modern maps and GPS coordinates. The second edition corrects
some typographical errors and supplies updates based on new source
In early 1864, as the Confederate Army of Tennessee licked its
wounds after being routed at the Battle of Chattanooga,
Major-General Patrick Cleburne (the "Stonewall of the West")
proposed that "the most courageous of our slaves" be trained as
soldiers and that "every slave in the South who shall remain true
to the Confederacy in this war" be freed. In Confederate
Emancipation, Bruce Levine looks closely at such Confederate plans
to arm and free slaves. He shows that within a year of Cleburne's
proposal, which was initially rejected out of hand, Jefferson
Davis, Judah P. Benjamin, and Robert E. Lee had all reached the
same conclusions. At that point, the idea was debated widely in
newspapers and drawing rooms across the South, as more and more
slaves fled to Union lines and fought in the ranks of the Union
army. Eventually, the soldiers of Lee's army voted on the proposal,
and the Confederate government actually enacted a version of it in
March. The Army issued the necessary orders just two weeks before
Appomattox, too late to affect the course of the war. Throughout
the book, Levine captures the voices of blacks and whites, wealthy
planters and poor farmers, soldiers and officers, and newspaper
editors and politicians from all across the South. In the process,
he sheds light on such hot-button topics as what the Confederacy
was fighting for, whether black southerners were willing to fight
in large numbers in defense of the South, and what this episode
foretold about life and politics in the post-war South. Confederate
Emancipation offers an engaging and illuminating account of a
fascinating and politically charged idea, setting it firmly and
vividly in the context of the Civil War and the part played in it
by the issue of slavery and the actions of the slaves themselves.
John Adams, one of the Founding Fathers of our nation and its
second president, spent nearly the last third of his life in
retirement grappling with contradictory views of his place in
history and fearing his reputation would not fare well in the
generations after his death. In an incomplete autobiography, and in
numerous publications and voluminous correspondence with Thomas
Jefferson and many others, he argued and railed against those who
disagreed with him or made little of his contribution to our
country's political foundations. And indeed, future generations did
slight him, elevating Jefferson and Madison to lofty heights with
Washington while Adams remained way back in the second tier. Now,
in a witty, clear, and thoughtful narrative of Adams's later life
at his home in Quincy, Joseph Ellis explores the mind and
personality of the man as well as the earlier events that shaped
his thinking. Readers will discover Adams to be both contentious
and lovable, generous and petty, and the most intellectually
profound of the revolutionary generation, a man who may have
contributed to the earlier underestimates of his role in history,
and whose perspective on America's prospects has relevance for us
today.
The 29th Mississippi Infantry Regiment 29th Infantry Regiment was
organized at Corinth, Mississippi, in April, 1862 with men from
Grenada, Lafayette, Panola, Yalobusha, Washington, and De Soto
counties. The unit served in Mississippi, then moved to Kentucky
where it saw action in Munfordville. Later it joined the Army of
Tennessee and was placed in General Walthall's and Brantly's
Brigade where it participated in many battles from Murfreesboro to
Bentonville. The 29th lost 5 killed and 36 wounded at Munfordville,
had 34 killed and 202 wounded at Murfreesboro, and suffered
fifty-three percent disabled of the 364 engaged at Chickamauga. It
reported 191 casualties at Chattanooga and in December, 1863 was
consolidated with the 30th and 34th Regiment and totalled 554 men
and 339 arms. This unit reported 5 killed and 22 wounded at Resaca,
and in the fight at Ezra Church the 29th/30th lost 8 killed and 20
wounded. Very few surrendered in North Carolina in April, 1865.
An artillery man's experience of the war between the states
Carlton McCarthy, the author of this book, was a serving soldier in
the Army of the Confederacy during the great American Civil War. As
a humble private soldier of the second company of the Richmond
Howitzers, Cutshaw's Battalion of Artillery, he had an intimate
experience of life on campaign and upon the battlefield from within
the Second Corps of the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia.
McCarthy has painted a fascinating portrait of his experience of
war and army life taking the reader to the very heart of the
everyday business of soldiering for the Southern states. Much
detail will be found in these pages concerning the minutiae of camp
and campaign in all its aspects. McCarthy gives a vivid account of
the closing stages of the war, the collapse of the Confederacy and
his return homeward immediately after the surrender and the
difficulties of subsisting in its aftermath.
There have been thousands of books put out about the Civil War, but
none by a Civil War Buff, so I wrote one. This book was a produce
of five years' work and puts the war in a way that casual fans of
the war will be surprised at what took place.This book is in three
parts: Civil War Timeline: the events, battles, politics, and
personal observations of those who were a part of the war.Things
that any good soldier of the Civil War should know: the weapons,
uniforms, food, duties, marching, fighting, medical advice, and
slang (with a little tribute to the Navy and Marines).Amazing
Facts: starting with the issues, this part displays many facts that
usually do not make it into the history books.
"Ty Seidule scorches us with the truth and rivets us with his
fierce sense of moral urgency." --Ron Chernow In a forceful but
humane narrative, former soldier and head of the West Point history
department Ty Seidule's Robert E. Lee and Me challenges the myths
and lies of the Confederate legacy--and explores why some of this
country's oldest wounds have never healed. Ty Seidule grew up
revering Robert E. Lee. From his southern childhood to his service
in the U.S. Army, every part of his life reinforced the Lost Cause
myth: that Lee was the greatest man who ever lived, and that the
Confederates were underdogs who lost the Civil War with honor. Now,
as a retired brigadier general and Professor Emeritus of History at
West Point, his view has radically changed. From a soldier, a
scholar, and a southerner, Ty Seidule believes that American
history demands a reckoning. In a unique blend of history and
reflection, Seidule deconstructs the truth about the
Confederacy--that its undisputed primary goal was the subjugation
and enslavement of Black Americans--and directly challenges the
idea of honoring those who labored to preserve that system and
committed treason in their failed attempt to achieve it. Through
the arc of Seidule's own life, as well as the culture that formed
him, he seeks a path to understanding why the facts of the Civil
War have remained buried beneath layers of myth and even outright
lies--and how they embody a cultural gulf that separates millions
of Americans to this day. Part history lecture, part meditation on
the Civil War and its fallout, and part memoir, Robert E. Lee and
Me challenges the deeply-held legends and myths of the
Confederacy--and provides a surprising interpretation of essential
truths that our country still has a difficult time articulating and
accepting.
With Union armies poised to launch the final campaigns against the
Confederacy in 1864, three of its five commanders were "political
generals"--appointed officers with little or no military training.
Army chief of staff Henry Halleck thought such generals jeopardized
the lives of men under their command and he and his peers held them
in utter contempt. Historians have largely followed suit. Thomas
Goss, however, offers a new and more positive assessment of the
leadership qualities of these Northern commanders. In the process,
he cuts through the stereotypes of political generals as
superfluous and largely inept tacticians, ambitious schemers, and
military failures. Goss examines the reasons why the selection
process yielded so many generals who lacked military backgrounds an
explores the tense and often bitter relationships among political
and professional officers to illuminate the dynamics of Union
generalship during the war. As this book reveals, professional
generals viewed the war as a military problem requiring
battle-field solutions, while appointees (and President Lincoln)
focused more emphatically on the broader political contours of the
struggle. The resulting friction often eroded Northern morale and
damaged the North's war effort. Goss challenges the traditional
idea that success was measured only on the battle-field by
demonstrating significant links between military success and the
achievement of the Union's political objectives. Examining
commanders like Benjamin Butler, Nathaniel Banks, John McClernand,
John Fremont, and Franz Sigel, Goss shows how many filled vital
functions by raising troops, boosting homefront morale, securing
national support for the war--andsometimes even achieving
significant success on the battlefield. Comparing these generals
with their professional counterparts reveals that all had vital
roles to play in helping Lincoln prosecute the war and that West
Pointers, despite their military training, were not necessarily
better prepared for waging war. Whether professional or appointed,
Goss reminds us, all generals could be considered political
inasmuch as war is a continuation of politics by other means. He
shows us that far more was asked of Union commanders than to simply
win battles and in so doing urges a new appreciation of those
appointed leaders who were thrust into the maelstrom of the Civil
War.
This highly original work explores a previously unknown
financial conspiracy at the start of the American Civil War. The
book explains the reasons for the puzzling intensity of Missouri's
guerrilla conflict, and for the state's anomalous experience in
Reconstruction. In the broader history of the war, the book reveals
for the first time the nature of military mobilization in the
antebellum United States.
Full of true stories more dramatic than any fiction, The
Underground Railroad: A Reference Guide offers a fresh, revealing
look at the efforts of hundreds of dedicated persons-white and
black, men and women, from all walks of life-to help slave
fugitives find freedom in the decades leading up to the Civil War.
The Underground Railroad provides the richest portrayal yet of the
first large scale act of interracial collaboration in the United
States, mapping out the complex network of routes and safe stations
that made escape from slavery in the American South possible. Kerry
Walters' stirring account ranges from the earliest acts of slave
resistance and the rise of the Abolitionist movement, to the
establishment of clandestine "liberty lines" through the eastern
and then-western regions of the Union and ultimately to Canada.
Separating fact from legend, Walters draws extensively on
first-person accounts of those who made the Railroad work, those
who tried to stop it, and those who made the treacherous journey to
freedom-including Eliza Harris and Josiah Henson, the real-life
"Eliza" and "Uncle Tom" from Harriet Beecher Stowe's Uncle Tom's
Cabin. Original documents, from key legislation like The Fugitive
Slave Act of 1850 to first-person narratives of escaping slaves
Biographical sketches of key figures involved in the Underground
Railroad, including Levi Coffin, William Lloyd Garrison, Robert
Purvis, and Mary Ann Shadd
|
|