|  | Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Central government > Central government policies 
					
						
						
							
							
								
	
	
	
		
			
				
			
	
 
John Kent has written the first full scholarly study of British and
French policy in their West African colonies during the Second
World War and its aftermath. His detailed analysis shows how the
broader requirements of Anglo-French relations in Europe and the
wider world shaped the formulation and execution of the two
colonial powers' policy in Black Africa. He examines the guiding
principles of the policy-makers in London and Paris and the
problems experienced by the colonial administrators themselves.
This is a genuinely comparative study, thoroughly grounded in both
French and British archives, and it sheds new light on the
development of Anglo-French co-operation in colonial matters in
this period.
			
		 
	
	
	
		
			
				
			
	
 This book examines language education policy in European
migrant-hosting countries. By applying the Multiple Streams
Framework to detailed case studies on Austria and Italy, it sheds
light on the factors and processes that innovate education policy.
The book illustrates an education policy design that values
language diversity and inclusion, and compares underlying
policymaking processes with less innovative experiences. Combining
empirical analysis and qualitative research methods, it assesses
the ways in which language is intrinsically linked to identity and
political power within societies, and how language policy and
migration might become a firmer part of European policy agendas.
Sitting at the intersection between policy studies, language
education studies and integration studies, the book offers
recommendations for how education policy can promote a more
inclusive society. It will appeal to scholars, practitioners and
students who have an interest in policymaking, education policy and
migrant integration.
			
		 
	
	
	
		
			
				
			
	
 Providing context-specific regional and national perspectives, this
novel Handbook sets out to disentangle the considerable
intellectual ambiguities that surround Asian public administration
and Asia's diverse applications of Western administrative models.
Building a holistic understanding of public administration systems
across East, Southeast and South Asia, chapters explore the various
historical formations, contemporary changes, and impacts of local
contexts. It also covers social accountability, performance and
human resource management, and the role of local governments. An
international range of leading scholars track the gradual embrace
of market-driven reforms in Asian public policy and administration,
including privatisation, agencification, outcome-based performance,
and customer choice. With its cross-regional and cross-national
comparisons finding divergences in these reforms, the Handbook's
most significant revelation highlights the impacts of national
political contexts and actors on bureaucracy. Illustrating a clear
overarching picture of the divergences in Asian public
administration, the comparative focus of this Handbook will prove
invaluable to students and scholars of Asian politics, public
policy and administration. It will also be a useful point of
reference to Asian policy makers and bureaucrats dealing with
national administrative reforms who are looking to innovate the
public sector.
			
		 
	
	
	
		
			
				
			
	
 Migration management in Russia is a window into how public policy,
the federal system, and patronage are used to manage conflicting
demands. This multi-level balancing act demonstrates the importance
of high-level politics, institutional interests and constraints,
and the conditions under which government actors at all levels can
pursue their own interests as the state seeks political
equilibrium. Why Control Immigration? argues that a scarcity of
legal labour and the ensuing growth of illegal immigration can act
as a patronage resource for bureaucratic and regional elites.
Assessing the legal and political context of migration, Caress
Schenk blends a political science approach with insights from the
comparative immigration literature. Using this framework, she also
engages with attitudes on populism and anti-immigration,
particularly in terms of how political leaders utilize and employ
public opinion in Russia.
			
		 |   |