|
Books > History > American history > 1800 to 1900
This reminiscence of daily life on a Southern plantation during the
Civil War was originally published in 1888. The book is filled with
vivid details of everything from methods of making dyes and
preparing foods to race relations and the effects of the war. A
Blockaded Family is an unusual and beautifully-written primary
source of Southern life inside the blockade, told from a point of
view that is decidedly different from most post-war accounts.
Contents Include: Beginnings of the Secession Movement A Negro
Wedding Devices Rendered Necessary by the Blockade How the South
Met a Great Emergency War Time Scenes on an Alabama Plantation
Southern Women Their Ingenuity and Courage How Cloth was Dyed How
Shoes, Thread, Hats and Bonnets Were Manufactured Homespun Dresses
Home-Made Buttons and Pasteboard Uncle Ben Aunt Phillis and her
Domestic Trials Knitting around the Fireside Tramp, Tramp of the
Spinners Weaving Heavy Cloth Expensive Prints "Blood Will Tell"
Substitutes for Coffee Raspberry-Leaf Tea Home-Made Starch Putty,
and Cement Spinning Bees Old-Time Hoopskirts How the Slaves Lived
Their Barbecues Painful Realities of Civil Strife Straitened
Condition of the South Treatment of Prisoners Homespun Weddings A
Pathetic Incident Approach of the Northern Army Pillage and Plunder
"Papa's Fine Stock" The South Overrun by Soldiers Return of the
Vanquished Poverty of the Confederates Repairing Damages A Mother
made Happy
|
Fort McAllister
(Hardcover)
Roger S Durhan, Roger S. Durham
|
R781
R653
Discovery Miles 6 530
Save R128 (16%)
|
Ships in 10 - 15 working days
|
|
On a November afternoon in 1864, the weary Gen. John Bell Hood
surveyed the army waiting to attack the Federals at Franklin,
Tennessee. He gave the signal almost at dusk, and the Confederates
rushed forward to utter devastation. This book describes the events
and causes of the five-hour battle in gripping detail, particularly
focusing on the reasons for such slaughter at a time when the
outcome of the war had already been decided.
The genesis of the senseless tragedy, according to McDonough and
Connelly, lay in the appointment of Hood to command the Army of
Tennessee. It was his decision to throw a total force of some
20,000 men into an ill-advised frontal assault against the Union
troops. The Confederates made their approach, without substantial
artillery support, on a level of some two miles. Why did Hood
select such a catastrophic strategy? The authors analyze his
reasoning in full. Their vivid and moving narrative, with
statements from eyewitnesses to the battle, make compelling reading
for all Civil War buffs and historians.
James Lee McDonough is Justin Potter Professor of History at
David-Lipscomb College and is the author of Shiloh and Stones
River.
Thomas L. Connelly, professor of history at the university of South
Carolina, is the author of Army of the Heartland, The Marble Man,
and Autumn of Glory, a two-volume history of the Army of
Tennessee.
Seven perspectives of a bloody Civil War encounter
The Battle of Stone's River (or Murfreesboro to give it its
Confederate appellation) took place over the turn of the year
between 1862 and 1863 in Tennessee within the Western theatre of
the American Civil War. The outcome of the conflict was
inconclusive though the Union forces under Rosecrans regained a
measure of prestige after the debacle of Fredericksburg and
strategic advantage as Confederate strategic objectives in
Tennessee were confounded. The campaign was principally
distinguished by the appallingly high casualty toll on both sides
which bears the dubious distinction of being the highest in the
war. Both Bragg and Rosecrans lost almost one third of their
engaged forces. This unique book has brought together no less than
seven individual accounts-both personal experiences and works of
history-concerning this fascinating campaign and battle. Each one
might possibly be too small to achieve individual publication in
modern times, but together they make an essential volume for every
student of the period and theatre.
This work is the first monograph which closely examines the role of
the German minority in the American South during the Civil War. In
a comparative analysis of German civic leaders, businessmen,
militia officers and blockade runners in Charleston, New Orleans
and Richmond, it reveals a German immigrant population which not
only largely supported slavery, but was also heavily involved in
fighting the war. A detailed appendix includes an extensive survey
of primary and secondary sources, including tables listing the
members of the all-German units in Virginia, South Carolina and
Louisiana, with names, place of origin, rank, occupation, income,
and number of slaves owned. This book is a highly useful reference
work for historians, military scholars and genealogists conducting
research on Germans in the American Civil War and the American
South.
The ambitious self-made man who reached the pinnacle of American
politics--only to be felled by an assassin's bullet and to die at
the hands of his doctors
James A. Garfield was one of the Republican Party's leading lights
in the years following the Civil War. Born in a log cabin, he rose
to become a college president, Union Army general, and
congressman--all by the age of thirty-two. Embodying the
strive-and-succeed spirit that captured the imagination of
Americans in his time, he was elected president in 1880. It is no
surprise that one of his biographers was Horatio Alger.
Garfield's term in office, however, was cut tragically short. Just
four months into his presidency, a would-be assassin approached
Garfield at the Washington, D.C., railroad station and fired a
single shot into his back. Garfield's bad luck was to have his fate
placed in the care of arrogant physicians who did not accept the
new theory of antisepsis. Probing the wound with unwashed and
occasionally manure-laden hands, Garfield's doctors introduced
terrible infections and brought about his death two months later.
Ira Rutkow, a surgeon and historian, offers an insightful portrait
of Garfield and an unsparing narrative of the medical crisis that
defined and destroyed his presidency. For all his youthful
ambition, the only mark Garfield would make on the office would be
one of wasted promise.
Covering both the great military leaders and the critical civilian
leaders, this book provides an overview of their careers and a
professional assessment of their accomplishments. Entries consider
the leaders' character and prewar experiences, their contributions
to the war effort, and the war's impact on the rest of their lives.
The entries then look at how history has assessed these leaders,
thus putting their longtime reputations on the line. The result is
a thorough revision of some leaders' careers, a call for further
study of others, and a reaffirmation of the accomplishments of the
greatest leaders. Analyzing the leaders historiographically, the
work shows how the leaders wanted to be remembered, how postwar
memorists and biographers saw them, the verdict of early
historians, and how the best modern historians have assessed their
contributions. By including a variety of leaders from both civilian
and military roles, the book provides a better understanding of the
total war, and by relating their lives to their times, it provides
a better understanding of historical revisionism and of why history
has been so interested in Civil War lives.
Letting ordinary people speak for themselves, this book uses
primary documents to highlight daily life among Americans-Union and
Confederate, black and white, soldier and civilian-during the Civil
War and Reconstruction. Focusing on routines as basic as going to
school and cooking and cleaning, Voices of Civil War America:
Contemporary Accounts of Daily Life explores the lives of ordinary
Americans during one of the nation's most tumultuous eras. The book
emphasizes the ordinary rather than the momentous to help students
achieve a true understanding of mid-19th-century American culture
and society. Recognizing that there is no better way to learn
history than to allow those who lived it to speak for themselves,
the authors utilize primary documents to depict various aspects of
daily life, including politics, the military, economics, domestic
life, material culture, religion, intellectual life, and leisure.
Each of the documents is augmented by an introduction and
aftermath, as well as lists of topics to consider and questions to
ask. Original materials from a wide range of sources, including
letters, diaries, newspaper editorials, journal articles, and book
chapters Detailed background for each of the 48 featured documents,
placing the experiences and opinions of the authors into historical
context
In the 1840s, engineers blasted through 175 feet of earth and
bedrock at Allatoona Pass, Georgia, to allow passage of the Western
& Atlantic Railroad. Little more than twenty years later, both
the Union and Confederate armies fortified the hills and ridges
surrounding the gorge to deny the other passage during the Civil
War. In October 1864, the two sides met in a fierce struggle to
control the iron lifeline between the North and the recently
captured city of Atlanta. Though small compared to other battles of
the war, this division-sized fight produced casualty rates on par
with or surpassing some of the most famous clashes. Join author
Brad Butkovich as he explores the controversy, innovative weapons
and unwavering bravery that make the Battle of Allatoona Pass one
of the war's most unique and savage battles.
My interest in my grandfather's war history of the Gee-Johnson's
15th AR Infantry Regiment started with a conversation between
myself and Dr. Robert Walz; a History professor at Southern
Arkansas University, who had a friend, Dr. John Ferguson, an AR
State Historian who found an article written by Benjamin F.
Cooling, a park historian at Fort Donelson National Military Park.
The only information I had of my grandfather's service was that he
was in Johnson's AR 15th Company. So this began lots of studying
and research. I have compiled some history for my decendants living
in South Arkansas from 1861-1865, through four years of war and
then the reconstruction the next twelve years. My goal is to leave
my family with history of Colonel's Gee and Johnson and the 15th
AR. This book contains the results of that research.
This appealing narrative history of one of the Civil War's most
pivotal campaigns analyzes how the western Confederate army under
John B. Hood suffered a devastating defeat at the hands of George
H. Thomas's Union forces. Ideal for general readers interested in
military history of the Civil War as well as those concentrating on
the western campaigns, The 1864 Franklin-Nashville Campaign: The
Finishing Stroke examines how the strategic and tactical decisions
by Confederate and Union commanders contributed to the smashing
Northern victories in Tennessee in November-December 1864. The book
also considers the conflict through the lens of New Military
History, including the manner in which the battles both affected
and were affected by civilian individuals, the environment, and
common soldiers such as Confederate veteran Sam Watkins. The result
of author Michael Thomas Smith's extensive research into the Civil
War and his recognition of inadequate coverage of the final western
campaigns in the existing literature, this work serves to rectify
this oversight. The book also questions the concept of the outcome
of the Civil War as being essentially attributable to superior
Northern organization and management-the "organized war to victory"
theory as termed by its proponents. Emphasizes that the Northern
high command suffered from serious dissension and divisions just as
its Southern counterpart did-a historic reality often obscured by
the ultimate Union victory Presents detailed information about the
1864 Franklin-Nashville campaign that suggests that Northern
leadership was remarkably disorganized and often seriously at odds
with one another, even during the war's last major campaign in the
western theater Provides readers with rare insights into the often
chaotic workings of the Civil War high commands, which suffered
from deficiencies stemming from personal rivalries and
honor-related conflicts as well as confused, ineffective
organization and communication
Between 1861 and 1865 seven men commanded the North's Army of
the Potomac. All found themselves, one by one, pitted against a
soldier of consummate ability, Robert E. Lee. How did they react to
this supreme test? What were their patterns of conduct in battle
and at the conference table? This book takes the measure of each
soldier at the crucial moment of his life and the life of the
nation.
As a general, Ulysses S. Grant is routinely described in glowing
terms - the man who turned the tide of the Civil War, who accepted
Lee's surrender at Appomattox, and who had the stomach to see the
war through to final victory. But his presidency is another matter
- the most common word used to characterize it is "scandal." Grant
is routinely portrayed as a man out of his depth, whose trusting
nature and hands-off management style opened the federal coffers to
unprecedented plunder. But that caricature does not do justice to
the realities of Grant's term in office, as Josiah Bunting III
shows in this provocative assessment of our eighteenth president.
Grant came to Washington in 1869 to lead a capital and a country
still bitterly divided by four years of civil war. His predecessor,
Andrew Johnson, had been impeached and nearly driven from office,
and the radical Republicans in Congress were intent on imposing
harsh conditions on the Southern states before allowing them back
into the Union. Grant made it his priority to forge the states into
a single nation, and Bunting shows that despite the troubles that
characterized Grant's terms in office, he was able to accomplish
this most important task-very often through the skillful use of his
own popularity with the American people. Grant was indeed a
military man of the highest order, and he was a better president
than he is often given credit for.
It was 1862, the second year of the Civil War, though Kansans and
Missourians had been fighting over slavery for almost a decade. For
the 250 Union soldiers facing down rebel irregulars on Enoch
Toothman's farm near Butler, Missouri, this was no battle over
abstract principles. These were men of the First Kansas Colored
Infantry, and they were fighting for their own freedom and that of
their families. They belonged to the first black regiment raised in
a northern state, and the first black unit to see combat during the
Civil War. "Soldiers in the Army of Freedom" is the first published
account of this largely forgotten regiment and, in particular, its
contribution to Union victory in the trans-Mississippi theater of
the Civil War. As such, it restores the First Kansas Colored
Infantry to its rightful place in American history.
Composed primarily of former slaves, the First Kansas Colored saw
major combat in Missouri, Indian Territory, and Arkansas. Ian
Michael Spurgeon draws upon a wealth of little-known
sources--including soldiers' pension applications--to chart the
intersection of race and military service, and to reveal the
regiment's role in countering white prejudices by defying
stereotypes. Despite naysayers' bigoted predictions--and a
merciless slaughter at the Battle of Poison Spring--these black
soldiers proved themselves as capable as their white counterparts,
and so helped shape the evolving attitudes of leading politicians,
such as Kansas senator James Henry Lane and President Abraham
Lincoln. A long-overdue reconstruction of the regiment's remarkable
combat record, Spurgeon's book brings to life the men of the First
Kansas Colored Infantry in their doubly desperate battle against
the Confederate forces and skepticism within Union ranks.
Riding into battle with the Union Cavalry
This is a rare, valuable and invaluable book in every way.
Difficult to find on the antiquarian book market, it has been
published by Leonaur to enable today's students and enthusiasts of
the history of the American Civil War to access its text at a
reasonable price. Encapsulated within the pages of this very
substantial volume is the story of the First Ohio Volunteer Cavalry
Regiment. It is, of course, a regimental history, but it is also
much more than that. In common with many regiments of the Civil
War, this regiment had an active 'old comrades' association and it
was this organisation which determined that the history be written
under the guidance of the principal author who was also a serving
officer with the regiment throughout most of the events recounted.
What makes this book particularly special is the inclusion of many
additional, often riveting accounts penned by those who experienced
them in their entirety, covering specific actions or aspects of
life on campaign. Naturally, this book is essential for all those
interested in the American Civil War, the Union Army and its
cavalry arm and those interested in the genealogy of the State of
Ohio since many roles of serving soldiers are also included.
The Civil War acted like a battering ram on human beings,
shattering both flesh and psyche of thousands of soldiers. Despite
popular perception that doctors recklessly erred on the side of
amputation, surgeons laboured mightily to adjust to the medical
quagmire of war. And as Brian Craig Miller shows in Empty Sleeves,
the hospital emerged as the first arena where southerners faced the
stark reality of what amputation would mean for men and women and
their respective positions in southern society after the war. Thus,
southern women, through nursing and benevolent care, prepared men
for the challenges of returning home defeated and disabled. Still,
amputation was a stark fact for many soldiers. On their return,
southern amputees remained dependent on their spouses, peers, and
dilapidated state governments to reconstruct their shattered
manhood and meet the challenges brought on by their newfound
disabilities. It was in this context that Confederate patients
based their medical care decisions on how comrades, families, and
society would view the empty sleeve. In this highly original and
deeply researched work, Miller explores the ramifications of
amputation on the Confederacy both during and after the Civil War
and sheds light on how dependency and disability reshaped southern
society.
|
|